Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


NEVADA LEGISLATURE: Democrats tout agenda

Leaders plan hearings to assess budget needs




The Democrats who control the state Legislature, under pressure to come up with alternatives to the governor's unpopular budget proposals, presented an agenda Thursday for the legislative session, which starts next week.

Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley and Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford put forward plans to prevent home foreclosures, create "green" jobs and embark on an intensive budget-building process that includes long-term fiscal planning.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • The plans do not spell out how much money Buckley and Horsford, both D-Las Vegas, think should be in the next state budget or where they think it should come from. Rather, they proposed a schedule of hearings over the next two months in which legislative committees would review the major areas of the budget and set targets for funding.

    "We are in the worst financial situation we have been in in our state's history," Horsford said at a news conference with Buckley. "We will not follow the governor's lead and slash budgets without consulting Nevadans."

    Republican Gov. Jim Gibbons has challenged the Democrats, who hold the majority in both legislative houses, to come up with better ideas if they do not like Gibbons' proposed cuts to teacher salaries and higher education.

    But Horsford said legislators want to make budget determinations through a transparent, deliberative process in which the public, the business community and other interests all can have a say.

    "We will not make these decisions in a vacuum," Horsford said.

    Gibbons called the idea that he had concocted his budget in a backroom "misleading."

    "Every state entity met with our Budget Office before and during the time my proposed budget was put together," the governor said in a statement. "Legislative staff were invited to and attended every meeting with agency personnel." Only the higher education system declined to fully participate, he said.

    Gibbons said he was pleased to see Democrats share his concern for renewable energy and long-term budgeting. But when it comes to this year's budget, he said, Democratic leaders have had months to consider the budget crisis but still have no specifics to offer.

    "Our citizens expect us to find solutions to the economic crisis instead of making excuses as to why we have not found those solutions," Gibbons said. He termed the Democrats' budget process nothing more than a "plan to have a plan."

    Buckley said the budget review will assess "what we can cut, what we can reform and what we must preserve" and will last from Feb. 6 to March 30.

    Legislators then will vote on the spending targets for "what the state needs to finance if we are to maintain our priorities," Buckley said. Little doubt exists that spending will need to be cut, she said, but Gibbons' proposed cuts go too far.

    "I am predicting that there will be bipartisan agreement that the level of these cuts cannot be as severe as that proposed by the governor," Buckley said.

    Gibbons' proposed $6.2 billion budget would see the state spend more than $600 million less than the amount legislators approved in 2007. Gibbons' proposal includes a 6 percent cut in state worker salaries and a 36 percent cut to higher education funding.

    It appears likely that the federal economic stimulus bill making its way through Congress will help Nevada close its budget gap. In the version that passed the House of Representatives this week, the state would get about $1.3 billion for generic budget relief, education funding, Medicaid and other purposes. The legislation that is being considered by the Senate might be still more generous.

    Buckley and Horsford said once votes are taken on essential spending levels, legislators then would examine the revenues needed to reach them. The committees will study existing tax exemptions and abatements to see whether they ought to remain in place and look at ways to crack down on uncollected taxes before taking up the question of whether new revenue sources -- that is, increased taxes -- are needed.

    The Democrats have set an April 17 deadline for drafting a revenue plan. They said they hope to have a budget put together not long after the state Economic Forum on May 1 delivers the final projections that dictate available revenue.

    "Our hope is that the budget plan will be ready earlier than ever before," Buckley said.

    There is no question that the budget crisis will be at the center of this legislative session. But the Democrats also are proposing policy measures that they said will help ease Nevadans' economic pain.

    The foreclosure plan would force lenders to go through mediation with homeowners before foreclosing, a measure the Democrats said would lead to loan modification plans allowing people to stay in their homes, potentially preventing almost 13,000 foreclosures.

    More than 51,000 Nevada homeowners are losing their homes to foreclosure, Horsford said, while 48 percent are "upside down" on their houses. The housing market crash has decimated the construction and related industries and contributes to rising crime rates, Horsford said.

    Other proposals would protect renters from being evicted without notice by banks foreclosing on their landlords; require banks to keep up foreclosed properties so neighborhoods do not become blighted; and curb predatory mortgage lending practices.

    The green jobs plan would set up training centers for new jobs improving energy efficiency in buildings, for which money is being set aside in the federal stimulus plan.

    "We will be able to make renewable energy a priority that it has not been in the past," Horsford said. Nevada, he said, could create 15,000 "green-collar jobs" weatherizing homes and making buildings more efficient.

    The Nevada Conservation League on Thursday endorsed the plan and said it would put Nevadans to work while at the same time allowing consumers to save on energy costs.

    In addition to the short-term patching of the budget gap, the Democrats hope to enact measures that would ease the effect of future economic downturns by putting 1.5 percent of all revenue collected in a "budget stabilization fund" that could be drawn upon under bad conditions.

    Buckley said that the state would not start depositing into such an account until the current recession eases but that now is the time to put it in place while the effects of today's downturn are vivid in people's minds.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 48 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    save 15% right off the top wrote on January 30, 2009 08:02 PM: stop paying county paramedics for work they are not doing.

    http://www.lvrj.com/news/10228251.html


    psssst Annie wrote on January 30, 2009 05:17 PM: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs&eurl=http://sweetness-light.com/archive/watch-dems-defend-the-fanniefreddie-scam


    Dee Dee wrote on January 30, 2009 04:19 PM: Stay away Jim Rogers! Understand? You single handedly destroyed the higher education system by your childish rants and cry baby behavior. We don't like you, we don't want you. Do not go to Carson City. Instead there's a place down under where you can join this skinny man who is all red and carries a pitch fork.


    milfy2001 wrote on January 30, 2009 04:02 PM: jill,
    you are forgetting the most important difference between a private sector job and a public sector job.
    i VOLUNTARILY decide who gets my dollars when i buy goods and services in the private sector. I am FORCED to pay your salary through taxes even if i do not use that government service or think it can be done better by private enterprise (education being the prime example here). you only PAY my salary if you do business with my employer. you can go somewhere else if you don't like it. i have no choice and have to deal with you.


    Johnathan L. Abbinett wrote on January 30, 2009 03:23 PM: O.K. "Rasputin" since it's a Super Bowl Weekend, let me put it this way - Independents don't get to affect who gets through the playoffs! But, they can have an effect on who wins in the General Election!

    Otherwise, please accept my heart-felt apologies if I hurt your teeny, weeny feelings for criticizing you for spreading "erroneous" er, "stuff" - GEEEESHE!

    "Annie" THANK YOU for reaffirming my original point about FACTS!


    honesty wrote on January 30, 2009 01:20 PM: rasputin, i'm sorry, but believing the garbage you spread here is a sign that you are not thinking, so please don't claim to be ...


    Annie wrote on January 30, 2009 12:41 PM: rasputin;

    The deregulation of the financial industry was done by Republican controlled Congress (ss Gramm legislation 2000 and 1999); Clinton signed the d&*n things. Too, the SEC and Thrift agencies did not regulate in the 21st century and in fact did the opposite;

    freddie and fannie?! Come one, this has been well debunked. The reregulation of these two agencies was stopped in the Republican controlled congress. Frist (R) wouldn't lets S.B 5 come to the floor for a vote. Why? Newt Gingrich was on freddie payroll as was McCain chief campaign manager...they worked to kill any additional law changes. A true fact is that Bush, by executive order, could have changed many of the issues with fannie/freddie but he didn't.

    Bush in 2002 made it a goal for 5m new low income homeoners to get their own houses.....but bad lenders with bad practices.....

    I note a lot of foreclosures in the most affluent areas all around the Valley, poor people weren't the one behind those mult-imillion dollar homes going belly up were they?


    Jill wrote on January 30, 2009 12:33 PM: miraje,

    Everybody pays everbody's salary. That is they way an economy works. State workers get paid from taxes that are set aside for certain services. Private industry workers are paid by people buying things or paying for services. I don't know what your occupation is, but your salary is paid by people in your community, just like mine. I haven't seen any difference in complaints between government workers and private industry. We all need our jobs. I face reality everyday. That reality is that I might not have a job tomorrow, even if we weren't in recession. That is the same reality you have. We all need to make decisions based on what is best for us. You spouting on about how you pay for my salary is just whining. I'm not asking you to pay more taxes so I will get a raise. All I expect is a little common courtesy and common sense.


    Rasputin wrote on January 30, 2009 12:26 PM: Mr. Abbinett:

    As enjoyable as it is to have a RESPECTFUL and informed conversation, my parting thoughts are these:

    I *have* ample 'cahones' (sic) (that's 'cajones', by the way), thanks.

    I do not need remedial, anvanced or expert level civics, thanks again. The reason I am an Independent is the utter corruption that's part of both of the major political parties in the US.

    As for the primaries, I use my vote as my most potent weapon. And, when I find a worthwhile candidate, I *do* help them, both financially and with my volunteered time and efforts.

    Perhaps, in the future, you'd do well to remember that name calling and snide platitudes are not conducive to an intelligent, reasonable conversation.


    No_more_mooching wrote on January 30, 2009 12:19 PM: GOP & DEM are both BIG government parties. They have no real substantive differences. They both vote for gov-based solutions. One party tries to give taxpayer money to union members and ambulence chasers, and the other one likes to give it to government contractors. I prefer that the gov just flush the money down the toilet.

    Please stop criticizing the NV GOP for their proposed budget cuts. Total NV gov spending (general fund + federal money) will still be pretty close to record levels. The spending figures rise whether we elect Bob Miller (D), Kenny Guinn (R), or Jim Fibbons (R).

    GOP spending priorities might be a little different than the NEA-dominated DEMs, but they still want to spend as much money as current revenues permit. OK, so they want to spend a little less than the DEMs. The problem is not the tens of millions more that the DEMs want to spend, it's the BILLIONS that BOTH parties support.

    A pox on both their houses.


    Read All Comments