Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


VICE ENFORCEMENT'S TOP OFFENDERS: Police are taking unprecedented steps to keep prostitution offenders off the Strip

WORKING GIRLS: Las Vegas' 50 most prolific prostitutes

RELATED STORY

















































































Call it a unique kind of most wanted list or simply an attempt to clamp down on the area's worst-kept secret.

Working off a roster of the reputed 50 "most prolific prostitutes" in Clark County, Las Vegas police and prosecutors are taking unprecedented steps to keep repeat prostitution offenders off the Strip.


Most Popular Stories
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • Some are criticizing the law enforcement crackdown as overly aggressive. And it comes at a time when some policymakers are talking about eventually legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution in the Las Vegas Valley.

    The Vice Enforcement Top Offenders (VETO) list, which took the vice unit two years to compile, has the names of women with the longest prostitution-related criminal records in Clark County, said Lt. Karen Hughes.

    Most of the women on the list have been convicted of exchanging sex for money or of prostitution-related theft charges inside several Strip hotels, not for street prostitution.

    Within days of launching the crackdown, police over Super Bowl weekend arrested 13 of the women on charges of soliciting prostitution, loitering for the purposes of prostitution, or trespassing, police records show.

    In all, 24 of the 50 women on the list were arrested between Jan. 28 and Feb. 13, all on misdemeanor charges.

    Six on the list were arrested twice during that period.

    Those arrested range in age from 20 to 41.

    Police declined a request by the Review-Journal for the entire VETO list.

    Hughes said it is time to stop the revolving door of prostitution-related arrests, especially when those arrests involve "trick rolls," in which prostitutes steal from men.

    "We're talking about girls who have been arrested repeatedly over the years, ones that we all know by face and by name," said Hughes, citing one woman who was arrested 18 times in a single year.

    "If they get the message that Las Vegas is not going to ignore their subsequent arrests, then maybe they'll take their lifestyle to a different city," she said.

    Or at least to a different part of Clark County.

    In a memo to prosecutors about VETO cases, Assistant District Attorney Christopher Lalli last month told his staff to offer plea agreements that would include possible jail time and an order that defendants "refrain from entering the resort corridor" for a period of six or 12 months.

    The guilty plea offer also will include 100 hours of community service and mandatory attendance of an AIDS awareness class.

    If caught back in the resort corridor for any reason other than lawful employment or residency, the subject will be rearrested and given jail time, Lalli's memo said.

    City and county ordinances have allowed for so-called "order-out zones" in downtown Las Vegas and the Strip since the late 1990s.

    In the past, order-outs usually were agreed to by defendants in exchange for probation.

    Hughes spoke about the VETO program and the general problem of prostitution at a meeting of Justice Court judges last month.

    The judges were briefed on the initiative even before the sheriff was.

    Her appearance before the justices of the peace is problematic, said Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. "It's a cause for real concern when police are going to judges and promoting their policy for cleaning up the Strip."

    Peck also wondered whether police are relying so heavily on a Top 50 list that it will lead to prostitution arrests without probable cause. Such arrests would pave the way for the issuance of order-outs.

    "It would be troubling if this list is being used as a substitute for sound police judgment," he said.

    Hughes said police won't make initial prostitution-related arrests without proof that a new crime has been committed.

    "Just because they're on the list doesn't mean they're going to jail," she said.

    Lalli said he hopes the VETO effort will put a dent in prostitution. He cited special prosecution guidelines on other crimes such as car theft, which has been dwindling recently, as evidence that crackdowns work.

    "Prostitution is one of those areas that brings with it a whole host of undesirable things," Lalli said. "If you're a prostitute out there, the message is, 'Don't commit your act of prostitution around here.' "

    Hughes said new names probably would be added to the VETO list once the first set of cases goes through the court system.

    She said law enforcement's tough approach to the problem could give way to a push for other alternative sentences for prostitutes and even a court that hears only prostitution cases.

    Mayor Oscar Goodman, whose jurisdiction doesn't include the Strip, questioned whether a crackdown on prostitutes is the best public policy. He said pimps should be the main targets of law enforcement.

    "It's the exploiters of these women who are the real villains here," Goodman said. "I have a deep and abiding conviction that they are the primary offenders."

    Just because police don't have a list of the most prolific pimps doesn't mean the vice unit is ignoring that part of the problem in its undercover operations, Hughes said.

    "We've got two investigative teams that deal with nothing but pimps," she said. "But we also want to minimize opportunities for prostitutes to be aggressive with the tourists and with men who aren't interested in that."

    Citing more than 5,000 prostitution arrests last year by the vice unit along the Strip, a 46 percent increase from the number two years ago, Hughes said she is concerned that prostitution hurts tourism and creates a bad image for Las Vegas.

    "Vice has always had a zero tolerance on prostitution," Hughes said. "There's more work out there than we can wrap our arms around. Our hope is that we convey to prostitutes and pimps who operate here that this is not an easy city to make money."

    She rallied support for the VETO effort at a meeting of hotel security chiefs earlier this month.

    Several hotel officials contacted by the Review-Journal didn't return phone calls.

    Hotels are just one place police are looking for prostitutes, Hughes said. Their attention is also directed on the street and at "erotic services" advertised in print and online publications.

    In a related effort, undercover female officers make arrests of men who try to hire prostitutes. This group tends to be less apt to reoffend, according to Hughes.

    As police ratchet up efforts to reduce prostitution, Goodman renewed his call for a discussion about options for legalizing or decriminalizing prostitution.

    "If I were to engage in discussion, I'd be thinking in terms of a Little Amsterdam," a red-light district with legalized brothels, he said. "But I'm not advocating it."

    Prostitution is legal in 10 rural Nevada counties, but not in Clark or Washoe counties.

    Goodman said legalized and regulated brothels over time could generate hundreds of millions of dollars for this area.

    State Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, chairman of the Senate Taxation Committee, said last month he was open to the idea of holding a legislative hearing to discuss legalizing and taxing prostitution in the state's urban counties.

    It appears, however, that the Legislature will not act on that idea this session.

    At a recent meeting of the Review-Journal editorial board, Sheriff Doug Gillespie spoke out strongly against such proposals.

    For now, Goodman said, Las Vegas police should enforce the laws on the book.

    Barbara Brents, a sociology professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, said she is surprised that law enforcement would focus so heavily on cracking down on prostitution.

    "It seems pretty hypocritical to me to have an economy based on sexualizing women and then to come down on the women when police want to make it seem like they're enforcing the law," she said. "It's coming down on women who are least able to fight back."

    Defense attorney James "Bucky" Buchanan, who has defended many clients accused of prostitution, sees practical problems with the effort.

    "As much as Metro wants to do this, it's just going to clog the courts," he said. "I don't think Metro has thought out the consequences and financial impact of this."

    On the bright side, Buchanan said, the crop of VETO arrests will make a lot of money for attorneys like him.

    Contact reporter Alan Maimon at amaimon @reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0404.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 642 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    olivia wrote on September 19, 2009 07:26 PM: Seriously! Placing pics of these ladies, do u really think its going to make them get out of this line of work.Its the oldest & BEST profession for some, not all woman can master it but TO EA. IS HIS OWN, RIGHT!

    metro needs to stop asking for id's and maybe ask why dead beat dads are not paying child support and getting away with it, or why REAL CRIMINCALS are still committing crimes.

    GET A REAL TOPIC AND DARE TO THINK FOR YOURSELF.


    Report abuse

    Erica wrote on August 24, 2009 11:34 AM: OMG! I know one of those girls!


    Report abuse

    mike wrote on August 08, 2009 12:09 AM: Stop wasting tax payers money. Especially in this slow economy that we are all facing. Either, pump our tax money back into the economy or go after real criminals.
    Shame on RJ for putting these ladies photos in the paper and violating their privacy...


    Report abuse

    Jackie wrote on July 30, 2009 11:29 PM: Las Vegas loves T and A but HATES WOMEN! Plain and simple. QUIT outing people RJ and start helping women make better choices, ok?!


    Report abuse

    Thomas wrote on July 11, 2009 12:20 PM: I don't see what the big deal is. Prostitution should be legalized in the Vegas Valley. Kept in it's own area and regulated, oprostitution can really help the local economy, especially in our current state of economic recess.


    Report abuse

    Justin wrote on July 03, 2009 07:56 AM: What a sick topic for the Journal to report on. I can't believe people read this garbage, and waste of our trust in the media. This is why nobody in America can stand our media I guess. I in no way support prostitution, but why such a big deal like this? Why not the 50 most prolific people who cheat on there taxes...or people who dont treat their wives right...or how about 50 people who lie...we all commit crimes...we all do wrong. I dont care how good of a person you say you are...everyone is wrong. Why plaster there faces in the paper and waste good news space for REAL story's. This is the kind of junk wasted tax money on a petty crime, and even more wasted money spent on a garbage newspaper. Subscription canceled.


    Report abuse

    rmhopper3 wrote on July 02, 2009 09:33 AM: I guessing because its against the law and ...lets see trick rolls....pick pocketing....out right theft, public hygene, drug abuse....
    If you want to practice a trade try automechanics or work on getting the law changed ...so it will be a legal occupation with rules and licenses


    Report abuse

    I always loved Nevada! wrote on July 01, 2009 01:26 PM: It is more than reprehensible, that R/J
    published these photos. And I agree with "Nevadan" - smile girls smile!
    It's a great laughing matter, when you
    can drive to Pahrump and get anything
    you want. What a double standard!

    And our beloved mayor, The Honorable
    Oscar Goodman has a right idea, but when you get politicians involved - look at the straying senators, congressmen - crying on TV, asking for
    forgivness.
    It has been around, it is around and it will be around, no matter how much of
    our hard earned monies will be spent.
    Did not we just raised sales tax?

    Control, medical supervision (just like in Pahrump), clean healthy girls and
    end of the problem. (Plus revenues!)
    Interestingly: most of the girls on the
    photos were arrested for trespassing.
    Just counted only 2 for soliciting.....
    Can someone explain the difference?
    I always thought that trespassing is
    when you step on your neighbour's grass!

    And I am looking for yellow background
    with comments from reporters and editors. Since I do not see a single
    one, where are they? Are the reporters
    yellow?


    Report abuse

    NoNo wrote on July 01, 2009 04:21 AM: Come on boys did you really have to do this.


    Report abuse

    Nevadan At Heart wrote on June 30, 2009 02:57 AM: Back in March, someone wrote:
    It is reprehensible that the Review Journal chose to publish these ladies' photos. I commend those who chose to smile! You look great!

    If you were one of those pictured here, please contact the ACLU- they are expecting your call and want to help you:
    ACLU of Nevada, Las Vegas Office
    732 South Sixth Street, Suite 200A

    Did anything ever come of this?


    Read All Comments