Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
News


Supreme Court suspends attorney

Longtime LV lawyer Douglas Crawford avoids disbarment

The Nevada Supreme Court has suspended Douglas Crawford for five years, rejecting a recommendation to disbar the longtime Las Vegas attorney who stole nearly $400,000 from clients to support his gambling and drug addictions.

Crawford, 53, was temporarily suspended in May 2007 and later admitted to 65 violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, primarily involving the misappropriation of client funds.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • In April, a State Bar of Nevada disciplinary panel unanimously recommended disbarment for Crawford, who obtained his law license in 1985.

    "If this were to happen even one more time to an innocent client whose life savings were lost due to an act of Mr. Crawford, it would be a black stain upon the State Bar and the attorneys who abide, on a daily basis, to the professional ethics of that organization which could never be erased," according to the panel's order in April. "The risk is too great and, therefore, after much soul searching and discussion, it is the final decision of this panel that Mr. Crawford be disbarred as an attorney and refused the opportunity to ever practice law in this jurisdiction again."

    An attempt to reach Crawford on Thursday through his attorney, Michael Warhola, was unsuccessful.

    The Supreme Court reviewed the disciplinary panel's recommendation and issued its suspension order Wednesday, the day the suspension took effect.

    "We conclude that the mitigating circumstances outweigh the aggravating circumstances, and as a result, a five-year suspension is the appropriate discipline," the court ruled.

    Mitigating factors included Crawford's good character and reputation, remorse, and "mental disabilities of depression and gambling addiction."

    According to the order, Crawford must pass the bar exam again before applying for reinstatement. He also must "maintain his gambling recovery efforts" and pay restitution for the funds he misappropriated.

    The disciplinary panel, in its prior order, noted that "there were a number of character witnesses who attested to the level of professionalism and integrity under which Mr. Crawford had practiced for the majority of his career."

    "However, on repeated occasions Mr. Crawford -- over the last several years -- has stolen money from his clients' trust accounts," the panel wrote. "He has taken money from them for legal services which were never performed. He has acted in derogation of court orders to invade his trust account and take monies to which he was not even arguably entitled. He has asserted he did these actions pursuant to a character weakness involving an addiction to gambling, drugs, and alcohol."

    Prior to his suspension, Crawford made regular appearances on KVBC-TV, Channel 3.

    Members of the State Bar's disciplinary panel "do not condemn Mr. Crawford," according to its order.

    "He has testified he is a changed man and the Panel certainly hopes he is. However, his direct testimony was that it was the pressures of the practice of law which caused him to succumb, the first time, into these terrible and despicable depths. The Panel finds nothing upon which they can rest a guarantee that if Mr. Crawford were allowed to practice law again the same practice would not cause him to suffer the same degree of stress and react in the same manner to that stress."

    Contact reporter Carri Geer Thevenot at cgeer@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-8135.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Gary Taylor wrote on February 27, 2009 10:48 AM: After seeing this article on attorney Douglas Crawford,I am amazed,but not surprized at the almost predictible position the Nevada State Bar takes with a poor example of an attorney,such as Crawford.I had personal experience dealing with this individual,as he represented my ex-wife in an ongoing custodial dispute.He conducted himself in an unproffesional manner,both inside and outside the courtroom.Ironically,several years later,I was having breakfast at the Omlette House restaurant on West Charleston,when I overheard a very lous ,obnoxious,individual talking on his cellphone.He was in the company of a young woman,and apparently was talking to that young womans mother,and loudly proclaimed that the two of them were about to leave and go to this individuals home to (sic)" Get naked and go into the hot tub"!He then asked the individual on the phone,if she cared to join them. He also was overheard discussing details about clients cases,and it was at this time that I assumed he was some sort of an attorney.Mind you,my back was to this particular individual,the whole time I was hearing this exchange.Upon preparing to leave,I stood up and turned to leave,imagine my surprize to see my old obsreperous buddy Douglas Crawford.Sure enough ,upon exiting the Omlette House parking lot,I see his Jaguar with his personal licence plates "Litigator"This individual should be an affront to anyone in the legal proffesion,but as has been my personal experience with the State Bar of Nevada,when expecting some kind of redress with respect to unethical,unproffessional attorneys,nothing ,sadly,is ever issued in an adjuatory manner.My mother is always fond of saying,"What goes around,comes around"!In this particular example of another attorney committing what can only be criminal acts,again justice is blind!


    Unfair wrote on February 23, 2009 10:08 PM: NHP Trooper is fired after making a sexual advance one time at a Christmas party. This guy gets a slap after confessions of multiple violations? Many statements about him being sex crazed, alcohol, drugs, gambling etc...and he testifies he is a changed man? Hey Trooper, maybe you should consider becoming an attorney. Shame on Nevada for not disbarring this guy and making him serve time in jail!


    p wrote on February 23, 2009 06:14 AM: Post made by Glenn is incorrect. Mr. Crawford stole $82,000 from me (a single mother in a bitter divorce). There is a judgement against him (Amount quoted by Glenn is incorrect). I have had a collection agency after him for over a year and have not seen a penny. He currently works as a paralegal for Lucien Crave. Nevada's laws and favoritism make me sick!! Mr. Crawford, I offer you my thanks for the harm you caused myself and my child. Thank you Nevada legal system for all that you have done to me and my child.


    Glenn wrote on February 21, 2009 04:42 PM: This SOB stole $61,000.00 from my X and myself. I hope he does get back onto his feet because we have a $157,000.00 judgement against him. The only way I am going to get my money is if this jerk is working.


    dosboot wrote on February 20, 2009 09:03 PM: Don't pay back the casino on a hundred dollar marker = crime

    Steal a pack of cigarettes from a convenience store = crime

    An attorney steals over $400,000.00 from his clients = no crime

    The District Attorney has spoken

    There are two sets of laws in Nevada one for the rich and connected and the other for the rest of us...


    Gary G.g wrote on February 20, 2009 06:02 PM: IT COULD HAVE BEEN WORSE...HE COULD HAVE BECOME A C.P.A.


    Bart wrote on February 20, 2009 10:04 AM: Doug is a nice guy. A little too SEX crazied. Amazing how many lives he touched. A few of his former employee's had very similar problems.
    They must have been going to the same source. Ironically, at one time or another they too were suspended.
    Doug did put on the Black Robe on a few occassions as a pro tem Judge.

    In the legal community the cup is over flowing with very similar conduct. The actions of the Supreme Court are typical in protecting their own.

    I wonder how many Judges spoke up for Doug? It is a big, big circle of friends.

    Doug, nice guy, but no pass. I bet he is probably working for some Attorney's office as a paralegal as we speak. (maybe the DA)

    Is this a thumbs up or down for the Supreme Court's decision?


    Soo SAd wrote on February 20, 2009 09:10 AM: The Nevada Supreme Court has suspended Douglas Crawford for five years, rejecting a recommendation to disbar the longtime Las Vegas attorney who stole nearly $400,000 from clients to support his gambling and drug addictions.
    Any N.S.C.Judge that can read this line and not see this is a miscarriage of justice does not deserve their post.
    Disbarr this man and all the other lawyers that are stealing from their clients and making inside deals with the DA's i can name you a couple if you have trouble finding them.


    Huh? wrote on February 20, 2009 08:51 AM: Where did it say anything about him being a judge? Did you even read the article?


    Who is Judging the Judge wrote on February 20, 2009 07:38 AM: Are you kidding me? "a five-year suspension is the appropriate discipline". He STOLE almost a half million dollars? How many people has he supported sending to prison for stealing small fractions of that? Why isn't this guy charged for committing a crime? How many people did he 'represent' while 'impaired by drugs'? If I were in the slammer sucking $20k/year from taxpayers because of him 'judging' me, I would be OUTRAGED. Oh, wait... I AM a taxpayer, who pays his salary.. and he gets a 'slap on the wrist' for STEALING $400,000 from innocent people - I am beyond outraged! Does he get probation? Community service? ANY PUNISHMENT FOR HIS CRIME?


    Read All Comments