Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


$950 MILLION: Boyd makes Station an offer

Deal would give Boyd bulk of rival's properties




Boyd Gaming Corp. has made a $950 million offer to acquire a significant portion of locals gaming rival Station Casinos, the company announced Monday in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Boyd Gaming currently operates nine casinos in Las Vegas and Henderson. Under the proposed deal, Boyd Gaming would acquire the bulk of Station Casinos' 18 Southern Nevada properties, including Green Valley Ranch Resort, the recently opened Aliante Station, Santa Fe Station, Texas Station, Wild Wild West, the two Fiesta properties in Henderson and North Las Vegas, and several smaller nonhotel gaming businesses, such as the Wildfire.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • Station Casinos would retain ownership of the Red Rock Resort, Palace Station, Boulder Station, Sunset Station and 356 acres of undeveloped land the company controls in the Las Vegas Valley. Those four casinos have almost $2.5 billion in debt tied to them, according to a Station Casinos' filing with the SEC last August.

    Privately held Station Casinos has been in financial trouble for much of the past 12 months and is on the brink of filing for bankruptcy. The company missed a $14.6 million bond payment on Feb. 2 and a $15.5 million bond payment last week. On Feb. 3, Station Casinos asked its bondholders to approve a restructuring plan that could allow the company to emerge from a Chapter 11 filing by this summer. Bondholders have until March 2 to vote on the restructuring plan.

    The company's prepackaged bankruptcy proposal included a debt exchange offer that would give bondholders between 10 cents and 50 cents on the dollar in new notes and cash.

    "I think Boyd is trying to take advantage of a potential opportunity and capitalize on the bankruptcy proposal," Deutsche Bank gaming analyst Bill Lerner said after news of the offer surfaced. "Boyd is seemingly offering the subordinated unsecured lenders a better deal than they would get out of the company's proposal."

    Wachovia gaming analyst Dennis Farrell Jr., also thought Station Casinos bondholders would see more value under Boyd Gaming's proposal. He said the offer allows Boyd Gaming to become a "stalking horse bidder" in bankruptcy court, meaning the company could try and acquire some of the assets through a restructuring.

    "This is a strong statement by Boyd Gaming to double down on the locals market," Farrell said. "There is still a lot to be determined."

    Macquarie Securities gaming analyst Joel Simkins told investors the transaction would give Boyd Gaming control of more than one-third of the overall Las Vegas locals gaming market, which has suffered tremendously during the current economic downturn. Casinos in North Las Vegas saw a 6.7 percent decline in gaming revenues in 2008, the Boulder Strip saw a 10.5 percent decline while the balance of Clark County, which contains much of the locals market, fell 7.2 percent.

    "Boyd and Station have fought tooth and nail over an extremely similar database with extremely attractive promotions," Simkins wrote in a note to investors. "That said, we believe these marketing redundancies may be the biggest cost savings within a possible acquisition."

    In an "indication of intent" letter to Station Casinos Chief Executive Officer Frank Fertitta III, Boyd Gaming Executive Chairman Bill Boyd and CEO Keith Smith said they would be willing to discuss acquiring other portions of the company as well.

    "Based on available public information, we estimate that the enterprise value of the ... assets is approximately $950 million," according to the letter that was filed with the SEC after the close of trading on the stock market Monday.

    "Boyd would be prepared to offer this amount in cash to existing stakeholders to acquire the ... assets following, or as part of, the reorganization of Station. We believe this value would present a superior recovery to the unsecured creditors of Station versus the current exchange offer. We believe that Boyd is uniquely qualified to operate the assets of Station."

    Boyd Gaming spokesman Rob Stillwell said the company would not comment on the filing beyond the letter.

    Late Monday, Station Casinos issued a brief statement, saying the company will evaluate Boyd Gaming's offer.

    "We received an unsolicited, non-binding, preliminary indication of interest from Boyd Gaming Corp. to buy some of our company's assets," according to the statement e-mailed by company spokeswoman Lori Nelson. "We intend to continue to work with our lenders and bondholders to pursue our previously proposed plan of reorganization."

    Station Casinos, which was founded by the Fertitta family, went private in November 2007 in a $5.4 billion private equity-financed deal. The Fertitta family members own 25 percent of Station Casinos while Los Angeles-based real estate firm Colony Capital owns 75 percent of the company. However, the Fertittas have control of the board.

    Also, Station Casinos operates the Green Valley Ranch Resort, Aliante Station and several smaller properties in joint venture partnerships with the Greenspun Corp.

    The company also manages an American Indian casino near Sacramento, Calif., and has agreements in place to manage proposed Indian casinos in California and Michigan. The company also owns 204 acres in Reno for potential casino development.

    In its letter, Boyd Gaming said it has $2 billion available under its revolving line of credit to finance the transaction.

    "Boyd envisions that any binding offer would be subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary conditions," the letter stated. "In order to be in a position to deliver a binding offer, we will need to meet with Station's key managers and visit Station's casino properties."

    The company has also had its own financial issues. On Aug. 1, Boyd Gaming halted construction of the $4.8 billion Echelon development on the Strip because of the diminishing credit markets. The company said it won't restart construction on Echelon this year and is considering scope changes in the project that covers 87 Strip acres, including the site of former Stardust resort.

    Boyd Gaming has acquired a rival in the past. In July 2004, Boyd bought Coast Casinos for $1.3 billion from Michael Gaughan, which added the Barbary Coast, Gold Coast, Orleans, Suncoast and the under-construction South Coast to the company.

    Two year later, Gaughan resigned from Boyd's board of directors, traded his stock in the company for the South Coast and renamed his privately held casino South Point. Boyd traded the Barbary Coast in 2007 for additional land adjacent to the Echelon site.

    Boyd Gaming has since solidified its Coast Casinos subsidiary, adding its Sam's Town Casino on the Boulder Highway into the operating group. The company runs three casinos downtown and two small casino-only properties in Henderson.

    Boyd shares, which have lost more than 85 percent of their value in the last 12 months, closed at $3.40 on the New York Stock Exchange, down 12 cents or 3.41 percent.

    Contact reporter Howard Stutz at hstutz@reviewjournal.com or 702-477-3871.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 48 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    David wrote on March 02, 2009 04:19 AM: I cannot imagine the Fertittas going for this deal at $950 million.

    I can't imagine bondholders accepting the insulting offer made by Stations. At least Boyd upped the ante, for which Stations will either have to cough up more or be forced into accepting Boyds offer, regardless of what it is.


    gigi wrote on February 28, 2009 12:54 PM: I am not a local or tourist-just visit svereal times a year from Ca---buti do not play at a casino no matter what--if the slots are "tight" i stay out an go elsewhere and plenty of places are tight--las vegas in general is not what it used to be years ago and never will be better then that time no matter how many resort type( over priced but beautiful )casinoS they build-i rATHER sTAy downtown or sTate line and use my money on other things besides room rates!


    Eric wrote on February 28, 2009 11:01 AM: One of the best locals casinos around was the Santa Fe...until Stations took it over and turned it into another slots warehouse and low-end food factory. Congrats, Fertitta!


    Dark Gable wrote on February 28, 2009 12:57 AM: I cannot imagine the Fertittas going for this deal at $950 million. They may as well plow through with bankruptcy than practically give away all those properties to the Boyd family. By the way, the Boyds are penny-pinchers too. Do not let the "squeaky clean" image of the Boyds fool you.


    union valley wrote on February 25, 2009 10:29 AM: [img]http://www.unionparkvegas.com/images/parcel-img.jpg[/img]


    whinny teachers wrote on February 25, 2009 08:23 AM: I am tired of teachers saying they dont make any money...Calculate your hourly rate!!! most professionals work well over the 2080 hours a year deemed full-time! i personally am required to work 3120 hours for my very nice SALARY (hint no overtime being paid here!) how many do teachers work??? they get 2.5 months off in the summer...four weeks vacation...2 weeks of sick time...ALL national holidays off..quite whinning!!!


    Free Nevada Meat Tokens wrote on February 24, 2009 10:57 PM: jcm, wow...that's a cool and loaded question...and I suspect the answer changed from the good 'ole days (30s-80s) to now (90s-00s). Tell me if I get it right:

    a) 'Decent Locals' view casinos elastically, meaning, if the casinos are too 'tight', the Locals won't play as much;

    b) 'Tourists and Locals-with-Issues' view casinos inelastically; meaning, they are coming no matter what;

    Your question of whether the tax on casino revenue is elastic or inelastic is the question of whether 'raising or lowering taxes' on casinos will 'increase or reduce' casino patronage.

    c) Therefore, the answer can be determined by looking at whether MOST casino revenue comes from 'Decent Locals' (a) or whether it comes more from 'Tourists and Locals-with-Issues' (b).

    To answer that question, think back to the Go-Go days (2004), when Stations was the most profitable gaming company. Since Stations caters to Locals, we could just look to their records from 2004 to determine what portion of their revenue came from 'Decent Locals' (a) and what portion came from 'Tourism and Locals-with-Issues' (b).

    My gut tells me MOST came from (b), which means tax on casino revenue is inelastic in Nevada...(so you can raise or lower the tax without impacting casino patronage) --but who cares about my gut...there is no way to know unless your last name is Fertita.

    (--but it might be tempting to look at the testimonials of Stations "tightening up" and conclude that price-hike caused their patronage to go down, which would mean that most of their business was likely 'Decent Locals' (a) and thus, taxes on casino revenue are 'elastic' --but it could just as easily be the case that patronage is down because of unemployment/foreclosures and any "price hike" at Stations was a result, not the cause, of reduced patronage.)


    Rich Bergeron wrote on February 24, 2009 10:06 PM: This is exactly what the Fertittas did with Xyience, Incorporated:

    www.xyiencesucks.com


    jcm wrote on February 24, 2009 09:37 PM: elizabeth,
    i understand her point ENTIRELY.
    you should take an economics course before
    you shoot your mouth off. please tell me your opinion on if you feel the tax on casino revenue is elastic or inelastic ? let me guess, you don't have a clue what i am talking about.


    Dr J wrote on February 24, 2009 04:45 PM: They can't finish their strip boon doggle and want to buy bankrupt station casino's? Uh, wha's up what that????


    Read All Comments