Quantcast
MobileRJ | RSS TwitterTwitter FacebookFacebook E-mail Alerts
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News
Mar. 03, 2009
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

2004 FATAL CRASH: Lawyer says pharmacists liable

State high court asked to reinstate wrongful death case

By ED VOGEL
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU

CARSON CITY -- A Southern Nevada lawyer told the state Supreme Court on Monday that pharmacists, at the least, had a duty to call physicians to voice their concerns before dispensing a narcotic painkiller to a woman who killed a man in a 2004 vehicle crash in Las Vegas.

"They had a duty to control her conduct," lawyer Phil Aurbach told justices. "They had absolute knowledge that prescription abuse was involved."

Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




    • Aurbach said pharmacists continued to fill prescriptions for Patricia Copening even after being warned by a state task force that she might be a prescription drug abuser.

    Copening killed 21-year-old Gregory Sanchez Jr. in a June 4, 2004, crash on U.S. Highway 95.

    Aurbach asked justices to reinstate the wrongful death case he seeks to file against seven chain-store pharmacies who filled Copening's prescriptions.

    District Judge Douglas Herndon earlier threw out the case on the grounds that the pharmacies were not legally liable in the crash.

    The Supreme Court made no decision Monday. Justices Mark Gibbons and Jim Hardesty made comments seemingly in support of Aurbach's position.

    Gibbons said a doctor mistakenly might prescribe strychnine that would kill the user. Then Gibbons posed the questions: "Does the pharmacist just fill it and let someone die? Or does the pharmacist call the doctor to see if that is what you intended?"

    Aurbach represents the families of Sanchez and Robert Martinez.

    Sanchez, a father of two, was killed and Martinez severely injured in the crash. Sanchez had pulled his vehicle off U.S. 95 after it had a flat tire, and Martinez pulled his car behind him to help change the tire.

    Their vehicles were struck by a vehicle driven by Copening, who was found to be under the influence of hydrocodone, a narcotic pain reliever. She spent nine months in jail as a result.

    An investigation found many different pharmacies had filled prescriptions for 4,800 tablets of the drug for Copening in the 13 months before the crash.

    Aurbach said the pharmacies continued to fill her prescriptions even though the Nevada Prescription Controlled Substance Abuse Task Force notified them that Copening was "taking an unusual amount of these narcotics."

    Aurbach said the woman received 1,000 to 1,600 additional tablets of hydrocodone after the notice was given to pharmacies.

    "Some of them threw it away," Aurbach said about the notice. "None of them made a note (in their records) that Patricia Copening may have a narcotics abuse problem."

    Aurbach wants to sue pharmacies operated by Wal-Mart, Longs Drugs, Walgreen Co., CVS Pharmacy, Rite-Aid, Sav-On and Lam's Pharmacy.

    In defending the pharmacies, lawyer Mike Wall said Aurbach had been shopping around for "deep pockets" before deciding on suing pharmacies.

    Wall said the pharmacists have the same protection as bartenders.

    Under court decisions and the state "dram shop" law, bartenders are not liable if the people to whom they serve drinks are later involved in crashes in which others are injured or killed.

    Wall said a pharmacist is not there to "second-guess a registered physician."

    He said that even if pharmacists had called the physicians after being given prescriptions for Copening, they probably would not have canceled the prescriptions.

    At the time of the crash, Copening was driving a vehicle owned by OB/GYN Associates.

    The license of one of that business's owners, Dr. D.S. Steele, was revoked for various reasons, including giving Copening prescriptions while they were involved in a sexual relationship.

    "A call to a doctor would have done nothing anyway," Wall said. "There is no indication it would have any effect whatsoever."

    Nonetheless, Hardesty said that because of the state task force notice that Copening might be a prescription drug abuser, pharmacists had a reason to call doctors about her prescriptions.

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 21 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Ed wrote on March 03, 2009 10:53 PM: Sue fork & spoon manufacturers for making people fat while you're at it.

    IDIOT.


    paula_nurse_alturas wrote on March 03, 2009 03:37 PM: aboy. whats next suing all the sellers of booze, for the fools who have duis.

    lawyers and diaper pudding,all the same.


    meh wrote on March 03, 2009 01:52 PM: Shoot the b!tch. Then shoot the ambulance-chaser. Then shoot a few justices. Then shoot a whole bunch of "representatives" until they understand what is happening.


    JD wrote on March 03, 2009 01:30 PM: Aint america grand!!! Hope i dont get sued for making this comment.


    Move away from the drugs wrote on March 03, 2009 10:51 AM: TO: End_Drug_Prohibition, Everything is wrong with the whole picture you described.

    There is nothing in your picture that slightly encourages me to see society go in that direction.


    That's right, enable her issues wrote on March 03, 2009 10:43 AM: There should be a counter suit, against family members who probably knew this woman had a drug dependency, but did nothing.

    Her husband, mother, father or siblings may have known she was abusing prescriptions but did nothing. If they didn't, that presents another set of issues.

    What a loser. The court system knows, drug addicted people never take responsibilty for their actions, and try to blame others.


    End_drug_prohibition wrote on March 03, 2009 10:41 AM: The license of .. Dr. D.S. Steele, was revoked for .. giving Copening prescriptions while they were involved in a sexual relationship.

    Doctors all allowed to sell (or trade) prescriptions. Politically influential large firms can design or distribute deadly narcotics. Wealthy whites are allowed to legitimitize their drug addictions as "medically necessary". Some poor slob goes to jail for selling pot, operating a crystal meth lab, or trading sex for crack.

    What is wrong with this picture?


    UNBELIEVABLE wrote on March 03, 2009 10:04 AM: "...Washington, who appeared in court, apologized to the victim. He explained that HE WAS INJURED WHILE ON THE JOB AND BECAME ADDICTED TO LORTAB, a prescription painkiller. Rather than seek help, he allowed his addiction to get out of hand, he said." (http://www.lvrj.com/news/39132417.html)

    Guess Marquis & Aurbach will be suing the pharmacies in the Eric Washington (Metro Fraud Cop) case AND the POLICE for KNOWING that Eric had an addiction?

    Oh, wait, don't M&A represent Metro?

    NEVER MIND.


    Richard Fisher wrote on March 03, 2009 10:00 AM: Is there no personal responsibility any more? It seems from this article that I can kill another human and simply get an attorney to duck out of the consequences of my actions. Not solely bashing lawyers here but hasn't lack of personal responsibility has gotten us as a nation in quite a bind lately.


    We need judicial reform wrote on March 03, 2009 08:54 AM: I'm with you Jack. We need oversight of attorneys and Judges and not the good ole boys at the state bar and JDC. Real oversight.

    Aurbach should be made to pay the fees. Of course that might cut into his tithes and green fees.


    Read All Comments