Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


FORECLOSURE CRISIS: Many Nevadans 'upside down' on mortgages

Bulk of homeowners in state unlikely to qualify for aid







A new report released Wednesday said nearly 60 percent of Las Vegas homeowners are "upside down" on their mortgages -- precisely the group of people who are least likely to benefit from the housing plan the Obama administration began detailing Wednesday.

A report from First American CoreLogic showed that 58.2 percent of home mortgages in Las Vegas have negative equity in which the loan balance exceeds the home's value.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • The report said Nevada has the highest percentage of "underwater" mortgage holders in the nation with more than a quarter of Nevadans, 28 percent, owing more than 125 percent of their home's value.

    Those are the people, too, who will not qualify for aid under President Barack Obama's plan, which restricts refinancing aid to borrowers whose first mortgage does not exceed 105 percent of the current market value of their homes.

    The administration's Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, which the Treasury Department on Wednesday began briefing lenders about, throws $75 billion at a problem that some say sparked the economic downturn.

    The plan aims to help as many as 9 million homeowners who are struggling to avoid foreclosure, but industry experts agreed few homeowners in Las Vegas and other hard-hit areas such as Phoenix and much of California, where home prices have tumbled more than 50 percent, are likely to qualify for the program.

    "It's not going to do a whole lot for people in Vegas," said Spencer Judd, a local attorney who specializes in loan modifications.

    "What happens with the second mortgage? There's nothing in there about (modifying) second mortgages. What will work? How do you get this done? This program is not a panacea, but we'll see."

    Mark Baker, loan officer at Meridias Capital in Las Vegas, thinks the foreclosure crisis is going to get much worse as even people with "golden" credit walk away from homes that can't be refinanced.

    Based on the 105 percent requirement, someone who owes more than $210,000 on a property that's worth $200,000, would not qualify for the program's refinancing option.

    "Up to 105 percent of the value," Baker said. "I think this will help a lot of people in the Las Vegas area. In fact, it may be more than three or four people, or even up to 10. Another example of how lots of talk, lots of money spent and so few people can use a new government program. Sorry for my sarcasm ... not really."

    Under Obama's plan, homeowners are generally eligible for refinancing or loan modifications if they are the owner-occupant of the home; the home is their primary residence; the home is not investor-owned; and the first-lien loan has an unpaid balance of less than $729,750.

    Any foreclosure action will be suspended during the loan modification trial period or while borrowers are considered for other options to prevent foreclosure. If these options fail, the foreclosure action may be resumed.

    The plan helps two groups by refinancing up to 5 million homeowners into more affordable fixed-rate loans and by working with lenders to modify the loan terms for up to 4 million homeowners.

    The first group consists of homeowners with "conventional" mortgages of $417,000 or less held by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Such borrowers are stuck paying higher interest rates and cannot refinance because their home value has shrunk and they are upside down on their loans.

    Shawna Kendall said she is upside down by $100,000 on her Las Vegas home. She lost her job as an independent contractor in the health care business, and her husband's income is down 40 percent.

    "I think I qualify," Kendall said. "I had applied for a loan modification. I've never been late with a payment, but they need to work with us if they don't want another foreclosure. You don't know how long it's going to take to recover."

    The refinancing program is offered only to homeowners with loans held by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. They have until June 2010 to apply.

    Consumers should contact their loan servicer, the company that sends out their monthly bill, to find out whether their mortgages are held by Fannie or Freddie.

    The two mortgage finance companies own or guarantee almost 31 million home loans, more than half of all U.S. home mortgages, and say they are lowering some fees to allow more borrowers to qualify.

    The second part of the Obama plan is intended to help modify loans for borrowers who have experienced economic hardship.

    For the modification program, which runs through 2012, borrowers who are eligible will have to provide their most recent tax return, two pay stubs and an "affidavit of financial hardship" to qualify. In the affidavit, applicants will have to cite the reasons behind their financial woes, such as job loss or a drop in income. The government will take steps to verify the information.

    Borrowers are allowed to have their loans modified once, and the program applies for loans made on Jan. 1, 2009, or earlier. Mortgages for single-family properties that are worth more than $729,750 are excluded.

    Lenders could reduce a borrower's interest rate to as low as 2 percent for five years. Rates then would rise to about 5 percent until the mortgage is repaid.

    If the plan works as intended, it could be a big plus for some borrowers.

    Dick and Marge Fazio of Las Vegas might fall into that category. He suffered a stroke, and she was laid off from her job in retail property management. Roughly one-third of their monthly income, mostly from temporary work and Social Security, goes toward their mortgage.

    Marge Fazio said she has been wondering whether they would qualify for aid from Obama's plan and has been researching it on the Internet.

    "I think the plan is good," she said. "The only thing that bothers me is I'd like to know who's actually read the 1,100 pages of information. I feel it'll work, but there's so many variables."

    She said she read about CitiMortgage reducing mortgage payments to $500 a month for laid-off homeowners, but a person has to be six months in default.

    "Give those of us who lost our job a break. We're trying to do the right thing," she said.

    Though banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo & Co. issued statements Wednesday praising the plan, there was skepticism that banks would be willing to participate.

    "I've just seen so many of the programs not work," said Pava Leyrer, president of Heritage National Mortgage in Grandville, Mich. "It gets borrowers' hopes up. They call and call for these programs, and we can't get anybody to do them."

    Rick Simon, spokesman for Countrywide Home Loans in Calabasas, Calif., added that no should expect banks to modify loans for people who are not going to be able to sustain home ownership, he said.

    "We don't know what that program will do and how other programs are affected," Simon said. "We need to see the guidelines, how the administration is going to handle the rights of investors to have a decision in how to do these workouts, whether investors are forced into this or still have a right of approval."

    Simon said the industry favors the "general terms" of the plan's affordability index formula, which sets monthly home payments at 38 percent of household income. The government will share 7 percent of the cost to take mortgages down to 31 percent.

    Critics of Obama's foreclosure plan say it will reward delinquent borrowers, many of whom should not have received mortgages in the first place, while responsible borrowers who continue to make their monthly home payments gain nothing.

    More details on the plan can be found at www.financialstability.gov.

    Contact reporter Hubble Smith at hsmith@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0491. Review-Journal writer Jennifer Robison and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    What you need to know

    Q: How do I know if I qualify for home loan modification?

    A: To apply for modification, you must:

    be an owner-occupant in a one- to four-unit property;

    have an unpaid principal balance that is equal to or less than $729,750 for one unit;

    have a loan that was originated before Jan. 1, 2009;

    have a mortgage payment, including taxes, insurance and homeowners association dues, that is more than 31 percent of your gross monthly income;

    have a mortgage payment that is no longer affordable, perhaps because of a significant change in income or expenses.

    Q: How do I know if I am eligible to refinance?

    A: You may be eligible if:

    you are the owner-occupant of a one- to four-unit home;

    the loan on your home is owned or controlled by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac;

    you are current on your mortgage payments (not more than 30 days late in the past 12 months);

    the amount you owe on your first mortgage is no more than 105% of the current value of your house;

    you have a stable income sufficient to support the new mortgage payments.

    Q: What if I'm in bankruptcy or in active litigation over my mortgage?

    A: You do not qualify for refinancing, but the situation doesn't necessarily keep you from qualifying for the modification program. And borrowers in litigation can modify their home loans without waiving their legal rights.

    For more information lvrj.com/borrower_qa.pdf
    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 82 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    karan wrote on November 03, 2009 09:43 PM: I am upside down and I have a ARM that will rise in March 2010. I have been making payment on time for almost 6 years in march. I need to refinance desperately. I am trying to take care of this issue before it become a hugh problem for me and I cannot afford the new payments.


    Susan Ashe wrote on April 01, 2009 03:28 PM: If I am upside-down $300,000 on two homes in foreclosure, will I have to pay taxes on any "loan forgiveness" after the bank owns and sells the property?

    If so, how can I pay taxes if I can't pay the mortgages? The tax penalty is overwhelming...


    Sion wrote on March 27, 2009 12:07 PM: It's Great, and I do appreciate the Information, and I hope this will help many of us that drowning in this big mess. Please, to other Firms that can lead us into the right path to solve our mortgage crisis, before we will drown.
    I'm in this boat, please anybody who can help, I do Appreciate. please email me. Sion.myagent@gmail.com
    Thank You.


    Jim Davey wrote on March 11, 2009 10:50 AM: To Hubble Smith, LVRJ,

    Great article! Thanks. Please clarify the qualifications for me; 12th paragraph of article says "the home is not investor-owned; and the first-lien loan has an unpaid balance of less than $729,750." I fall into the arena of needing a modification.

    Question 1=Regarding investor-owned; my mortgage servicer Countrywide says the loan is investor owned by Bank of New York; which Countrywide claims turned down my formal written request (through Countrywide) for a modification in January; any chance Countrywide can reverse that, or Bank of New York will reconsider? (I noted today Bank of New York is returning millions to the government because it does not want to accept government rules.)

    Question 2=Does the jumbo limit of $417,000 for Clark County apply, or does this program raise the mortgage limit to $729,750 here in Clark County?

    FYI; When I got the 60 month pay option ARM in November, 2006 I had a 790 FICO, I put down $155,000 cash, so I was not a subprime borrower ... my jumbo mortgage was $450,452.00 and it is only an additional $5,577.47 negative amortization today; we did get a second mortgage of $75,000.00 which we spent to make an addition on the house; then my employer was bought out in July, 2007 and we were all let go; my retirement pension and my wife's total disability social security incomes are steady, but my unemployment will end, and we will no longer be able to keep up mortgage payments on the home which is now worth about the exact amount of the first and second mortgages. At 62 now (and not eligible for social security myself) it seems impossible to find work here in Mesquite, so we are very interested and concerned.

    Thanks for any possible answers and/or comment!


    Liberals Never Understand wrote on March 05, 2009 10:29 PM: So Judy in 8 years under Bush the Dow dropped roughly fourty percent, which is bad. But under the Messiah the Dow has dropped TWENTY percent in your "one month" think about that. Can you hold the Messiah accountable? Maybe by next month Obama will have eclipsed Bush's 40%............................................


    Vicky S wrote on March 05, 2009 10:22 PM: And now for a simple math presentation....

    Is everyone paying attention?

    Jobs + Money =Paid Mortgage

    Even the most affordable home cannot be paid without a job.

    Does anyone have a number on how many jobs have been eliminated in Vegas during the last year?

    Lets not forget that the lower level jobs that people would normally run to during an economic downturn are ALREADY filled by seniors that have gone back to work, teens that are working to help support their families during this economic crisis, and lets not forget illegal undocumented workers.

    Oh, and if your resume says that you were some hot shot whatever and you apply at Walmart/Burger King/7-11 you have a snowballs chance in hell of getting hired.

    The casinos and resorts are not hiring...hospitality is at a standstill, construction has gone under, tradeshows are smaller than ever.





    Good Call wrote on March 05, 2009 10:15 PM: BING BING BING BING

    We have a winner!

    Jaz wrote on March 05, 2009 08:30 PM:
    I don't think this administration really knows what it's doing.

    It's being too "politically correct" with the left to make real change. First the stimulus bill that is somehow supposed to put a "shot in the arm" to the economy when it's really just wasted pork spending for Democrat pet projects, it's raising taxes while in a deep recession (always proven to be a bad idea), its scaring everyone out of their wits with all this talk of "looming depression coming" and "Crisis!" and now this much anticipated mortgage reform bill that doesn't reform anything for most.

    It seems either just like clever talk, out and out fraud, or just being too dumb to figure out what really should be done.

    Is there anything like a mulligan in the Presidential Election process?


    Free Nevada wrote on March 05, 2009 09:12 PM: (@'huh', citizen 'Tony' had suggested we only erase negative-equity of people who made good judgments and I responded that the 14th Amendment's 'equal protection under the law' clause forbids government (but not businesses) from taking sides like that. What you are now raising is a different concern, which is the constitutionality of taking out a bond to allow the use of future transfer-tax revenues to invest in current negative-equity liens because not all the properties would be candidates for such investments, which is not a 14th Amendment issue. Legally, my idea is analogous to a county property surtax for extra fire protection in a burn-risk area.)


    Judy wrote on March 05, 2009 08:45 PM: Folks like Jaz voted for Bush and never held him accountable. He leaves a huge mess and she wants to give Obama one month to clean it up? Get real Jaz.

    President Obama has done more to improve this economy in the past month than Bush ever did. Bush drove us into the ground.


    huh wrote on March 05, 2009 08:33 PM: yeah blame bush. lol


    Read All Comments