Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


State's work force growing

Nevada's surge in labor base comes in softening job market

The recession might have curbed population growth in Nevada, but new numbers show the Silver State's work force still grew at a brisk pace in the past year, and that might not be good news for the state's workers.

Clark County lost 10,000 residents between July 2007 and July 2008, officials say, yet the labor force in Las Vegas grew 4.5 percent year over year in January, from 972,100 to 1.02 million. Statewide, the labor base jumped 4 percent in the same period, from 1.35 million to 1.41 million.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford




  • Local economists say the local work force continues to grow for several reasons, and unabated expansion could mean steadily rising unemployment for some time to come and a bigger buyers' market for employers seeking workers.

    Experts do not have concrete details on what's behind the surge in the state's labor base, but they guessed at a handful of demographic shifts that could be driving up the worker pool.

    First, retirees probably have re-entered the work force as the value of assets including homes and 401(k)s has plummeted, said Jared McDonald, an economist with the state's Department of Employment, Training & Rehabilitation. And stay-at-home spouses are likelier to pound the pavement as their partners receive pink slips or see their office hours cut, he added.

    Keith Schwer, executive director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, counted both retirees and stay-at-home spouses in his tally of reasons the work force grew, and he threw in new graduates of local high schools and colleges as another contributor.

    And Jeremy Aguero, a principal in local economic-research firm Applied Analysis, cited all of those groups plus the possibility of slight population growth.

    Aguero said that local power utility NV Energy posted a 0.7 percent gain in the number of electric-meter hookups in January when compared with the same month a year earlier. That indicates that the city has more occupied homes than it had a year ago, which in turn hints at some population growth.

    Thanks to those factors, the state's numbers, which researchers obtain through measuring unemployment claims and surveying households and businesses, show a surplus of job candidates flooding a soft hiring market and competing for comparatively fewer jobs.

    Add in the rampant job loss that is also pushing up unemployment figures, and Nevada probably will see a sustained increase in joblessness, economists say.

    As unemployment rises, salaries could fall, and employers could enjoy an even better buyers' market if they want to upgrade or round out their work forces. The possible result: changes in how companies weigh the status of their staffs, Aguero said.

    "Employers may not be thinking about expanding, but the new consideration is whether they have the right group of employees," Aguero said. "With such a large pool of workers available, and with the potential for downward pressure on wages, employers could be forced into the question of whether one employee is the right employee, or whether they could hire someone with a better skill set at a lower cost."

    Schwer said he thinks most companies will stick with the staffs they have assembled. Unless a worker seriously underperforms, the expense of turnover and training could cost more than a business would save in lower pay.

    "Companies want people who show up for work, and they want people who know their business," Schwer said. "They're not going to just lay people off in order to get somebody else because there's a lot of economic benefit to having people working for you who know your company or who are trained."

    Not counted in either unemployment statistics or work force numbers are discouraged workers: people who quit job-hunting altogether because they have searched for months to no avail.

    Researchers track figures on discouraged workers only at the national level, so the state's department of employment does not have details on how many Nevadans have quit the work force. But McDonald said it's likely that increasing numbers of Nevadans have halted their job searches, though a growing labor force would seem to counter the idea that more people have opted out of the job market.

    Economists say the numbers don't always match; a work force can expand even as the ranks of the discouraged rise.

    Nationally, unemployment in February was 8.1 percent, with a 0.4 percent rate of discouraged workers on top of that jobless figure. McDonald said Nevada, which reported 9.4 percent unemployment in January, probably has a discouraged-worker rate similar to the national average, though he wouldn't count out a slightly higher statewide percentage.

    "We seem to be getting hit especially hard by this recession," he said.

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    HelenWeils wrote on March 12, 2009 03:41 PM: You're right, Patrick. And with the legislature poised to instigate a small business tax, it's not going to get any better. Once the Union strongarm law goes into effect, it will devaste the restaurant industry in particular.


    RON wrote on March 12, 2009 12:48 PM: NOW WE ALL WANT CHANGE .....


    Joe Bama wrote on March 12, 2009 11:33 AM: What do you consider low skill hmm anything that you don't do?


    Americanmexican wrote on March 12, 2009 10:16 AM: Why, not hire more people to handle the illegal alien issue. It would help everyone. Hiring people to handle the apprehension and drivers to bus them out, and then with the vacuum created American workers will take the jobs. "American" not mexican. Wake up people their dragging us down to their level. And as a "real" American of mexican decent i could get the job at Mcdonalds or wherever. Change i can believe in.


    Patrick wrote on March 12, 2009 09:33 AM: People earn low wages because the have no skills.

    Wages rise as they learn new skills and become more productive.

    Most people who remain low skilled are that way because of welfare, ironically. Welfare programs terminate if they earn too much so these people game the system to maximize their utility. Unfortunately it harms them in the long run.

    By holding infrequent jobs for short periods of time they do not build the skills and work experience necessary to command a higher wage.


    hmm wrote on March 12, 2009 08:41 AM: If your a LOW wage, LOW skill worker then why do you stay that way?? Just curious?? i.e. secretary, construction, service, hospitality? I am looking for honest answers please..


    locke wrote on March 12, 2009 08:28 AM: In (economic) theory, no one can take a job from someone else. It is different, however, at the bottom of the business cycle. Jobs are few, and takers are many. Here in Henderson, I frequent a few fast food places. They are staffed by illegals. These places have stacks of applications from citizens, but they have already trained these people, and they have proved their worth to the bottom line. I know many of them socially. We live in the same neighborhood, and send our kids to the same baby-sitter. They all in theory had at some point the intention of returning to Mexico. Now, none of them even revisit the illusion. It is too good here, especially for their children. This newspaper takes a "law and order" approach to such cases on its editorial page, but does not spend any columns investigating these issues. A lot of people I know would now not mind these jobs, to which they have a legal right to undertake.


    Patrick wrote on March 12, 2009 08:09 AM: The higher minimum wage is no doubt crippling our ability to put people back to work. With the wage rising again this summer we won't see unemployment among low skilled workers drop any time soon, especially in hard hit areas like Las Vegas.


    The Count wrote on March 12, 2009 07:23 AM: In the count the illegals are being counted as part of the workforce and i feel sure more are on the way.

    As for the others. The fact is a lot of people don't have a clue as to what is going on in the nation. They were moving here in droves. A lot of them figured they will supplement their income gambling. (I have actually heard that.) Their plan fails to work out then they pick up and leave poorer than when they got here.


    Thomas A. Carpenter wrote on March 12, 2009 07:19 AM: Come December 2010 when I'm able to retire you can add my name to the list of those who have left. Its getting crazier by the day. I just hope I hang on till then.......


    Read All Comments