Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Friday
Mar 12, 2010
Mostly Clear
Mostly Clear 56° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


DROUGHT LINGERS: Lake sinking near 1965 level

Decline of another 30 feet will trigger federal shortage declaration

Another below-average year on the Colorado River will soon shrink Lake Mead to a level not seen since President Lyndon Johnson unveiled his "Great Society" and the Beatles bared their "Rubber Soul."

By next month, the surface of the lake is expected to sink below 1,100 feet above sea level for the first time since May 1965, according to the latest projections from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Reid's wife, daughter hospitalized after accident
  2. Rulffes says school layoffs likely
  3. Doctors: Outlook 'very good' for Landra Reid
  4. School Board dismisses critics
  5. Cop sitcom eyes Las Vegas actors
  6. Boulder City constable arrested on felony charges
  7. Gibbons rejects four-day work week
  8. Phantom recalls former co-star
  9. Experts: Dangers await Las Vegas if city fires, rehires workers
  10. Mother, her boyfriend charged in child's death




And the decline won't stop there. By July, the reservoir on the Nevada-Arizona border is projected to shrink more than 13 feet from its current level of 1,105 feet above sea level.

That's more than 8 feet lower than forecasters were predicting just one month ago. The news has water managers and marina operators scrambling to deal with the immediate effects and bracing for what could come next if drought conditions don't improve along the Colorado River.

"We have to hope we have a decent spring. Otherwise we're headed for uncharted territory," said J.C. Davis, spokesman for the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

The lake is now 30 feet away from elevation 1,075, the trigger point for a federal shortage declaration that would force Nevada, Arizona and Mexico to reduce their combined water use by 400,000 acre-feet a year. Nevada's share would be 13,000 acre-feet, roughly the amount of water used each year by 26,000 average Las Vegas homes.

Davis said the water authority has sufficient reserves to cover such a shortage for a decade or more, though tapping some of that "banked" water could prove difficult should the lake continue to shrink.

The Las Vegas Valley gets about 90 percent of its drinking water from the Colorado by way of Lake Mead. The authority is in the midst of building a third straw that will reach deep into the lake and allow water to be drawn even if the two existing intakes are forced to shut down. The $817 million construction project is slated for completion in 2013.

"We're going to continue to race against Mother Nature to get that third intake done," Davis said.

A sharp drop in the lake level poses more immediate concerns for the National Park Service and its concession holders at Lake Mead.

"This is going to be problematic," said Jim Holland, park planner for Lake Mead National Recreation Area. "It's going to cost a lot of money to accommodate a 10-foot drop in such a short amount of time."

None of the privately operated marinas will be forced to relocate altogether this time around, Holland said, but several of them will have to move out into deeper water.

Several of the park's boat ramps, access roads and utility lines might need to be extended to reach the receding water line, Holland said.

As a rule, each 20-foot drop in the lake level costs the park service and its contract marina operators about $6 million, said Andrew Muñoz, spokesman for the recreation area.

Since 2000, Lake Mead has dropped more than 100 feet. But even at less than half full, the reservoir remains enormous, with some 500 miles of shoreline and 89,400 acres of open water that is up to 300 feet deep in places.

"It's still the best place for freshwater recreation in the Southwest," Holland said.

Just don't go out on the water expecting to find everything right where it was the last time you were there.

"The hazards are in different places. Where the water was deep, now it's shallow," Holland said.

A good rule of thumb: "Treat Lake Mead as if this visit is your first visit," he said.

In 1965, the last time the lake shrank below elevation 1,100, much of the Colorado's flow was being used to fill Lake Powell for the first time.

The culprit this time is an ongoing drought that has delivered below average snowfall to the Rocky Mountains and below average snowmelt to the Colorado River during eight of the past 10 years.

In four of the past eight years, the river has received little more than half of its normal runoff. In 2004, the inflow was 45 percent of average. In 2002, it was 30 percent of average, marking the river's driest year in a century.

This year's snowpack started close to average and then fell back to about 88 percent before recovering slightly in the past few weeks, said federal water supply forecaster Angus Goodbody. He expects a final inflow number somewhere near 90 percent of normal.

"We see it edging up a little bit, but not a whole lot," said Goodbody, who monitors snowfall data from hundreds of samplers throughout the Rockies. "It's close enough to average to be an average year."

The trouble is, even in an average year, less water flows into Lake Mead than flows out through Hoover Dam to fill water orders in California, Arizona and Mexico. And after almost a decade of deep drought, the only way to refill Mead and Powell is with several years of near-record runoff.

Until then, water managers and park officials are left to continue their costly work, chasing the shifting shore.

Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Leave Your Comment 53 Reader Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Current Word Count:

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

Report abuse

John & Sue Knox wrote on April 24, 2009 09:16 PM: After ten years of this, wouldn't it be more accurate to call this 'the new climate' as calling it a drought (as we are in Australia - it seems we're not immune to this condition) just leads to the expectation that things will necessarily get better.
This, in turn, leads to complacency on the part of government and the population at large. What is needed is a reduction in the amount of water drawn off, so that there is indeed enough in future.


Report abuse

average smarts wrote on April 23, 2009 08:53 AM: OK water police, your theory it sounds simple, but to amount of energy to run a pump like that (to displace that much water) would be about as much energy as the Hoover Dam produces. Remember mass-energy equivalence, e=mc squared? Jeeeze. A high school graduate could see that is not feasable.


Report abuse

perry wrote on April 18, 2009 05:41 AM: let guild solar and wind turbine field hell harry reid sign on to a wind turbine field in searchlight


Report abuse

the water police wrote on April 16, 2009 04:40 PM: So here is the solution. Put a big pump on the other side of the dam by the spill way and run a big hose from the pump back up over the dam and back into Lake Mead. That will replenish the water that is lost through the dams turbines and fill up Lake Mead in no time flat. Jeeeze. A two year old could have figured that out. Problem solved.


Report abuse

David wrote on April 16, 2009 01:16 PM: Why do you start with "Another below-average year on the Colorado River"? According to US government sources, this is incorrect. I refer you to the National Water and Climate Center of the US Dept of Agriculture. Their WEB site is http://www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/reports/SelectUpdateReport.html
Select the Colorado River basin and the Precipitation Update report. Run it for today, and december 31 for the past 5 years. You will find each periods year to date totals run from 103% to 113% of normal. The problem is not below normal rain, it is the use of the water along the way. Don't blame the climate. That is totally wrong. Don't perpetuate the liberal lies.


Report abuse

Jim Runyon wrote on April 16, 2009 09:10 AM: I was wondering why we could not pump some of the river water up from the river to the lake to maintain the lakes level from time to time. They were planning on catching the water at the Delta near the BAJA and moving it back up river. This would make perfect sense when you think about it.We could pump it to the marina area and maybe make a waterfall for kids to play in. Artificial lake,artificial level?


Report abuse

Rob wrote on April 15, 2009 02:02 PM: Billy you are right...I was in Phoenix for baseball spring training, and they were talking that they were going to have to close some streets to allow water being release from reservoirs because they were all going over their banks...They also mentioned that Lake Powell was going the need to force a release because it was over it's max.


Report abuse

Rob wrote on April 15, 2009 01:58 PM: If Saudi Arabia can have DESALINATION why can't we? I contacted Harry Reid's Office and was told that it was tried in the 1950's and no one wanted it...I nearly fell off my chair...I cannot believe that the people of the southwest do not want this now...(THAT WAS 50 years ago) The pipeline used to take water from the Colorado river to California could be used to bring water to Phoenix and even piped a short distance north to Las Vegas...This would solve all of the water needs...


Report abuse

Joe Bama wrote on April 14, 2009 11:53 PM: @Free Nevada i drank two beers first:)


Report abuse

InTheTrenches wrote on April 14, 2009 10:30 PM: "I believe losing the hydro-
electric power is more of a worry than
water. Once we lose that power will
Las Vegas not become a ghost town?"
Keep in mind people, Las Vegas utilizes only a small portion of hydroelectric power. Most of that power generated is sold off to California and Arizona. Hmmmm, but why then would our rates be increasing....


Read All Comments