Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Sunday
Sep 5, 2010
Sunny
Sunny 98° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


2009 LEGISLATURE: Domestic partners bill clears Senate, 12-9

Votes too few to override governor's threatened veto




CARSON CITY -- On a 12-9 vote Tuesday night, the state Senate passed a bill to allow domestic partners, gay and straight, most of the same rights as married couples.

But the 12 votes for the bill are less than the 14 required to override a veto by Gov. Jim Gibbons, who recently said he will kill the bill if it gets to his desk.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Angle faces copyright lawsuit over R-J articles
  2. Woman found dead amid clutter became compulsive
  3. Body of promoter Arum's son found in Washington mountains
  4. Fator grows his audience on road
  5. Border Patrol finds success in curbing illegal immigration, targets Las Vegas
  6. Man arrested after false bomb threat
  7. Employee focus of an earlier inquiry
  8. NLV judge: Some cases not being prosecuted
  9. Homicide at Sunrise Children's Hospital fuels speculation
  10. UNLV-Wisconsin: No. 12 Badgers beat Rebels 41-21 at Sam Boyd Stadium




"I feel very good," said Sen. David Parks after his Senate Bill 283 was approved with the support of Democrats.

"This is important given the mood of what is happening in the country. Nevada, like many other states, is moving in the right direction."

Parks, D-Las Vegas, said his concern now is seeing the bill pass in the Assembly. He then plans to drum up additional Senate support to counter a Gibbons' veto.

"I will deal with it," he said. "It is like any other bill."

Nevada would become the 10th state with a domestic partnership law if the bill is approved. The proposed legislation would allow same-sex and opposite-sex couples to register as domestic partners with the secretary of state.

Some of the benefits domestic partners would gain include the ability to make health care and funeral decisions for each other; hospital and jail visitation rights now reserved for family members; rights involving wills, inheritances and trusts; and the same parental rights as married couples.

The bill says a "domestic partnership is not a marriage" as defined by the Protection of Marriage constitutional amendment approved by voters in 2002. The amendment states that a marriage must be between a man and a woman.

Parks said that he has received 1,500 e-mail messages about his bill and that many contend it violates the 2002 amendment. Parks said an opinion from legislative lawyers found that the bill does not conflict with that amendment.

Ten of 12 Senate Democrats backed the bill, while seven of nine Republicans opposed it.

Sen. John Lee, D-North Las Vegas, and Sen. Terry Care, D-Las Vegas, voted against the bill. Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, and Sen. Mike McGinness, R-Fallon, supported it.

Lee said he voted against the bill because some couples would use domestic partnership as "trial marriages," instead of actually marrying.

In explaining his vote, Townsend said, "I respect what the bill has to offer, and I respect peoples' choices."

Senate Minority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, called SB283 the "most contentious bill" of the session.

He proposed an amendment that would have gutted most of bill and would have created a domestic relations contract to allow same-sex partners to make inheritance, medical and funeral decisions for each other.

Raggio said that he has talked with friends who are domestic partners and that they said Parks' bill goes too far. The rights they want and really need concern medical, inheritance and funeral decisions, he said.

The minority leader also said that domestic partnerships as defined in the bill are the same thing as marriages.

"A rose is a rose is a rose by any other name that you call it," Raggio said.

Parks countered by saying that domestic partners would have to hire lawyers to execute domestic relations contracts.

In an earlier interview, he said it would cost domestic partners $5,000 in legal fees to secure the rights granted to married couples.

Raggio's amendment was defeated 11-10.

Richard Ziser, the Nevada Concerned Citizens lobbyist who led the drive for the Protection of Marriage amendment, doubts that Parks can pick up two votes to override a Gibbons' veto.

"He has gotten as many votes as he can," Ziser said in a phone interview.

Ziser thinks Republicans McGinness and Townsend backed the bill because term limits prevent them from running again. As a result, they will not face voter backlash for their positions.

And while Parks might have a legal opinion that his bill does not violate the Protection of Marriage amendment, Ziser said, other lawyers may disagree. If the domestic partnership bill becomes law, it could be challenged.

Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, hailed the Senate vote.

"I am heartened the bill passed but wished it would have passed by a bigger margin," he said.

"It is hard to fathom why it is at all controversial. All it would do is give domestic partners the recognition they deserve and the ability to live their lives responsibly and with dignity."

While the governor has made his opposition to the bill clear, first lady Dawn Gibbons backed domestic partnerships during a Tuesday evening reception in the Nevada Room, adjacent to the Governor's Mansion, according to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance of Southern Nevada and The Center.

The two are divorcing. Dawn Gibbons now lives in an apartment above the Nevada Room, where the governor and the first lady frequently hold receptions.

The bill's Senate approval came as legislators acted on dozens of measures in efforts to meet a Tuesday deadline for approving bills or seeing them end up on the 2009 session's scrap heap.

The state Assembly was done first with its deadline-day work, passing 25 bills and keeping about 15 others alive by calling for more committee discussion. About a dozen other bills died.

The Senate held several floor sessions, including a final one that ran into the night, approving about 20 bills, holding three for more committee debate and rejecting another proposal.

The dead Assembly bills included AB34, to allow some state prison inmates who lost the use of personal typewriters limited Internet access; and AB35, making it tougher for a sex offender to be released from lifetime supervision.

Also shelved were AB42, helping authorities get access to medical records to prevent Medicaid fraud; and AB189, doubling Nevada's five-day period during which tenants can stay in rented homes or apartments before being subject to an eviction order for nonpayment.

One rejected Senate bill, SB301, would have stopped industrial development in an area north of Nellis Air Force Base.

Bills that were endorsed in the Senate on deadline included SB252, authorizing police to have access to sealed court records of applicants for police jobs; and SB269, which provides for immediate license suspensions of medical professionals convicted of felonies related to their practices.

Also approved and routed to the Assembly was SB292, to require courts to appoint attorneys who would act in children's best interest during cases involving abuse, neglect or termination of parental rights.

Also approved in the Senate, on an 11-10 vote, was SB259, setting up a program for alternative licensing of teachers; and SB288, which requires the state Division of Industrial Relations to try to meet with and help families of workers killed on the job.

The Associated Press and Review-Journal reporter Molly Ball contributed to this report. Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Comments (77)

Share your thoughts on this story.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

X

Register to comment

* Indicates fields that are required
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Male Female

Already registered? Log in now

X

Already registered to comment?

Log in below
E-mail
Password

Forgot your password? | Register
X

Forgot your password?

Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

Email
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Report abuse

Wendy wrote on June 17, 2009 07:58 PM: To Ted, et al. Marriage is entirely about God. Marriage was instituted by God. Those who are under the impression that sinful relationships recorded in the Bible are pleasing to God, or tolerated by God should read again, or read for the first time, the Bible beginning to end. Men and women of faith (or not of faith) who sinned never anticipated the unintended consequences of sin. God is always right, and we are wrong except when we agree with God. Whether believers or no, God's word is still true. Marriage is designed by God for a man and woman union only, and God in the Bible makes plain same sex relations are indeed sin. The Bible also says that, in the last days, the world will say, let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. Psalm 2. Read the rest of the chapter for God's response. So, it is actually insanity to clamor against God and want to do away with what God says is right. As for what Christians do wrong, isn't it popular among Christian-haters to say to the God-fearing who dare to contradict evildoers, judge not, that ye be not judged? God is the Judge of all the earth, and all need to be reconciled to Him, as can be done by grace through faith in Christ, Who bore all our sin on the Cross and rose again for our justification. We can't get a better salvation than His imputed righteousness, esp. not with our dirty cloak of self-righteousness or curses against God, Who alone is righteous and holy. Be reconciled to God through Jesus Christ today. He is the only Way, Truth, and Life.


Report abuse

william shettler wrote on April 26, 2009 06:55 PM: I need a phone number or email address
for Terry Care. I always counted Terry as a personel friend and was shocked at his vote-


Report abuse

John wrote on April 24, 2009 12:41 PM: Raggio said he talked with friends that said the bill went to far? He is such a liar... I'm not gay but I can sit here and tell you I have never met a gay person that said they have too many rights. Don't lie Raggio I now support this bill!


Report abuse

Chandler_L wrote on April 24, 2009 06:45 AM: For all of you pet loving and God fearing people that think that people want to marry their pets:

If you take out a pet license, you already have more legal rights and obligations to your pet than LGBT people in committed relationships.

It is all about the dignity of the legal relationship. It is not about God and it is not about marriage.

It is a cloak for people who don't want LGBT people to have any legal protection AT ALL. If that is what you wanted, THAT is what you should have put in the Nevada Constitution.


Report abuse

John wrote on April 22, 2009 11:52 PM: what about the children??? who is thinking about the children??? my god the children????

people please I am tired of thinking about your kids and having to pay such taxes for your childrens schools and parks and guess what if this doesn't pass I hate to see what is going to happen. I think letting the world know that gays aren't welcomed in Vegas and a gay boycott of Vegas would be great in these tough economic times.. if it don't pass you wont have jobs and alot more time to think of the children...


Report abuse

Kelly wrote on April 22, 2009 09:35 PM: Let he who is without sin cast the first veto, eh' Governor? LOL


Report abuse

Cop Hater wrote on April 22, 2009 09:24 PM: We need to outlaw marriage all together. Marriage is a religious act. Why is the government allowed to license a religious act? Did you know the minister has to get a license to marry people too? What garbage. Marriage licenses started to allow inter-racial marriage because it was against the law to inter-racial marry.

Why not license baptism or a Temple recommend or First Holy Communion or a briss?

We need to get the government out of marriage and the way to do it is to end socialism. No more governemnt benefits for married people. SIMPLE. Gays get no rights they want because there aren't any and they don't have to pay for so-called good Christians government benefits they get from marriage.

If you want to get married in a Church... Great. If you want to marry a tree... great. As long as I don't have to pay for your marriage to a tree or in a church I DON'T CARE.

Now if we follow that with closing the Socialist propaganda mills called government schools we could actually step out from under the Religion of Marxism and start being a Christian Nation once again. Which is very difficult to do when none of the Neo-Christians are REAL Christians but only born again Marxists following the Communist Manifesto as their new Ten Commandments.

#2 Income Tax
#5 The Federal Reserve
#10 Free Government schools.

Stop licensing marriage! NOPE. The government makes to much money with licenses and divorces and family court and...get off the moral horse and follow the money trail. It's all about the money. It has nothing to do with who sleeps with whatever.


Report abuse

Jack.Webb wrote on April 22, 2009 09:19 PM: How many psyho Biblical figures had multiple handmaidens? Let's Get It On is a long-buried, Christian hymn.

And the psycho Christians want to shame us.

The psycho Christians are the enemy of America.


Report abuse

Max wrote on April 22, 2009 09:05 PM: I like this legislation and I think it comes from a good place. I like the idea that domestic couples will be able to make medical and funeral decisions for one another along with jail and inheritance decisions. I also like the idea that we don't have to get a lawyer involved to accomplish domestic partnership if this bill passes. I know the morality cops won't like the benefit to the gay community or probably even the non-gay community but I don't mind it even though I'm not gay. Heterosexual relationships stand to benefit too.

There are many reasons why heterosexual couples don't marry yet stay in romantic partnerships for years. One-sided divorce laws alone are enough to shoot down the idea of marriage for most men, especially after already experiencing a divorce previously. Couples that choose not to get married should have a say in their partner's life decisions if they so choose and if this legislation passes, now they can.

Long overdue for most of us but our idiot governor will veto this bill and there probably won't be enough votes to override. A shame really; an immoral governor and serial adulterer is allowed to veto bills based on his personal moral judgments. If that isn't hypocrisy I don't know what is. This governor can't get out of that office fast enough.


Report abuse

Nine Dancing Bigots wrote on April 22, 2009 08:57 PM: These Nine should be known as the Nine Dancing Bigots; they'll do pretty much anything for a vote. If it took siging to get a vote, they'd sing. If it took dancing to get reelected, they'd dance. If it takes being a hateful bigot to get votes, they'll be hateful bigots. They are people without principle.

Other than Barbara Cegavske, are any of the other Nine Dancing Bigots divorced?

Do any of the others have the audacity to claim they're protecting "traditional marriage" by denying fundamental rights to gays and lesbians??

The Nevada Senate's Nine Dancing Bigots

Mark Amodei Nay
Terry Care Nay
Barbara Cegavske Nay
Warren Hardy Nay
John Lee Nay
Dennis Nolan Nay
William Raggio Nay
Dean Rhoads Nay
Maurice Washington


Read More Comments