Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


UNLV community breathes a sigh of relief




It could have been worse, so there is relief among many in the state's higher education community.

There will not be massive layoffs. Important programs probably won't be lost in their entirety. Students will not be forking over twice as much to go to school next year, as some feared they would.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford




  • This was largely the reaction Wednesday to the Legislature's deal that seems to have spared the higher education system from cuts of more than a third, as proposed by Gov. Jim Gibbons as a way to avoid tax increases.

    "It's the first time in many, many months where we replaced uncertainty with a clearer picture of what's ahead of us," UNLV President David Ashley told a group of university employees Wednesday afternoon. "And I have to say, that feels pretty good to me."

    Lawmakers worked out a deal Tuesday that would cut the system's state support by 12.5 percent. Importantly, they also agreed to allow the institutions to keep whatever money they raise from a likely tuition increase; typically, nearly two thirds of such money goes into the state's general fund. Keeping that money means the cut will in effect be a little more than 10 percent, systemwide.

    "It could have been so much worse," said Sondra Cosgrove, the chair of the faculty senate at the College of Southern Nevada, the state's largest institution. "We've been worried."

    The cut is not a 12.5 percent cut over what was spent this fiscal year. It is a cut of 12.5 percent for the next two years when compared to what was approved in 2007, $1.3 billion for two years.

    Typically, the system's budget increases each year.

    It was budgeted for $885 million this year, but the budget was cut by about 8 percent before the year was in full gear because of the economy. Because this fiscal year does not end for another six weeks, system officials could not say Wednesday what actual spending will be this year. If 8 percent is subtracted from $885 million, you get about $814 million. Last year, system officials said, $807 million was spent systemwide.

    Officials said their budget, as approved by the legislative committees, is expected to be $792 million in the upcoming fiscal year and $804 million the next fiscal year. That would equate to about 3 percent less spending in the upcoming year compared to this year and about 1 percent less the year after that when compared to this year.

    All the while, officials note, expenses are going up. Enrollment continues to grow, systemwide, particularly at the community colleges. CSN, for example, saw growth of 10 percent this year.

    CSN's spokeswoman, K.C. Brekken, said it was still unclear Wednesday how the school would handle continued growth.

    "We're going to do everything we can to minimize the impact on our students," she said.

    University system Chancellor Jim Rogers insisted that all is not rosy. The cuts, he and other leaders say, will be hard. There will be pay cuts for some employees. There will probably be shortages of classes, meaning choices for students will be limited. Some might have to wait longer to graduate. There may even be enrollment caps. No one can say yet for sure.

    But tuition increases? They are certain, though by how much has yet to be decided.

    Tuition could jump by as much as 20 percent in the next two years.

    The Board of Regents, which governs the system, long ago approved an increase in tuition and fees that is already set to go into effect this Fall. It will go up by 5 percent this year and 5 percent next year.

    Regents are expected to discuss at a special meeting today whether to implement another increase.

    The figures being bandied about are 5 percent more this year and 5 percent more next year.

    In all, that could mean the cost of attending UNLV would jump by nearly $1,000 a year.

    Students have long known a tuition increase was likely. They even issued letters of support, through their elected leaders, in recent months -- with the stipulation that all the money raised should stay at the schools.

    Ashley, in what was billed as a town hall meeting open to all, addressed a crowd of well over 300 on Wednesday. Mostly, they seemed to be rank and file university employees. Very few students showed up, as they've already taken final exams and most have left campus.

    He said the cuts to UNLV look to be in the 14.5 percent range, after calculating how the overall higher education budget will be divvied up between the state's institutions. Those that grow faster -- like CSN -- are typically rewarded with more funding.

    It "doesn't feel terribly good," Ashley said, "but it's something we can deal with."

    He said that because the university's leaders already knew some sort of cuts were coming, they have been planning ahead. They've already had to cut 8 percent this year over what was initially approved, so they've been living with that.

    The university also offered buyouts, which dozens of employees took.

    That has left about 100 faculty positions empty; they will not be filled.

    About 1,000 class sections were cut, too. And it is likely that they won't be added back soon.

    Ashley said that because of all of this, the university could deal with a cut of around 8 to 10 percent without changing much.

    Add to that the money raised from a tuition increase -- systemwide, it's expected to be about $19 million -- and savings from state-mandated salary cuts to some employees, and the university should be fine without major upheaval, he said.

    He added that two-thirds of whatever money UNLV raises from a tuition increase will go directly to financial aid.

    Many of the other details, he said, will be decided after today's board meeting.

    All of this is contingent on the full Legislature endorsing the plan and then overriding the almost certain veto from the governor.

    Contact reporter Richard Lake at rlake@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0307.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 23 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    UNLV POLICE wrote on May 14, 2009 09:40 PM: Now chief Elique can promote another chief in his small "spec sized" agency. They already have three chiefs (administrators.)

    What a waste of state money!!!


    Interested Reader wrote on May 14, 2009 08:57 PM: I was interested in fljohngalt's recent posting. Unless I am mistaken he states that he is 36 years of age. It is interesting that he seems to espouse the ideals of the 1940's and 1950's, a period long before his birth!
    Is he unaware that the GI Bill (Servicemen's Readjustment Act, 1944) was the beginning of a huge US government investment in higher education, in a bid to prevent civil unrest as servicemen came back to an impoverished homeland and economy that could not offer them employment. It was that investment in higher education that led to the halcyon days to which he has only vicarious knowledge of.

    Accepting government data, an average retiree at 65 will have 13.1 years of benefits before they die, hardly the 30+ years suggested. But why let facts get in the way?

    As to him being tenured, that would require a degree of academic attainment that, based on his stated assumptions, is yet to occur.

    I am happy for him that he is content with his liquidity and net worth, I do not object to him being successful through hard work, but to assume that all government employees do not work as hard as he, is both disingenous and naive.

    It may surprise fljohngalt, that I am not of the political pursuasion that he suggests, quite the opposite in fact. As to Das Kapital, I prefer Groucho to Karl. Sorry to burst your bubble but the 1940's were hardly pre-union try pre-1900 for that! Before big government and balanced media, what about McCarthyism? Oh, and it wasn't until the 1960's that de jure segregation was prohibited. I can see why some people might long for the "good old days" but not I.

    Thank you for helping me demonstrate how important an education is. How about answering Steve T's question?


    Free Nevada wrote on May 14, 2009 07:22 PM: Just sell it all.


    GET READY NEVADA!!!!! wrote on May 14, 2009 04:08 PM: Get ready for a-

    MASSIVE
    INCREASE IN
    TAXES!!


    INCLUDING

    Higher Sales Taxes, New Service Tax, Huge Increase to Modified Business Tax



    OUR LEADERS WILL BE `COURAGEOUS’, `BOLD, & `PROGRESSIVE’ AND NEVADA TAXPAYERS WELCOME THESE NECESSARY INCREASES WITH OPEN ARMS.




    Dandini wrote on May 14, 2009 03:55 PM: BUT THEY STILL DON"T REALLY KNOW HOW THEY ARE GOING TO PAY FOR THIS FINANCIAL MESS!


    Steve T wrote on May 14, 2009 02:52 PM: fljohngalt: You didn't answer my question. do any of the students at you college get government financial aid, which in effect subsidizes your salary?

    and by the way, how does the pass rate on the CPA exam compare to the university of Illinois, or Missouri, or Wisconsin. I don't include UNLV because it is so underfunded it can't compete.


    Randy wrote on May 14, 2009 02:41 PM: Ken,

    I'm talking state politics. Republicans said they wouldnt raise taxes this time around. Taxes are going to be raised. So now I'm asking what did they get in return.

    Yes, Reid probably got something in return for his votes on Bush's policies.


    fljohngalt wrote on May 14, 2009 02:25 PM: Dear Interested Reader,

    Point #1 Government benefits (fixed pension and health care) for its workers continue until they die, which might be 30+ years for some workers. This easily outstrips the supposedly 'low pay' earned by government workers.

    Point #2 I earn less than a state university professor and I have no benefits because my university competes in the private sector and has streamlined its cost structure to do so, including the hiring of adjunct professors who cannot become tenured. The government universities are not competitive, if forced to compete; they would fail

    Point #3 I choose to work in the private sector and own a small business because I believe that I will better manage my money, I want to be rewarded for my hard work, and the less involvement I have with the government (whether in a job, in the business world, etc.); the better. I'll compare my net worth and liquidity at age 36 to any government worker of a similar education and work experience.

    Point #4 My business classes are popular because I teach the ideals that made America great: individual responsibility, love of country, strong moral values, and entrepreneurship. I recommend that Interested Reader put down Das Kapital or our Big Government Liberal President Obama's latest speech, and read about our nation's strength during the 40s and 50s, pre-union, pre-liberal values, pre-big government, pre-environmentalist, pro-military, balanced media, balanced education point of views, strong church attendance, etc.

    Give it a shot, you might actually learn to live on your own ability.


    Casino_Boss wrote on May 14, 2009 01:20 PM: I only need my employees to count to 21.


    Ken wrote on May 14, 2009 12:24 PM: Randy -- this must explain why Obergruppenfuhrer Reid and the Democrat controlled Congress gave George Bush all the money he wanted for Iraq and every other problem Democrats blame on the GOP.

    Nice try but you can't have it both ways. Either Bush is responsible for all evil in the world (the Olbermann theory) and rolled the Democrats for 8 years, or the Dems are equally responsible for this mess we are in now.


    Read All Comments