MobileRJ | RSS TwitterTwitter FacebookFacebook E-mail Alerts
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News
May. 19, 2009
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Poll finds half oppose law allowing civil unions

By ED VOGEL
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
More Info



Graphic by Mike Johnson.

CARSON CITY -- Democrats and independents back efforts in the Legislature to allow same- and opposite-sex domestic partnerships. But because of the overwhelming Republican opposition, Nevadans overall reject such civil unions by a 12 percentage point margin, according to a poll conducted for the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

The poll, which did not gather opinions about gay marriage itself, found 38 percent of Nevadans favor domestic partner legislation, while 50 percent oppose it and the remainder are undecided.

Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream




    • Democrats back the plan, incorporated in Senate Bill 283, by a 46 percent to 36 percent margin, while independents support it 47 percent to 42 percent.

    But Republicans oppose the proposal by a 71 percent to 23 percent margin, more than offsetting the Democrat and independent support.

    Sen. David Parks, the sponsor of the bill, said the results do not conform with other polls he has seen, particularly one by Newsweek magazine.

    In December, Newsweek reported its national poll found 55 percent of Americans favor legally sanctioned civil union, or domestic partnerships, while 36 percent oppose them.

    Parks, D-Las Vegas, said the Review-Journal pollsters might have found more negative voters because they did not poll younger voters who have only cell phones. These voters cannot be reached by pollsters using telephone directories, he said.

    But Brad Coker, the managing partner of Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., insisted his staff took steps to ensure the results contained a proper number of younger voters.

    "I don't think that is the issue," Coker said about Parks' analysis. "I just think it is the number of Republicans rejecting it."

    Mason-Dixon, which conducted the survey, interviewed 625 registered voters by telephone on May 12 through Thursday.

    Steps were taken to ensure the numbers of Democrats, Republicans and independents interviewed reflect their percentage breakdown of registered voters.

    The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    Poll or no poll, the bill to let couples go to the secretary of state's office, pay a fee and get a domestic partnership contract is headed to Gov. Jim Gibbons by the end of the week.

    The Senate only has to agree to minor amendment to the bill, which has passed both houses, before Gibbons receives it.

    Under the bill, couples with domestic partnership contracts legally would be entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as heterosexual married couples.

    Gibbons said he will veto the bill because same-sex couples already can secure inheritance, hospital visitation and other rights that married couples have through private contracts.

    "There are alternative ways of achieving what they want," Gibbons said, mentioning durable powers of attorney as one.

    While some attorneys might try to charge people large fees for these contracts, Gibbons said online forms also are available for little or no cost.

    Assemblyman Ty Cobb, R-Reno, said he opposes SB283 because it is contrary to the wishes of voters who overwhelmingly approved the Protection of Marriage constitutional amendment in 2002.

    While the bill specifies domestic partnerships are not marriages, Cobb said he believes voters who passed the amendment thought they were blocking domestic partnerships and to pass the bill would be contrary to their wishes.

    During a hearing on the bill, Las Vegas resident Richard Ziser, who led the petition drive that ended with the Protection of Marriage amendment, said he might circulate a new petition to prohibit domestic partnerships and civil unions, if SB283 becomes law.

    Parks, for now, needs to pick up a couple of votes in each house to override a veto.

    Contact reporter Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 84 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    atmo wrote on May 21, 2009 03:06 PM: The comments on this page make me sad. So many bigots. So many angry angry people.


    K G B wrote on May 20, 2009 01:09 PM: Washington, D.C.

    You should rejoice in the fact that in America you can choose where and when to spend your hard earned dollars.

    Sorry you have to miss out on what Vegas has to offer, because someone said something you didn't like.


    Rob L. wrote on May 20, 2009 06:43 AM: Karen D Wrote: "Live your lifestyle anyway you want. I just don't want to pay for it."

    Ok. I agree. I am also sick and tired of paying to raise the kids you brought into this world. You lifestyle choice is bankrupting this country and I am tired of paying for it. Idiot!


    Washington, D.C. wrote on May 20, 2009 05:30 AM: My partner of 32 years and I were planning a 4-5 night October Halloween vacation to Las Vegas. Now I know I'll go to Atlantic City, NJ where my $$ are appreciated.

    I am also in the process of planning a convention for Fall 2011 with an expected attendance of approximately 2,500 people. Not huge, but no way will I allow it to be held in Las Vegas as suggested.


    DMCinLV wrote on May 19, 2009 07:32 PM: didn't comment when article originally posted because I felt it was a waste of time.

    now LVRJ.com seems to think this is important, but continue to shuffle articles that are the same?

    "Civil unions" are not only about "gay" marriage. They are about the right for 2 humans to commit to partnership through the end of their life together.

    So, AARP members such as myself can finally "commit" to another without lowering our social security / retirement benefits. He/She can follow through with my final decisions regarding organ donation, last "rites", survivorship rights.

    I hope everyone will wake up to the fact this is not just a "gender" issue but a reality issue for we "baby-boomers".


    Chicano wrote on May 19, 2009 07:08 PM: I don't have a problem with gay marriage as long as it's between a man and a woman. No corn holes!


    Dune wrote on May 19, 2009 07:07 PM: "Please cite as many credible references as possible referring to gay as a disorder."

    The objective of life is survive and reproduce. Homosexuals lack the primal drive to do this. Someone gave birth to you, that's my credible reference.

    "That makes contraception a disorder, and the Catholic church has been arguing that for decades. Of course we know there are no gays in the Catholic church. Oh, wait."

    Contraception is a man-made invention. It has nothing nature. Anti-religious, arguments are also flawed.


    THE JOKER wrote on May 19, 2009 06:32 PM: WHO KNEW FRED WAS GAY, GOOD FOR YOU FREDDY!


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on May 19, 2009 06:25 PM: "It absolutely fine to be gay, but don't lie to yourself, it is a disorder."

    Please cite as many credible references as possible referring to gay as a disorder.

    "Nature intended for a male to have sex with and procreate with a female. An deviation from this is abnormal behavior."

    That makes contraception a disorder, and the Catholic church has been arguing that for decades. Of course we know there are no gays in the Catholic church. Oh, wait.


    THE JOKER wrote on May 19, 2009 06:20 PM: CORNHOLE!


    Read All Comments