Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Governor rejects four bills

Assembly overrides all but one of his vetoes

CARSON CITY -- As promised, Gov. Jim Gibbons on Thursday vetoed a measure that would authorize the Washoe County Commission to enact a voter-approved gasoline tax increase to raise money to finance transportation projects.

Senate Bill 201 was among four measures rejected by the Republican governor.


Most Popular Stories
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • Others dealt with fees levied by the state's water engineer, penalties for taking free periodicals and expanding a consumer health assistance program that Gibbons wanted to eliminate. Those bills were overridden late Thursday by the Assembly.

    The governor said he was vetoing SB201 because the advisory question approved by Reno-area voters lacked "a clear and concise statement that the state legislation being sought would come in the form of a fuel tax increase."

    "There is no reason a concept as simple as a tax increase cannot be clearly stated in the call of the question," Gibbons said. "I support the will of the people but I cannot support bills premised on advisory questions worded in a manner that deliberately obscures the impact of the question from the voters."

    Reno Mayor Bob Cashell has said Gibbons lied to him and Sparks Mayor Geno Martini about the measure when he said he would support anything passed by voters. But Cashell acknowledged Gibbons' comments weren't specific to SB201, rather that he would generally support a voter-approved tax increase.

    Gibbons also vetoed Assembly Bill 480, which would have increased fees collected by the state's water engineer, saying he wasn't aware of "any significant support by industry" for the fees. He added that higher fees during tough economic times "just does not make economic sense."

    Also rejected by the governor was Assembly Bill 257, which would have made it a crime for someone to take more than 10 copies of a free publication. The governor said police have more important things to do.

    The governor also vetoed Assembly Bill 122, which would have expanded authority of the state Office for Consumer Health Assistance. Gibbons said he had proposed eliminating the office because it duplicates other government services.

    Also, Gibbons said, the office "is not an essential governmental service that the state of Nevada can afford to fund in these tough economic times."

    Review-Journal Capital Bureau reporter Ed Vogel contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 19 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on May 22, 2009 07:43 PM: Operating from the a-priori assumption that Gibbons is a sociopath (most evidence supports this) we have to ask ourselves: "what is he up to?"

    His political career is past the raging bonfire stage; only the embers still smolder.

    As an a-priori Republicon sociopath he's only interested in one thing: Jim Gibbons. He's absolutely INCAPABLE of caring about anyone else. Republicon, Sociopath, Las Vegas Republicon-Journal boy, is absolutely INCAPABLE of caring about anyone else. INCAPABELE.

    The worst governor in America. We just got rid of the worst president in America, but Cheney keeps rearing his war-criminal head.

    After Carson City, Gim Jibbons will likely find himself as some sort of a strip-club lobbyist / representative, associating with those of his character, the serial-killers like ginned-up Oscar Goodman used to make a living defending, before he he was able to capitalize on his infamous notariety by plugging a certain alcohol label. His mother is proud.

    When the NHP arrests somebody with the new, insatiable MADD lower alcohol limits, in a town that was built on alcohol and no closing time, when they hear you're loaded on Bombay Sapphire they automatically let you go.

    What kind of alcohol was he on?

    Anyway, Gim Jibbons is a sociopath Republicon. Treat him like one.


    Report abuse

    John wrote on May 22, 2009 03:42 PM: I would have vetoed them too but Gibbons is still the lowest form of lying cheating scum and I can't wait til he looses the next election.. If only for what he did to his lovely wife.


    Report abuse

    George wrote on May 22, 2009 01:57 PM: I'm not a big Gibbons fan either...
    However, he is making a little more sense than usual.


    Report abuse

    S. Summerlin wrote on May 22, 2009 11:38 AM: Wow... I guess all this doesn't matter since the Assembly over-turned the vetoes...

    Here comes the tax, here comes the tax...


    Report abuse

    S. Summerlin wrote on May 22, 2009 11:37 AM: LB --- What about the children? We should be taxed so that the children don't suffer...

    I am with you on a few things tho... lets not cut fire, police, education... but what about some of these wonderful battered spouse programs... or indigent care programs... or illegal alien education programs...

    Money doesn't come out of thin air, and our politicians are spending it on pet programs while holding the core services you mention hostage to get even more money...

    Don't you ever wonder why we are presented with the choice of cut education or raise taxes, rather than cut Paco-Ed, or Domestic Violence Outreach or raise taxes...

    Here's a hint... BECAUSE THOSE ARE ESSENTIAL SERVICES AND WILL NOT INSPIRE PEOPLE TO AGREE TO PAY MORE...

    I am not a big Gibbons fan, but I do give him fair credibility for these veteos on these 4 bills.


    Report abuse

    GD wrote on May 22, 2009 11:34 AM: Good job Governor Gibbons. It seems like you are the only one that understands you can't spend money that is not there.

    Democrats just love spending-spending-spending (with no accountability).

    Past time for this state to live within it's means.


    Report abuse

    M wrote on May 22, 2009 11:12 AM: I support all the vetoes. Who is the moron who wasted double our taxpayer dollars making it a crime to take more than 10 publications. One in wasting legislative time; two, in wasting police officers' time to prosecute.


    Report abuse

    Helen Weils wrote on May 22, 2009 10:07 AM: ALL OF THESE BILLS SHOULD BE VETOED.

    GO JIM GIBBONS!


    Report abuse

    Helen Weils wrote on May 22, 2009 10:06 AM: ALL OF THESE BILLS SHOULD BE VETOED.
    GO JIM GIBBONS!


    Report abuse

    Helen Weils wrote on May 22, 2009 10:05 AM: LET THE LAYOFFS BEGIN!!!!!


    Read All Comments