Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Legislature approves bill cutting benefits to public employees

CARSON CITY -- A bill that saves the state millions of dollars by cutting public employee retirement and health care benefits won approval Thursday night on votes of 19-2 in the Senate and 41-0 in the Assembly.

Both houses moved quickly to pass amended Senate Bill 427. Republican leaders insisted it pass before any members of their party vote to override Gov. Jim Gibbons' vetoes of bills increasing taxes by $781 million, which were issued earlier Thursday.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • During hearings on SB427, both Republican and Democrats said benefit reductions were necessary to guarantee the continued solvency of the Public Employees Retirement System and the Public Employees Benefits Program.

    The spending reforms will not affect benefits to existing public employees, only those hired after Jan. 1.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons is expected to sign the bill, which contains reforms similar to those advocated by his Spending and Government Efficiency Commission.

    While backing the bill, Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford, D-Las Vegas, expressed concern that the benefit reductions will cause younger people to avoid choosing careers in public service.

    "The processes in this bill are a major shift for new employees going forward," Horsford said.

    But Sen. Warren Hardy, R-Las Vegas, said the reductions are necessary to ensure the solvency of the programs.

    "We are helping to ensure these program will be here for a long time," added Hardy.

    Dana Bilyeu, the Public Employees Retirement System executive officer, said she has no figures on the savings her agency will receive from the change.

    The bill varies only slightly from one discussed last week in a Senate committee.

    Bilyeu estimated then that the bill would save PERS about $142 million a year in coming years.

    The biggest changes to the retirement system affects police officers and firefighters. Under the terms of the reform, they would have to work 30 years, the same as other public employees, before they could retire at any age and receive full benefits. Under the current law, they could retire at any age and receive full benefits after working 25 years.

    Future public employees who retire early also will be docked 6 percent of their retirement pay for each year they retire early. Current employees are cut only 4 percent a year.

    The reform plan reduces health care and retirement benefits for future public employees. It also requires local governments to approve or reject any collective bargaining agreements during public meetings.

    The chief executive officer of the local government also must report on the fiscal impact of the agreements.

    Senate Minority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, insisted on the reforms to collective bargaining, PERS and health care benefits before his party would vote to override Gibbons' vetoes.

    Last week he also demanded that no public employee should receive any retirement benefits before age 62, the same as in private industry. But that demand was not found in the passed reform bill.

    Raggio called the reforms in SB427 "a good step forward" that won't penalize existing employees.

    Without the benefit changes, he said, the state of Nevada and its PERS system would be in the same position as the federal government is with Social Security: facing insolvency.

    Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, voted against the bill. He said he was concerned that the higher education system of Nevada won't be able to hire star professors because of changes in health care benefits.

    Under the reforms, professors and all state employees and teachers would have to work a minimum of 15 years with the state to acquire a monthly subsidy when they retire. That subsidy, from $396 a month to $696 a month, can be used by retirees to purchase health care insurance.

    Previously, the law allowed partial subsidies when employees work as little as five years, a feature that Coffin said universities used to attract quality professors.

    Sen. Maggie Carlton, D-Las Vegas, also voted against the bill.

    "I was brought up to raise up the next generation," said Carlton, explaining she did not want to cut benefits to future employees.

    Hardy said Nevada is the only state in the union to offer any subsides to help retirees buy health care polices.

    Even with the changes, he said, Nevada still offers the most generous retirement package in the nation.

    "I feel what we did was in the best interest of the state of Nevada," Hardy added.

    Coffin still refused to support the bill.

    "We have cut everybody's pay," he said. "We have cut everybody's benefits. There is nothing to be proud of."

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    NEVADA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEM REFORM

    Current public employee retirement law

    Police and firefighters receive full retirement pay and could retire at any age after working 25 years. Regular employees hired after 2001 could retire with full benefits after working 28 years.

    Regular employees who work 20 years couldn't retire and receive 50 percent of full benefits before age 55.

    Police and firefighters who work 20 years couldn't retire and receive 50 percent of full benefits before age 50.

    Regular employees who work 10 years couldn't retire and receive 25 percent of full benefits before age 60.

    Police or firefighters who work 10 years couldn't retire and receive 25 percent of full benefits before age 55.

    Their retirement pay is cut 4 percent for each year they retire early.

    The health care benefit deductible paid by an individual is $500.

    The health care benefit deductible paid by a family is $1,000.

    A partial retirement subsidy is available to state employees after they worked five years.

    Changes approved by lawmakers for workers hired after Jan. 1, 2010

    All employees can retire at any age after working 30 years on the job and receive full retirement benefits.

    Regular employees who work 20 years can't retire and receive 50 percent of full benefits before age 60.

    Police and firefighters who work 20 years can't retire and receive 50 percent of full benefits before age 50.

    Regular employees can't retire after working 10 years and receive 25 percent of full benefits before age 62.

    Police and firefighters can't retire after working 10 years and receive 25 percent of full benefits before age 60.

    Their retirement pay is cut 6 percent for each year they retire early.

    The health care benefit deductible paid by an individual is $725.

    The health care benefit deductible paid by a family is $1,450.

    To acquire a retirement subsidy, employees hired after Jan. 1 will have to work as long as 15 years for the state.

    Premiums paid by the state for health care programs for employees would be reduced by 5 percent.

    SOURCE: 2009 Nevada State Senate
    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 18 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Ron wrote on June 02, 2009 10:38 AM: As usual lvrj gets their facts wrong. "Regular employees who work 20 years couldn't retire and receive 50 percent of full benefits before age 55". There is no retirement eligibility for regular employee's after 20 years to retire at age 55. They need to check the PERS web site or talk to someone at the office and verify the facts.


    Report abuse

    Legislators Suck... wrote on May 29, 2009 06:08 PM: I am sick of these legislators cutting back door deals that hurt peoples lives... I don't see these idiots doing things that hurt their wallets and dismantle their lives. All of these morons should be voted out and they should be replaced by true lay-persons. STATESMEN.


    Report abuse

    Americans have truly lost touch wrote on May 29, 2009 06:05 PM: What is wrong with all these anti-government employee people. Government employees provide tremendous services to the citizens of our communities. Cutting their pay or slashing their benefits harms them just like it harms any other AMERICAN citizen. We, as Americans, need to form a little better bond with our fellow Americans and support one another... Salary and benefit reductions hurt everyone.


    Report abuse

    Janet wrote on May 29, 2009 04:36 PM: All of you crybabies have the opportunity to work for the state, county, city and federal government. Yet all you do is complain about the benefits they have, and talk of lazy workers who do nothing. You don't think it's going to be tough on state government employees to get a pay cut, furlough days, or lose health benefits? Geez...get real. Yes, people are being laid off in the private sector. Well, the same is happening to state employees in addition to the above mentioned cuts in pay. So quit crying. And if you think we have it so good, come and apply for a job!!! If you can handle the workload.


    Report abuse

    Joe Bama wrote on May 29, 2009 12:22 PM: Good we have too many people trying to get "public service" jobs already. It can't be that bad of a deal.(and yes it was like that when the economy was good also)


    Report abuse

    SamT wrote on May 29, 2009 10:07 AM: @voteDEM: Well said!

    Regarding union employees and your vaunted unions, mark this day on your calendar: you're on the slippery slope to oblivion, starting today.


    Report abuse

    voteDEM. wrote on May 29, 2009 09:03 AM: Got what you asked for.
    You voted for these Dems. both on the local and national level and now you'll reap the benefits.
    Wait till Hussein raises your electricity to the new M.I.T. quoted level of 90% increase to give you green. Maybe you'll be able to sell your trucks for a Obama bubble car.
    When they raise the prices here high enough maybe you'll get the illegals out of here so there will be more jobs for U.S. citizens. Better do it before the Amnesty.
    All you union lackeys now see how well you're really protected. You should have gone to lesser work week and you'd have a job.
    Give a big job well done to the turkeys the majority of you voted for, or should I say who the union told you to vote for?
    Stick around and maybe you'll find the dog food at the 99c store to your likening.


    Report abuse

    BSE wrote on May 29, 2009 07:57 AM: Let's make everyone, in every profession (public or private) work until they are 62 years of age before they can collect a pension. That way if you hire on at 18, you only have to work 44 years in that profession. Sounds good, huh? A lot of public employees start working for the public at 18. If a private company employee wants to work 44 years in that job, I will too!


    Report abuse

    Gregory Brown wrote on May 29, 2009 07:32 AM: Senator Hardy is incorrect when he states Nevada is the only state to subsidize its workers health insurance in retirement. According to the National Center for Excellence in State and Local Government (a business-funded group), 45 of 50 states provide this benefit -- and 19 (not including Nevada) pay the entire premium for their retirees. A chart showing these states may be viewed here
    http://tinyurl.c4x78t.


    Report abuse

    Jimbo the Shaky Hands Text Lover wrote on May 29, 2009 07:17 AM: Let's shut down the government except for all the money I spend on nice signs and red veto stamps. Lets cut benefits more for state workers so that all the good ones leave and we are left only with the lazy ones who can't find jobs elsewhere! Love, Jimbo the TWITTER TEXT MAN.


    Read All Comments