Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Ballot question bill OK'd

CARSON CITY -- A bill changing rules for qualifying questions for the ballot won state Senate approval Sunday despite arguments by a lawmaker who said it was improved but still could interfere with Nevadans' constitutional rights.

State Senate Judiciary Chairman Terry Care, D-Las Vegas, who cast the lone "no" vote against SB212, said it's favored by interest groups fearful of the initiative. He added that even with revisions, its vague wording could lead to more obstacles for citizens trying to petition for change.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Suspect in officer slaying leaves hospital, enters jail
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • The measure was changed Saturday by Senate Finance Committee members to require petitioners seeking a spot on the ballot to get a minimum number of signatures in each of Nevada's congressional districts.

    That standard has passed constitutional muster in recent court rulings because such districts tend to have roughly equal numbers of voters.

    But Care, echoing comments Saturday by Lee Rowland of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, said questions remain because provisions of the bill would expire in mid-2011 and an "undefined notion of a petition district" would remain.

    State Sen. Bob Coffin, D-Las Vegas, backed SB212, saying wealthy individuals trying to "drive their own agenda" have used petitions to undermine the legislative process.

    The original wording of SB212 called for petition-circulators to get signatures amounting to at least 10 percent of the voters who cast ballots in each of Nevada's 42 Assembly districts in the preceding election, a plan that was challenged on constitutional grounds.

    Lawmakers discussed using Nevada's higher education system regent districts for the ballot question rules, but the ACLU noted widely varying numbers of voters in both the Assembly and regent districts and said such disparities would prompt court challenges.

    The latest efforts by lawmakers follow a U.S. District Court judge's ruling last year that rejected Nevada's initiative petition requirements seeking to compensate for different population sizes in urban and rural counties.

    The ruling struck down rules approved by the 2007 Legislature that forced petition-gatherers to get signatures from 10 percent of the voters in each county rather than 10 percent statewide.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    John wrote on June 01, 2009 09:17 PM: What if the people of nevada vote for something either some special interest group or some representative on the take is either going to court to change it or pass some law to change it.


    What's The Diff ? wrote on June 01, 2009 05:15 PM: What's the difference how we feel or vote? As you can plainly see, our supposed lawmakers do what and how they wish ( contrary to our wishes and votes on numerous isses ).I have a vote coming up on their election, and they won't like that either,but they can't ignore that vote. Vote out all of these self serving bums.


    HA wrote on June 01, 2009 01:24 PM: Could interfere with Nevadans' constitutional rights? What rights?
    Since when does the citizens have anything to say in Clark County NEVADA???

    Clark County leaders and their cop flunkies have been destroying US Constitutional Rights for YEARS and YEARS. Yet no one had lifted a finger to stop it. YOUR Rights. Your say in the matter and alot has to do with the State Senate taking away your rights and freedoms. Look them up, then wake up and do something.