Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


SEX SCANDAL: Ensign's approval rating drops

But he's still Nevada's most popular senior elected official
















Since admitting an extramarital affair with a former staffer, Sen. John Ensign's approval rating in his home state has plunged.

In a new Las Vegas Review-Journal poll of Nevada voters, 39 percent had a favorable view of Ensign, a drop of 14 percentage points from a month ago.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • The percentage who regarded Ensign unfavorably, 37 percent, was up 19 points from a month ago, when just 18 percent viewed him negatively.

    Yet most Nevada voters -- 62 percent -- do not think Ensign should resign from the Senate over his admission last week that he carried on a nine-month affair with a married campaign staffer.

    Nearly half say their opinion of the Republican senator is unchanged by the news.

    In fact, Ensign remains relatively well regarded in a state whose other two top statewide officials, Gov. Jim Gibbons and Sen. Harry Reid, were already quite unpopular.

    The poll of 625 Nevadans who vote regularly, conducted Thursday and Friday by Mason-Dixon Polling & Research Inc. of Washington, D.C., represents the first snapshot of voters' reactions to the Ensign scandal. It carries a margin of error of plus or minus four percentage points.

    The new poll contrasts with a similar survey conducted May 12-14 in which Ensign's favorable rating was 53 percent.

    Ensign, 51, announced the affair in a news conference Tuesday, saying he has reconciled with his wife since the dalliance with 46-year-old Cindy Hampton, which began in December 2007, ended last August. Ensign said he plans to remain in office.

    Until May 2008, Cindy Hampton worked for Ensign's campaign committees, while her husband, Doug, was a top staffer in Ensign's Senate office. Both were longtime close friends of the Ensigns.

    Mason-Dixon Managing Partner Brad Coker said Ensign can be grateful that he doesn't have to face voters again until 2012. Provided there are not significant further revelations, voters' anger over this type of scandal is likely to fade over time.

    "His numbers have obviously dropped. He's obviously suffered damage because of this," Coker said. "But it could be a lot worse for Ensign. The really significant question is that only 29 percent think he should resign right away. He does have the ability to stay on and turn this around."

    The question about his potential resignation was framed in the context of former Sen. Larry Craig. Ensign called on Craig to resign after the Idaho Republican was arrested on charges he sought sex in an airport men's room.

    In light of that situation, 62 percent of Nevadans said Ensign should not resign "because of his admitted affair," while 29 percent said he should.

    Republicans (17 percent) and men (25 percent) were least likely to want Ensign to step down, while Democrats (40 percent) and women (33 percent) were more likely to call for his resignation.

    Poll respondents appeared troubled by the fact that Cindy Hampton got a significant pay raise during the affair.

    Her combined pay from Ensign's campaign fund and his political action committee -- all money from campaign contributions, not tax dollars -- doubled from about $2,000 per month to about $4,000 per month while the affair was going on.

    About a third of those polled considered that a very serious concern, while another third called it somewhat serious, for a total of two-thirds viewing the salary increases as a serious matter. Just 28 percent said it was not too serious or not at all serious.

    "Time is going to be his greatest ally with this," Coker said. "As long as there's nothing more to it and he goes back to Washington and does his job, he could come back. He wouldn't be the first politician to have an affair who didn't get booted out of office for it."

    Coker drew a parallel with Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who in 2007 admitted having been a client of a prostitution service run by the so-called "D.C. Madam."

    Vitter stayed put despite the firestorm over that scandal and now is favored for re-election in 2010.

    "His (Ensign's) standing has been dropped, and any thoughts of the presidency are definitely out the window," Coker said. "He's paid a price politically, and in the short term he will continue to pay a price. But we'll see what three years brings. If Vitter could bounce back in a much more socially conservative state than Nevada, Ensign has at least a 50-50 shot at it."

    Larry Sabato, head of the Institute for Politics at the University of Virginia, said Ensign is helped by the fact that he was very popular in his home state before the scandal.

    With sex scandals involving politicians becoming commonplace in recent years, voters are increasingly willing to forgive, especially if the scandal is a matter of simple infidelity and the politician involved confesses quickly and fully.

    "We are in a new era," Sabato said. "What would have killed the king 20 years ago is a flesh wound today."

    But he cautioned that the Ensign story clearly is not over, with new details of Ensign's relationship and dealings with the Hamptons continuing to dribble out and many questions remaining unanswered. Ensign's office has acknowledged the senator helped Doug Hampton find employment upon his departure from the Senate staff.

    On Friday, an Ensign spokesman said Doug Hampton, through an attorney, had made an "outrageous demand" for a large amount of money in the past month, with the implication that it would buy the couple's silence.

    Through their Las Vegas attorney, the Hamptons have blamed Ensign for choosing to go public with the affair, but a letter has since surfaced in which Doug Hampton described the situation to the Fox News cable network and pleaded with anchor Megyn Kelly to expose the affair.

    "Today, people are basically saying, 'He had an affair. We've been through this before. We generally give politicians a second chance,'" Sabato said. "But people are going to learn a lot more unpleasant things about Senator Ensign. That much is already obvious. People don't know just how messy the truth is and how nasty it's going to get. This is not going to be a simple controversy where you have a press conference, the wife stands loyally by you, and then it's over."

    At 39 percent, Ensign's diminished favorable rating is slightly higher than that of the state's senior senator, Majority Leader Harry Reid (34 percent), and far above that of the dismally unpopular Gov. Jim Gibbons (10 percent).

    "That sure says something, that the guy involved in the adultery scandal is the most popular senior elected official in the state," Sabato said. "I don't know what it says, but it says something."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball @reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 138 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Claudia H wrote on June 27, 2009 02:57 PM: If the man can't maintain honor and order in his family life, how can he be trusted to do so as a public person? He took vows and commited to his wife/family. He took vows and commited to public office. Are we seeing his limitations?
    How can you possibly trust a commitment phobic liar?
    I'd have more trust in a monkey.


    Report abuse

    Pay to play wit me wrote on June 24, 2009 04:04 AM: Young was young below waist

    Gillespie needs a bag or rag over face
    Gibbons no hope but to rape

    Ensign has been hotty


    Report abuse

    Johnathan L. Abbinett wrote on June 23, 2009 05:48 PM: This is NOT just another everyday, garden-variety, adulterous affair people - Ensign committed the crime of sexual harrassment as an employer with one of his employees (the other woman's husband also worked for Ensign) - this issue is about women being free from being preyed upon in the workplace by predatory employers!

    Of course, Ensign (and his staff and supporters) want to spin it like it's just another "affair" and much ado about nothing - so the story dies and people forget what happened - and Ensign gets away with his crime and gets re-elected?

    That's how people in power commit crimes and get away with and stay in power!

    This issue is about women being treated with full equal opportunity, due dignity and respect and upholding the laws that protect all people!

    I personally do not care what consenting adults do after working hours in the privacy of their lives - just as long as no laws are being broken, no one ends up beaten, bruised or bleeding - consenting adults may do as they please...but, there are laws to protect employees from employers who are predators!

    Ensign, by his own admission that he was the superior/employer and the other woman was the subordinate/employee, committed the crime of SEXUAL HARRASSMENT - that's an established and undisputed fact!

    Ensign, again by his own admission, states that the "affair" went on for several months, even after Ensign confessed to his wife, Ensign continued to pursue the other woman...

    ...and even after the other woman (and her husband who was also employed by Ensign) left the employ of Ensign, the time-line clearly indicates that Ensign continued to pursue the other woman - these FACTS raise the specific question:

    "Is U. S. Senator, John Ensign, (Republican-NV) who's obviously GUILTY of SEXUAL HARRASSMENT, also GUILTY of STALKING and being A SEXUAL PREDATOR!"


    Report abuse

    Att. B on da look out wrote on June 22, 2009 12:13 PM: Please b advise we have a crime spert invlving several wma,s apprx 55 years old wrinkled small to really small wee-wees big ego,s small iq,
    Hairy from waist down , dizzy, g.e.d.

    Bring it own billy young
    Dizzy liar Nazi Gillespie
    Village idiot veto gibbons
    I love them old broads ensign

    Capt c dub , ged


    Report abuse

    Johnathan L. Abbinett wrote on June 22, 2009 11:26 AM: What continues to bother me the most is the crime of SEXUAL HARRASSMENT, and that the facts indicate that Ensign continued to pursue this woman - that is STALKING, which leads to the big question:

    "Is U. S. Senator, JOHN ENSIGN, (REPUBLICAN-NV), also GUILTY of STALKING and being a SEXUAL PREDATOR?"


    Report abuse

    AG wrote on June 22, 2009 08:08 AM: Nevada voters, you ought to know that this is the same man who inserted an amendment into the D.C. voting rights bill that would completely prevent D.C. from regulating guns or even requiring registration of guns. That is less restrictive than most states in this country! His amendment has now destroyed any chance that we will get a vote in Congress in the near future. So thank you to John Ensign for your posion-pill amendment, regarding a jurisdiction that is not even yours. Nevada voters, please vote him out the first chance you get!


    Report abuse

    Mister Twister wrote on June 22, 2009 01:09 AM: After years of watching situations like Ted Kennedy and Chappaquiddick, Barney Frank's gay prostitution ring out of his house, Bill and Monica, Mark Foley and his pages, and toe tapping Larry Craig in the airport john, when the Ensign scandal broke, it all seemed so tame. I thought he was going to tell us he ripped off General Motors or AIG for a billion or two, or embezzled the GOP Senate reelection coffers and that's why they lost, or even that a bridge was being built to some land he owned!
    No, just a fling with the office help.
    Had it been at a legal brothel in the cow counties would that have been okay, just supporting the local economy?

    Seriously, the man and his family have some serious private issues to deal with, but after seeing what's come down the pike from Washington over the years, and after our little G-Sting scandal a few years back, I'm a little indifferent to sex scandals these days, especially one as vanilla as this, that you'd see on the afternoon soaps every day. I wish that what happened in Vegas had stayed in Vegas--behind closed doors, and we can focus on the economy and North Korea shooting a missile at a state. I give the senator a vote of confidence--he's the senator from Las Vegas after all, and what do we subtly promote with our gaming? Besides, instead of paying off the people, hushing this thing up, and going on his merry way to higher office, he laid it all on the line. I'd rather have that than a new airport around some select land in Jean.


    Report abuse

    ET wrote on June 21, 2009 11:26 PM: The Republicans are fools like Ensign,it's why we voted em out .They are mad because of Pres.Obamas response to Irans dictator,however,the President is displaying intelligence by watching,hard for the Republicans to understand(strawman),it's one reason we voted em out.


    Report abuse

    John ` wrote on June 21, 2009 11:16 PM: Typical pervert him and Gibbons. You are an embarrassment to our party. Just go away.


    Report abuse

    ENSIGN HARD AT WORK: THAT'S WHERE THE PROBLEMS START!! wrote on June 21, 2009 10:13 PM: John Ensign is hard at work for Nevada. That's the problem isn't it, being hard at work? What kind of nutball hits on his own employees, all the while telling the rest of the world about how sacred the bonds of marriage are?

    IF JOHN ENSIGN HAD A SINGLE SHRED OF CHARACTER, HE WOULD IMMEDIATELY RESIGN FROM OFFICE AND SAVE HIS FAMILY, HIS STATE, AND THE REST OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY THE EMBARRASSMENT OF THIS ONGOING SCANDAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Read All Comments