Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


SAGE COMMISSION: Lawmakers take steps to change retirement, health care benefits

Cuts in public workers' benefits a high priority

CARSON CITY -- For members of the Spending and Government Efficiency Commission, the 2009 Legislature was a mixed bag.

About half of its 23 recommendations became law or were adopted by the Gibbons' administration in one form or another, while the rest were rejected by the governor or ignored by the Legislature.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields




  • Still, Sage Commission Chairman Bruce James said the commission achieved success beyond his expectations because the Legislature for the first time cut expenditures of the Public Employees Retirement System and the Public Employees Benefits Program.

    Cutting the expenditures of those two agencies had been the commission's top recommendation.

    While the Legislature did not agree precisely with the changes proposed by the Sage Commission, it did make reforms that prospectively will save the state hundreds of millions of dollars.

    At one point during the Legislature, Dana Bilyeu, PERS chief executive officer, said the reforms would save $140 million a year.

    "These changes were long overdue," said James, the former U.S. printer and a self-made millionaire from Lake Tahoe. "We are going in the right direction. I am pleased by what happened in the Legislature."

    James noted that the commission had no power to draw up bills, and its members did not lobby the Legislature, testifying only when requested by Gov. Jim Gibbons.

    Mendy Elliott, Gibbons' deputy chief of staff, figured there was nothing shabby about having half of the recommendations adopted.

    The SAGE Commission will continue meeting monthly and make recommendations to consider during the Legislature in 2011 or, if possible, to implement sooner by the administration, Elliott said.

    "The SAGE Commission worked well together," Elliott said. "The governor was very pleased by the PERS and PEBP reform. Did it go as far as the governor and the SAGE Commission wanted? No, but that did something."

    Although the commission's 14 members were named by Gibbons, half were recommended by legislative leaders. Seven are Democrats, and seven are Republicans.

    Members include former Las Vegas Mayor Jan Jones, former Assemblyman David Goldwater, former state Budget Director Perry Comeaux, Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce President Steve Hill and ex-Tax Commissioner Barbara Smith Campbell.

    The members unanimously backed all of the commission's recommendations except health care spending reform.

    With PERS and PEBP facing a long-term funding shortfall of more than $10 billion, SAGE Commission member Carole Vilardo said changes had to be made.

    "They have been receiving perpetual increases to the point that the level of contributions made by the state was taking away from other programs and services," said Vilardo, who is president of the Nevada Taxpayers Association.

    Assembly Minority Leader Heidi Gansert, R-Reno, doubted the Legislature would have made the reforms it did without the commission's recommendations.

    "I absolutely thought what they did was worthwhile," Gansert said. "They had creative ideas. I hope they continue to come up with those ideas."

    James said his biggest disappointment was the Legislature's rejection of the recommendation to close the 140-year-old Nevada State Prison in Carson City.

    Closing the prison would have saved $19 million a year, according to the commission.

    But Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, said the closure would have forced the state to spend $220 million on a new prison.

    James disputed that contention, saying prisoners and staff could have been transferred to other prisons.

    A new prison won't be needed until the inmate population grows, James said.

    "There would have been an immediate savings to the state. They didn't have the political will to close the prison. It was their decision."

    Gibbons wanted the prison closed, and not just for the cost savings, Elliott said.

    Corrections Director Howard Skolnik considered the old prison unsafe, she said.

    Elliott also acknowledged that Gibbons rejected a couple of the commission's recommendations, such as adopting a four-day work week for non-critical state employees.

    The Gibbons administration contacted officials in Utah, where state government switched to a four-day week, and found that the savings were not that great, Elliott said.

    Gibbons also reasoned that residents rely on state government being open on weekdays.

    For now, the governor has also rejected a recommendation that fees for state services should cover the costs of providing those services.

    Elliott said Gibbons still could adopt that recommendation after his administration reviews all state fees to determine whether they are too high or too low.

    "We will be looking at this," Elliott said.

    Contact reporter Ed Vogel at evogel @reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 10 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Interest Reader wrote on June 22, 2009 03:21 PM: In response to the Mike26.

    I suspect that it is because that it perhaps all that the average Las Vegan can absorb. Based on the comments made by some contributors, it is approximately a sentence or two too much.


    Report abuse

    Mike26 wrote on June 22, 2009 02:49 PM: Why is every paragraph in this article only a sentence or two long?


    Report abuse

    Interested Reader wrote on June 22, 2009 02:26 PM: The SAGE Commission has operated on assumptions drawn from flawed data from the very outset.

    But here in Las Vegas why would anyone allow accurate information get in the way of their very public opinions?

    The SAGE Commission represents a classice example of an outcome desperately searching for a justification.

    Consider this possible scenario. If I was a wealthy business owner or senior executive in a company, would it benefit me personally to erode benefits of a large body of people who the public may believe enjoy benefits considerably better than they actually are? I wonder if in doing so, my employees might then stop demanding improved benefits and become "grateful" for any that they may have, and become fearful of losing them?




    Report abuse

    RonNV wrote on June 22, 2009 11:13 AM: I agree with Randy. There is nothing wrong with getting a few CPAs and let them audit the books carefully. Nevada has some of the best accountants anywhere and a financial audit would uncover a lot of waste. The last thing we need are some over priced researchers conducting some worthless study.


    Report abuse

    county paramedic union local 1908 offers huge retirement and health packages for felons.. wrote on June 22, 2009 10:09 AM:
    felons get paid for 10 years to sit at home and wait ti qualify for a pension too,then the district attorney drops the charges and you give you a clean record.




    http://www.lasvegasnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=7160466&nav=menu102_2_3

































    you are being scammed las vegas


    Report abuse

    HELEN WEILS....THAT IS MY NAME AND IF I WANT TO HAVE CAPS ON, THEN I WILL wrote on June 22, 2009 10:04 AM: SO LEAVE ME ALONE

    AND STOP TRYING TO BE ME

    GO JIM, I LOVE YOU AND I CAN'T WAIT TIL YOU COME BACK TO VEGAS SO WE CAN BE TOGETHER

    GIBBIONS IN 2012


    Report abuse

    RANDY wrote on June 22, 2009 09:26 AM: IT'S SEEMS THERE MUST BE SOME ACCOUNTING MAGIC GOING ON IN GOVERNMENT. LOTS OF MONEY GOES IN AND IT DISAPPEARS. I WOULD LIKE AN INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING FIRM TO LOOK AT WHERE ALL THE MONEY GOES. IF THE TAX MONEY WAS PROPERLY MANAGED, WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO RAISE TAXES. WE WOULDN'T HAVE A SHORT-FALL. WE SHOULD HAVE SOME ACCOUNTABILITY PUT IN PLACE OR A LAW. OUR LEGISLATORS WILL SIMPLY VOTE TO RAISE TAXES AND NOT EVEN CONSIDER WHERE OR HOW THE MONEY IS SPENT. WHEN TIMES ARE GOOD, WE CAN SPEND TAX MONEY ON EXTRA PROGRAMS. IN A RES SESSION, YOU GOT TO SCALE BACK. CUT WHERE NECESSARY. RAISING TAXES IN THIS ECONOMY IS A RECIPE FOR DISASTER. IF YOU WANT TO SEE OUR FUTURE, JUST LOOK AT CALIFORNIA'S PREDICAMENT. WE ARE HEADED IN THE SAME DIRECTION.


    Report abuse

    Big Bill wrote on June 22, 2009 08:58 AM: Helen:

    It isn't your money. Let the taxpayers spend it. And turn off the CAPS LOCK.

    In regards to story/benefits: They are just that. BENEFITS.

    Why should an employer HAVE to offer benefits? Why is health insurance supposed to be a right? Why isn't life insurance a right? Auto insurance?
    Insurance isn't a right.

    From now on, I want my employer to provide my health, life, auto and long-term care insurance.


    Report abuse

    HELEN WEILS wrote on June 22, 2009 07:49 AM: GOVERNOR GIBBONS, HOW COULD YOU LEAVE US IN SUCH HORRIBLE FINANCIAL SHAPE? YOU COULD HAVE WORKED WITH THE LEGISLATURE, BUT INSTEAD YOU PLAYED LIKE A THREE YEAR OLD, TOOK YOUR BALL, AND WENT HOME WHEN YOU COULD NOT GET YOUR WAY. YOU ACTED JUST LIKE ALL THE OTHER REPUBLICANS-GIVING BREAKS TO YOUR BUSINESS FAT CAT FRIENDS WHO CONTRIBUTED TO YOUR CAMPAIGN. RESIGN NOW!


    Report abuse

    HELEN WEILS wrote on June 22, 2009 07:39 AM: GOOD JOB GOVERNOR GIBBONS. AS USUAL THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE UNION SHILLS/
    DUMMYCRATS TRIED TO GIVE MORE TO THEIR
    BUDDIES AS OPPOSED TO WATCHING OUT FOR THE REST OF US TAXPAYERS.
    BUSINESS AS USUAL IN NV.