Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


'WE'RE JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE': Couples celebrate law

Domestic partnership registry to take effect in Nevada







They came to celebrate the passage of Nevada's domestic partnership law, but many simply viewed the event as a celebration of equality.

"Because we're just like everybody else," Cindi Fontenot said.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • Fontenot and her partner of nine years, Adriane Nash, were among the more than 400 people who attended the Thursday night gathering at the Rio to show their support for Senate Bill 283, a law that takes effect Oct. 1.

    "I just think everybody should be treated equal," Fontenot said.

    Fontenot, 60, and Nash, 50, found each other on the Internet in a "lesbian oldies" chat room. Five weeks after meeting face to face, they moved in together.

    Like many other couples at Thursday's event, they took steps to formalize their relationship before a legal avenue became available to them.

    On Thursday, they donned the matching purple tie-dye shirts they wore at their 2007 "wedding" at the Metropolitan Community Church in Las Vegas. They plan to register as domestic partners after the new law goes into effect.

    Under the new law, same-sex and opposite-sex couples can go to the secretary of state's office, sign a registry, pay a fee and secure a domestic partnership contract that essentially gives them the same legal rights and responsibilities as married couples.

    "I think it's about time something like this happened," Fontenot said.

    Domestic partnerships, or civil unions, differ from same-sex marriages, which are now legal in five states. A constitutional amendment approved by Nevada voters in 2002 specifies that a marriage can be only between a man and a woman.

    Ari Castellano, 40, and Imani Ortiz, 30, connected via the Internet and have been together for five months.

    "It was a love-at-first-sight type of thing," Ortiz said.

    The couple had a commitment ceremony in April at Lake Mead, and they moved from Indiana to Henderson a month ago. They had planned to seek a legal marriage, but the passage of Nevada's domestic partnership law means they won't have to leave the state to get the legal recognition they desire.

    "We are going to spend the rest of our lives together, and we do want to have a family together," Castellano said.

    Las Vegas residents Stephan Schuppert, 45, and Dale Loftin, 44, have been a couple for three years and said they, too, plan to register as domestic partners.

    "Basically, we think it's the best way to protect what we built together," Schuppert said.

    John Osuch, 66, and Jerry Hurley, 64, moved to Las Vegas from Connecticut about two years ago. They have been together for nearly 30 years.

    The couple obtained a civil union in Connecticut in 2005 before the state legalized same-sex marriages. Under Connecticut law, their civil union will automatically convert to a marriage in October 2010.

    Hurley said he and Osuch, who were lured to Las Vegas by its weather, wanted to join in the celebration of the state's new law.

    "We were very surprised that it passed," Hurley said. "We never expected Nevada to be one of the earlier states."

    After moving to Nevada, he and Osuch paid a lawyer about $2,000 to secure their rights as a couple. They also plan to register as domestic partners.

    On Thursday, Osuch wondered why same-sex couples shouldn't have the same rights as opposite-sex couples.

    "Are we lesser people than others?" he asked.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons vetoed SB283, but the Senate and Assembly both voted to override the veto.

    Several people received recognition Thursday for their support of the bill. Among them were state Sen. David Parks, the bill's sponsor, and Gary Peck, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada.

    "What a historic, landmark moment in the history of our state, a moment that every single Nevadan can and should be proud of," Peck said.

    The event was planned by the ACLU of Nevada, the Gay and Lesbian Community Center of Southern Nevada, the Human Rights Campaign and the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada.

    Contact reporter Carri Geer Thevenot at cgeer@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0264.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 33 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    T wrote on July 30, 2009 08:32 AM: Be careful people! If you start giving civil rights to gay people, then EVERYONE'S going to want them!


    T wrote on July 30, 2009 08:30 AM: Zack...I agree completely, but if it were only that easy. There are TONS of straight married couples who I feel I don't want to support - either because their relationships are abusive, or they neglect their children, or I just don't like them. This gay man will now be accepting applications, and will reduce the taxes I pay according to how many heterosexual couples I donn't want to support with MY taxes.


    Brian wrote on July 05, 2009 12:41 PM: So if the concern is about government benefits and only people who can have children should get those benefits.. Shouldn't you also be mad at straight couples who don't have kids or people who adopt? Are they socialists too?


    No You are not wrote on June 28, 2009 10:10 AM: No. You are not like everyone else. You cannot have children with your lover. You have to go outside your lovers arms to have children. You are not married no matter how much you want to be married. You got this civil union passed so you could steal money from the rest of us just like all the other Socialists.

    This is not about love. It is about government benefits. You know it. I know it. We all know it.

    If we just got government off our backs no one would care who you were licking.


    patriot wrote on June 26, 2009 08:38 PM: Hey fair and balanced Fred, just to update you JESUS IS ALIVE< HE IS RISEN!!!!


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on June 26, 2009 07:06 PM: Let me go with my intuition here. I'm pretty sure, were Jesus alive today, he'd be against the war in Irag, against waterboarding and in favor of allowing same sex loving couples to marry.

    Just a hunch.


    zack wrote on June 26, 2009 05:57 PM: This country was founded by people who wanted to escape religious persecution, people who wanted the freedom to choose their own religion and their own beliefs and not be punished for those beliefs. This is true and these people also were not looking for handout which is really what this issue is about. I think everyone is willing to tolerate the gay lifestyle but they are not willing to pay for it. No one is saying you can't partner up with whoever you choose, they just are not willing to pay for your benefits. Nothing wrong with that.


    zack wrote on June 26, 2009 05:45 PM: I don't really care if you are gay, I don't support the lifestyle for the reasons I stated. I still treat everyone with respect. I will never understand how 2 dudes or 2 gals think some how they are entitled to benefits for the sole reason of who they choose as a partner. Whats next Human/any animal you choose lifestyle and the taxpayers/employers can pay for their benefits also. Hetrosexual couples get benefits because they have kids/families and keep the human species going. If we were all gay there would be no more human species. I am not sure how Homosexuals contribute to keeping mankind going. BE WITH WHO YOU WANT BUT DON'T EXPECT EVERYONE TO SUPPORT IT, TOLERATE YES BUT NOT SUPPORT AND I DON'T THINK THE TAXPAYERS OR YOUR EMPLOYER NEED TO PAY FOR THE BENEFITS.


    Benjy Ashley wrote on June 26, 2009 05:26 PM: No. You two are not like everybody else. You two are in the minority.


    jakevalentine wrote on June 26, 2009 05:19 PM: meh: "Well, you can either have liberty and justice for all, or you can't."

    Everybody was free to marry somebody of the opposite sex. I think you are implying that since some people couldn't rewrite the rules that it was not justice for all. With that being said, what happens when somebody wants to marry an inanimate object or an animal? With the logic you presented you can't block their pursuit of "liberty and justice for all" just because they want to rewrite the rules of marriage.

    The decadence of society is accelerating at an alarming pace because so many people are afraid of offending others and will not speak out.


    Read All Comments