Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
News


Panelists endorse Sotomayor to be high court justice

Las Vegas event organized by national group

Sonia Sotomayor deserves to be confirmed as the next U.S. Supreme Court justice, the judge's supporters said Wednesday in Las Vegas.

In a panel convened by a national Hispanic group that's lobbying on behalf of Sotomayor, UNLV Boyd School of Law Dean John White, state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and others said Sotomayor's qualifications are excellent, and her race and gender only add to her appeal.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • "There are many reasons why Ms. Sotomayor is qualified," Cortez Masto said. "The fact that she is a Latina is not one of them."

    Sotomayor's sterling educational credentials, her stints as a New York prosecutor and business litigator, and her time on the federal bench make her an ideal candidate for the nation's highest court, while her life as a Puerto Rican raised in the projects of the Bronx gives her a valuable perspective, Cortez Masto said.

    Cortez Masto and others on the panel addressed the 2001 speech in which Sotomayor said "a wise Latina" could "reach a better conclusion than a white male." Critics have cited the passage to argue that Sotomayor sees one race as superior to another.

    The panelists argued that Sotomayor meant all judges unavoidably bring their perspectives to bear on their decisions, from Justice Clarence Thomas, a black man from rural Georgia, to Justice Samuel Alito, whose grandparents were Italian immigrants.

    "We are not appointing a racist because she is a Latina," Cortez Masto said. "We are appointing a well qualified person with a differing perspective because of her life experience."

    Panelist Launce Rake of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada said a review of Sotomayor's judicial opinions reveals her to be a moderate, "not a firebrand liberal."

    Sylvia Lazos, a Boyd School professor who has researched diversity in the federal judiciary, said Sotomayor's "compassion" and "connection to the lives of real people" might make a difference in cases involving minority communities. She cited Ricci v. DeStefano, in which the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled for a group of white Connecticut firefighters, overturning the position of a panel that included Sotomayor.

    There were good arguments on both sides, Lazos said, and the lower court's position was one of judicial restraint, following established precedent rather than making new law.

    Also serving on the panel organized by Hispanics for a Fair Judiciary were Chelsie Campbell, a board member of the Las Vegas Latin Chamber of Commerce, and Felipe Ortiz, an ex-president of the National Latino Peace Officer Association. The audience was urged to call on Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., to support Sotomayor.

    Sotomayor's confirmation hearings are scheduled to begin Monday and observers expect her to sail through. A spokesman for Ensign, who has not taken a position on her nomination, said he is trying to schedule a meeting with her.

    A local group that has raised concerns about Sotomayor, while not opposing her nomination outright, said her record raises questions.

    "Judge Sotomayor's record indicates that she shows favoritism to certain groups over others and puts her political opinions and affiliations over the rule of law," said Ryan Erwin, a consultant to the Nevada Judicial Network, which is affiliated with the national Judicial Confirmation Network. "I'm not qualified to say whether or not she should be approved; however, there are clearly things that should give people pause."

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@ reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Steve F wrote on July 09, 2009 01:46 PM: Imagine that. An extremely left-wing radical racist group (probably all members of La Raza) supporting a fellow La Raza (the race) racist member. Who would have thought?


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on July 09, 2009 12:47 PM: Sonia Sotomayor is a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Sotomayor entered Princeton University on a full scholarship. She wrote opinion pieces for The Daily Princetonian. A history major, Sotomayor received almost all A's in her final two years of college.

    As a senior Sotomayor won the Pyne Prize, the top award for undergraduates, which reflected both strong grades and extracurricular activities. She was also elected to Phi Beta Kappa. In 1976 she was awarded an A.B. from Princeton, summa cum laude. In the fall of 1976, Sotomayor entered Yale Law School, again on a scholarship.

    She became an editor of the Yale Law Journal and was also managing editor of the student-run Yale Studies in World Public Order publication, which is now known as the Yale Journal of International Law. In her third year, she filed a formal complaint against the established Washington, D.C. law firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge for suggesting during a recruiting dinner that she was only at Yale via affirmative action. Sotomayor refused to be interviewed by the firm further and filed her complaint with a faculty-student tribunal, which ruled in her favor. Her action triggered a campus-wide debate and news of the firm's subsequent December 1978 apology made The Washington Post.

    In 1979 she was awarded a J.D. from Yale Law School. She was admitted to the New York Bar in 1980. She worked as an Assistant District Attorney in New York for five years before entering private practice in 1984.

    Sotomayor has ruled on several high-profile cases. In 1995, she issued a preliminary injunction against Major League Baseball which ended the 1994 baseball strike. Sotomayor made a ruling allowing The Wall Street Journal to publish Vince Foster's final note. In 1997, she was nominated by President Bill Clinton to the U.S. Court of Appeals.


    Zippy wrote on July 09, 2009 12:14 PM: Breaking news

    A national Hispanic group that's lobbying on behalf of Sotomayor endorses her with some fake official sounding panel.

    Whoopee


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on July 09, 2009 11:47 AM: Sonia Sotomayor is a federal judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Sotomayor entered Princeton University on a full scholarship. She wrote opinion pieces for The Daily Princetonian. A history major, Sotomayor received almost all A's in her final two years of college.

    As a senior Sotomayor won the Pyne Prize, the top award for undergraduates, which reflected both strong grades and extracurricular activities. She was also elected to Phi Beta Kappa. In 1976 she was awarded an A.B. from Princeton, summa cum laude. In the fall of 1976, Sotomayor entered Yale Law School, again on a scholarship.

    She became an editor of the Yale Law Journal and was also managing editor of the student-run Yale Studies in World Public Order publication, which is now known as the Yale Journal of International Law. In her third year, she filed a formal complaint against the established Washington, D.C. law firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge for suggesting during a recruiting dinner that she was only at Yale via affirmative action. Sotomayor refused to be interviewed by the firm further and filed her complaint with a faculty-student tribunal, which ruled in her favor. Her action triggered a campus-wide debate and news of the firm's subsequent December 1978 apology made The Washington Post.


    Erin wrote on July 09, 2009 11:10 AM: Guess what race Syvlia Lazos is? Yep, Hispanic -- shocking that she'd endorse Sotomayer!


    Tom, Burbank wrote on July 09, 2009 10:45 AM: "We are not appointing a racist because she is a Latina," Cortez Masto said.

    Correct. You are appointing a Latina because she is a racist. Soto'menor' didnt utter her most famous philosophical comment only once, she's stated it many times over the years. It's a race-based ideology she seems to believe in fervently. Cortez Masto, your little ethno-separatist group 'Hispanics for a Fair Judiciary' is a race-aligned group advocating for only one ethnic/heritage group, other people you deem like yourself. It's a backward, regressive way of thinking, damaging to the ideals of equality America has always striven toward.

    "Sylvia Lazos, a Boyd School professor who has researched diversity in the federal judiciary, said Sotomayor's "compassion" and "connection to the lives of real people,..." - So, Sylvia, what are 'real people'? Come on, I'll wait. Time's up, we get it, we know what you mean. Your thinly veiled bigotry is as ugly as your unwillingness to stand on your own feet as an individual as opposed to an ethno-identification. Start living like a human being instead of a race.


    Bad wrote on July 09, 2009 10:06 AM: Just another corrupt judge to abuse the people.


    Anthony wrote on July 09, 2009 09:56 AM: The only reason Sotomayer was EVEN NOMINATED is because she's 1) Female and 2) Hispanic. Without those "credentials," she's just an average candidate at best.

    How can we tolerate such blatant racism?


    vegasexec wrote on July 09, 2009 07:20 AM: She better be accompanied when she visits with Ensign as he may try to jump her bones!


    Mike Ault wrote on July 09, 2009 07:07 AM: "Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and others said Sotomayor's qualifications are excellent, and her race and gender only add to her appeal."

    "There are many reasons why Ms. Sotomayor is qualified," Cortez Masto said. "The fact that she is a Latina is not one of them."

    Huh? Try focusing, Cate... It may improve the performance of your day job.


    Read All Comments