Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Las Vegas businessman Kahre guilty of 57 counts

Federal charges against four included evading taxes, real estate fraud







A federal jury Friday found Las Vegas businessman Robert Kahre guilty of all 57 felony counts of evading taxes, failing to withhold taxes from workers' wages, and engaging in fraud during real estate transactions.

Three other defendants were found guilty of most, but not all, of their related charges.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford
  • NORM: CityCenter seeks presidential visit




  • Kahre had claimed he tried to legally avoid taxes by creating a cash payroll system that disbursed gold and silver coins, on the theory that recipients could go by the coins' face value for tax purposes.

    Though the trial lasted almost three months, the jury took only a day and a half to deliberate.

    As lengthy sheets of guilty verdicts were read, Kahre's longtime girlfriend Danille Cline sobbed, putting her head against him.

    Three jurors were observed crying, too. Some spectators, sitting on the defense side of the full courtroom, also were in tears.

    After the verdicts were accepted, federal prosecutor J. Gregory Damm asked Judge David Ezra to order the two male defendants, Kahre and Alex Loglia, into immediate custody.

    As Damm spoke, two law enforcement officers took positions in front of the spectator section, near the gate that separates the public from the rest of the courtroom.

    But Ezra permitted all four defendants to remain free until their Nov. 17 sentencings.

    The judge spoke to the 48-year-old businessman before denying the government's request to detain the two.

    Ezra asked Kahre for his word that he would not flee the community, nor commit violence nor encourage a "fringe element" to commit violence.

    Kahre nodded his head yes, that he would abide by the conditions.

    "Your honor," Kahre said when he stood to answer, "This last seventeen years of my life has been to get my issues" aired about taxation and the importance of a gold standard to back U.S. currency.

    "My life is basically over," Kahre said,, indicating that before sentencing he wants to "spend time with family and tie up some loose ends."

    He faces up to 296 years in prison and fines of up to $14 million, according to the U.S. Attorney's office.

    Kahre and co-defendant Danille Cline have four children, with the youngest born during Kahre's 2007 trial on similar charges. That trial, with nine defendants, ended in zero convictions.

    This time, Kahre was convicted in the payroll conspiracy, along with his sister, Lori Kahre, who works for him.

    But defendant Alex Loglia, who used to work for Kahre, was acquitted of his conspiracy charge.

    Lori Kahre was acquitted of one count, but she and Loglia were found guilty of multiple other counts of tax evasion.

    Cline was acquitted of two counts of wire fraud in connection with two home purchases, but she was convicted of another count involving a third real-estate transaction.

    Jurors accepted the prosecution theory that the couple bought themselves a series of homes in Cline's name and on the strength of her credit -- even though she had not worked outside the home in almost two decades -- in order to hide Kahre's income.

    The two held a commitment ceremony but do not have a marriage license, although they did not make those choices for any tax benefit, Kahre's defense attorneys have said.

    U.S. Attorney Gregory Brower said late Friday afternoon that he views the four acquittals as a sign that the jury carefully scrutinized each count.

    "It certainly was not a rubber stamp of the government's case," Brower said. "I can't say enough about the extraordinary efforts of the investigators, the prosecutors and the jury."

    In order to convict, jury members had to decide defendants knowingly broke federal tax laws, with a criminal intent rather than out of good-faith ignorance.

    Jurors rejected a recurring defense theme, that the defendants sincerely believed Congress gave them the permission to go by the dollar amounts stamped into the coins by the U.S. Mint.

    Certified public account Wayne Paul, brother of Texas congressman Ron Paul, testified that Congress created a dual monetary system when it authorized the gold and silver coins that currently circulate. That means, according to the accountant, that people can switch between coin and paper money, always going by the printed value.

    Prosecutors at the Kahre trial showed that defendants selectively assigned a value of their coin income -- switching between face value and market value -- depending on whether they were trying to lower their tax liability, or qualify for a home or car loan.

    Jurors heard how the payroll system operated. When workers at Kahre's six businesses and more than 30 companies that were payroll clients went to pick up their pay, each received a tube containing coins.

    Most immediately converted their coins to paper cash, in an amount equivalent to the coins' fair-market value.

    Kahre did not withhold taxes, because he classified all the workers were independent contractors, who are responsible for doing their own taxes.

    According to prosecutors, during the span of the payroll conspiracy, Kahre paid at least $25 million in untaxed wages to his workers, and about $95 million to people who worked for client companies.

    Kahre, or the defendants who worked for him, occasionally kept some pay in coin form. But prosecutors argued that the process of converting coin to paper money was a sham transaction, with no economic value, and was designed only to disguise tax evasion. As proof, prosecutors cited business records suggesting Kahre kept only $40,000 in coins in his business safe in one three-month period, during which he covered a payroll of about $8 million.

    When William Cohan, Kahre's attorney, argued for his client's release until sentencing, Cohan disclosed that he and Lisa Rasmussen, Kahre's other attorney, are not being paid for their representation. Cohan also said Kahre is virtually bankrupt.

    Federal and local law enforcement raided several Kahre business locations in 2003 to seize evidence in the tax investigation that culminated in Friday's verdicts. Since then, those businesses have gone downhill, losing customers and workers.

    Kahre wouldn't comment after the adjournment. He and Cline huddled with weeping relatives outside the courtroom. Then the two went to an office inside the courthouse to make arrangements for their pre-sentencing release.

    Defense attorneys said they intend to appeal the verdicts.

    Contact reporter Joan Whitely at jwhitely@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0268.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 132 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Gary T wrote on September 13, 2009 12:31 AM: Outrageous.
    The man followed the letter of the law, pre-researched it, counseled experts and officials; yet they prosecuted him for the what Congress said was perfectly legal.
    It sickens me when what is so obviously NOT a crime results in a successful businessman facing 300 years in prison.
    This is not justice, it is vengence against those who can think and follow the law, when that law doesn't fit the prosecutor's idea of how things should be.
    Ick.


    Cory wrote on September 08, 2009 07:55 AM: The United States survived just fine from 1776 to 1913 without any income tax at all. Federal Government has no right to collect for schools,police, fire fighters, or anything else specifically not listed in Article I section 8 of the Constitution. James Madison saw this abuse coming long before now when he wrote:

    "If Congress can employ money indefinitely to the general welfare,
    and are the sole and supreme judges of the general welfare,
    they may take the care of religion into their own hands;
    they may appoint teachers in every State, county and parish
    and pay them out of their public treasury;
    they may take into their own hands the education of children,
    establishing in like manner schools throughout the Union;
    they may assume the provision of the poor;
    they may undertake the regulation of all roads other than post-roads;
    in short, every thing, from the highest object of state legislation
    down to the most minute object of police,
    would be thrown under the power of Congress.... Were the power
    of Congress to be established in the latitude contended for,
    it would subvert the very foundations, and transmute the very nature
    of the limited Government established by the people of America."


    Jake wrote on September 07, 2009 12:51 PM: There are a lot of goof-balls commenting on this article. Kahre's scheme was clearly a scam transaction meant to steal tax dollars from the United States. While many commentors to this story think the United States government is some big bad guy trying to steal your money, I think it is important to point out that tax dollars are what pay for schools, roads, police officers, protection provided by the fire deparment, protection provided by the U.S. military, and the protection provided by the U.S. judiciary. Those protections are a main force in maintaining your civil liberties. Without law enforcement officers and judges, every American would be much more vulnerable to the will of criminals and must less able to protect themselves. Furthermore, when you send your kid to public school or drive to work on a paved road, it might be worthwhile to think about what life in the United States would be like if more people acted like Mr. Kahre. This man is in no way a hero and United States patriots should rally behind efforts to prosecute selfish individuals like Mr. Kahre. I hope that this man’s sentence is sufficiently severe to deter future criminal acts.


    such reporting wrote on September 01, 2009 07:42 AM: this battle was lost, never to be forgotten. people need to keep writing about this injustice. you may not agree with this man or all of his beliefs, but he is fighting for the working man to keep what he earns. if everyone takes a few minutes out of thier busy week and send an email to all of thier contacts about what this man was fighting for it will change the future for all. why is it that this trial was so hush hush??? you would have thought the feds would want everyone to know what was happening. there was no theft here. they were private contractors responsible for thier own taxes. if you are filing 10-99 you better check out what you are doing, its probably wrong...


    Silver Money wrote on August 28, 2009 12:11 PM: So if he hired independent contractors, how is he required to report their taxes anyway? Anyone with more than two brain cells can see that this trial is about dollar hegemony and keeping "the slaves" from using real money.

    I have my own conviction- That all federal employees should go to jail for fraud and corruption of our nation's legal system and racketeering. Also, they are indirectly debasing the currency which by law carries the death penalty.


    Mike Stroven wrote on August 28, 2009 07:39 AM: The Entire Federal Reserve system is a sham. This verdict is an outrage. The gov't is just ticked off that an average person beat them at their own game. Now he's being made an example to prevent other true American's from exploiting the corrupt government system!


    Jay wrote on August 27, 2009 10:45 PM: Wow! what a story. It seems totally unfair but then I have to ask myself 'what really happened?" The position of the government is that income is taxable and that has been setteled long ago. Was that legal? If it was then this guy if fighting against a superior force foolishly. He truly acted as a patriot trying to retify the situation that was spoiled by the unscrupulous... What is he thinkink? If your going to be a criminal just be one. it doesn't pay but it's more logical.
    sorry


    jay wrote on August 27, 2009 07:27 PM: Can I use this case law to report my income as the intrinsic value of the paper money that I receive as wages?

    Should I report "gains" to the IRS on the pennies that I receive back as change? The intrinsic value of the metal in old pennies is greater than the face value?

    Can I report electronic deposit gifts into my bank account as zero? There is no intrinsic value in a wire transfer - only "face" value on the transaction.


    Peaknik wrote on August 26, 2009 12:10 AM: 2007 copper price rose and made the metal value higher than the face value of the coins. Did that mean payment using copper coins should be counted at intrinsic rather than nominal value?? Of course not.

    How can Mints and Gov claim there is legal tender Gold/Silver coins and then not treat them as legal tender. This is a great unjustice and in older times angry mobs would have stormed the court. When is enough enough? When everyone is bancrupt? Have lost their properties? Had their gold confiscated? When they start WW3?
    Don't delude yourself. These gansters will try to take all you got.


    Joanna wrote on August 22, 2009 03:38 PM: This is a sad day for the republic. Mr. Kahre has commited no crime. DOJ/IRS are the criminal here. When would america wake up?


    Read All Comments