Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Valley immigration divide wide

Partnership between police, federal officials sparks heated discussions at town hall event







A town hall meeting on a controversial new partnership between Las Vegas police and federal immigration officials drew a bitterly divided crowd Thursday evening.

On one side of the commission chambers at the Clark County Government Center sat civil rights leaders and those who came to express fears that the partnership -- which facilitates enforcement of immigration laws on those who've been arrested -- could lead to racial profiling and make people afraid to report crimes.


Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz




  • On the other side sat those who favor tougher enforcement of immigration laws. They repeatedly interrupted the meeting, especially when a translator spoke in Spanish.

    "I don't understand what you are saying!" one woman yelled.

    "This is America; speak English!" others yelled.

    Organizers repeatedly reminded the crowd of about 150 to be respectful, threatening to throw out those who continued to interrupt.

    "There are few issues in America that are as emotional as the issue of immigration," said Launce Rake of the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada.

    PLAN, together with the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada and Democracia Ahora hosted the event to discuss the controversial 287(g) agreement the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement entered into last year.

    The pact, which was the first of its kind in Nevada, allows specially trained officers at the Clark County Detention Center to identify immigration violators and start deportation proceedings against them.

    The partnership's name is taken from a section of the federal Immigration and Nationality Act. But organizers and guests were able to discuss few specifics of the 287(g) partnership during the meeting, which was interrupted by angry protests.

    In the middle of it all were three Las Vegas police officers who had come to explain, and perhaps defend, the 287(g) partnership.

    Capt. John Donahue was repeatedly interrupted as he tried to explain that the partnership was meant to target violent criminals and wouldn't extend beyond the walls of the detention center.

    "Why are we permitting this anarchy to exist?" called out Daniel Neal Sr., who identified himself as a member of "Victorious Living for Conservatives."

    "Why does Metro pick and choose which laws they enforce?" another man said.

    Lost was any nuanced discussion of issues surrounding the 287(g) program.

    Nationally, dozens of local and state police groups have immigration partnerships with ICE. Civil rights leaders across the country have attacked the program as targeting Hispanics and causing fear in immigrant communities.

    Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano recently announced plans to expand the 287(g) program.

    Federal officials also drew up a new agreement, which participating law enforcement agencies have been asked to sign, intended to clarify that the program's priority is to deport immigrants who are criminal fugitives or are already behind bars.

    Locally, police have attempted to quell fears in the immigrant community by explaining that the program's purpose is to target violent criminals. But they and immigration officials have acknowledged that any illegal immigrants booked into the jail, regardless of the severity of charges against them and whether they're found innocent of those charges, could be subject to deportation.

    Some law enforcement entities, including the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office in Phoenix, have adopted broader versions of the 287(g) agreement, which allow them to form task forces to target illegal immigrants.

    Advocates for tougher enforcement of immigration laws on Thursday questioned why the Las Vegas police hadn't followed suit.

    "Why doesn't Metro round up and arrest illegals on the street?" a man asked.

    The heated nature of the meeting led Judy Cox, an attorney with the ACLU, to express her shock "at the amount of animosity toward our neighbors."

    "The last time I checked, hate was not an American value."

    Josephine Salinas and her friends came to the meeting to learn more about the 287(g) program, which they worry could unfairly target Latinos.

    They weren't able to get much information at Thursday's town hall. The atmosphere was so tense it scared the 43-year-old Salinas. "My heart was beating hard."

    Contact reporter Lynnette Curtis at lcurtis@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0285.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 248 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Arturo Medina wrote on September 02, 2009 09:18 PM: Mike, YOUR sources must be very limited indeed for you to say that Mexican authorities tend to "look the other way" when encountering people from Central America who have crossed Mexico's southern border illegally. I have a question for you: do you fluently speak, or at least understand the Spanish Language? If not, then I would hardly value ANYTHING that you say, which you've selectively gleaned from speaking to Hispanic immigrants. If you don't understand a language, then you TRULY understand only about a third of what someone who is struggling with English is actually trying to tell you. There are SO MANY NUANCES which only come through when you understand the speaker's words EXACTLY. BUENO, YO SI HABLO ESPANOL; WELL, I DO SPEAK (and understand, and read, and write) SPANISH, and I have heard MANY horror stories from especially Honduran immigrants who have come here illegally, through Mexico. Though difficult, it is easier for a Mexican illegal to reach the U.S. than it is for a Central American illegal. Part of this is obviously because Mexico is physically closer to the U.S.; but the bigger part is because Mexican illegals DO NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE 'SOUTH MEXICO GAUNTLET' through which Central (and South) Americans must pass. In my work over the last ten years, I have encountered MANY illegal Honduran and other Central American immigrants (NOT employed by me). Over and over again I have heard accounts of the routine robberies, the brutal rapes, and the frequent savage beatings inflicted on these hapless immigrants BY THE MEXICAN AUTHORITIES. The Mexican Rural Police are NOTORIOUS throughout Central America for doing this. Former President Fox even ADMITTED to this during his presidency. Mike, know the facts before you post; y no seas un menso!


    everday american wrote on September 02, 2009 02:44 PM: Its simple, every, every!! job taken by a illegal immigrant is a job that a REAL AMERICAN can't have. End of story, deportation will save our nation.


    Tim Ponsonby wrote on September 01, 2009 07:00 PM: GO HOME!!!


    Ken wrote on September 01, 2009 06:56 PM: How, can a law designed to (selectively) enforce ILLEGAL residence in this country strike fear in the Latino community, in anyone OTHER than those here ILLEGALLY?....If you are of Latin decent and living here legally, then, OBVIOUSLY, this law does not apply to you.....If a German, Italian, Swede, or whatever nationality they are, is not living here legally, then this law will apply to them as well.... Speaking of which, did the ACLU ensure the government had Swedish, German and Italian translators on hand during this meeting?.....If the answer is no, then how is THIS fair?....Why aren't ALL nationalities being represented equally in this matter, or is this just another case of reverse-discrimination?....Either represent EVERYONE EQUALLY, or design another system....Maybe the people who yell the loudest are the only ones who are paid attention to, eh?


    SLW wrote on September 01, 2009 08:50 AM: Amen Jennifer Hanshew


    jennifer hanshew wrote on September 01, 2009 06:17 AM: Why is there a problem or any objection to deporting illegal migrants that break the law and are violent offenders? This is acceptable and fair to migrants that are mindful of the law. Unfortunately our state is suffering from over migration that the state and local budget cannot support. Not without burden and drain on our already fragile economy. There is no ill will intended and to be fair justice must be served before mercy. It would truly be a diservice to the law and those who abide by it if went about a random mass deportation until we are able to regain a balance. There is no question why migrants left their own countries in hopes of a better life. However we do not tolerate criminal behavior or allow legal citizens to break the law and certainly do not have to tolerate visitors that break our laws and burden our legal system.


    SLW wrote on August 31, 2009 09:36 PM: ENOUGH of the race card!!! It's old, it's tired, it's played out. I agree that a few bad comments made here can be like the bad apple that ruins the bunch, but this issue is not about race!!! Please, pleas make an intelligent, articulate argument instead of inaccurate, knee-jerk, juvenile slurs. Tell us why it's good for our state to continue to use tax dollars to support those who come into our country illegally, who take gross advantage of our health system, who refuse to learn English even after years of living in the US and who complain about their child's education when they haven't paid a single penny into it? Are you not familiar w/the problems at UMC and illegals using the dialysis program b/c of a legal loophole? Or will you be arguing that it's the greedy-corporate insurance companies to blame? This isn't about race, it's about people breaking the law and law abiding citizens speaking out.


    Arturo Medina wrote on August 31, 2009 06:29 PM: Dear American of Hispanic Heritage

    No hay de que, y tiene usted razon.


    TONY wrote on August 31, 2009 03:41 PM: HOW DID THIS COUNTY GET SO

    UPSIDEDOWN...NOT THE USA OF 50 YRS AGO.



    2010 MID-TERM ELECTIONS

    CHANGE IS A COMMMIN............


    TONY wrote on August 31, 2009 03:40 PM: HOW DID THIS COUNTY GET SO
    UPSIDEDOWN...NOT THE USA OF 50 YRS AGO.

    2010 MID-TERM ELECTIONS
    CHANGE IS A COMMMIN............


    Read All Comments