Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Traffic study urges end of free parking

Transportation official scoffs at idea for Strip

Doing away with one of the Strip's long-standing freebies could ease traffic congestion, according to a new study.

But the study's recommendation to end free parking in the resort corridor as a solution to gridlock is being summarily dismissed by the Regional Transportation Commission, the commission's chief administrator said Wednesday.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested




  • The transportation commission might, however, consider improving streets, building new rapid transit lines and creating park-and-ride lots, as also suggested by the study.

    The pay-to-park plan "has no legs. I just don't see how that will work here in this community," said Jacob Snow, the commission's general manager. He said he believes the transportation commission's board shares that view.

    "I don't think this community is set up economically for that to happen," Snow said.

    An early version of the study, commissioned by Clark County planners and scheduled to be presented to the transportation commission today, claims the Las Vegas Valley will have a hard time sustaining growth unless commuters start using ways other than driving alone to work, play or shop.

    "Mobility within (the) Las Vegas Valley has reached a crisis point, with both residents and visitors trapped by congestion," said a study summary, prepared by Wilbur Smith Associates, a transportation and infrastructure engineering firm from Columbia, S.C.

    "Existing plans and policies will inadequately support further growth, meaning that even the desire to continue building will be stopped by congestion," the study said.

    Among its conclusions, the report suggests "finding ways to accommodate a high growth in person trips without also greatly increasing vehicle trips" in busy districts such as the resort corridor.

    The study believes one way to do that would be to end free parking, which in the resort corridor creates a "tremendous incentive for many to fight their way through congestion to bring their cars into overloaded areas" and ignore transit options, according to the study.

    "Paid parking must be a feature of the most congested areas, or those areas and the roads feeding them will suffer," the study said. "If businesses cannot organize to charge on their own, implement a parking fee for all vehicles that park inside the most congested areas, and use funds generated to help create" satellite parking lots that could be located around the edges of the resort corridor, linked by shuttle buses to major Strip properties.

    But Snow believes commuters instead could be lured to embrace mass transit options through other incentives. Currently, Strip employers who provide car pool programs or other such group commuting opportunities get a tax credit of $1,200 per employee enrolled in such efforts.

    While the rest of the study's suggestions are still on the table, Snow said the transportation commission isn't ready to commit to most of the concepts.

    "I don't think the RTC is saying we're going to put all our ducks behind any of these proposals," Snow said. "Most of these recommendations, we're going to have to develop some additional data to see if it's even feasible.

    "I think there are some good ideas in that report that need to be explored further," said Snow, adding that he was "confident we'll be able to accommodate that growth."

    The study's lead recommendation is one that the transportation commission already is pursuing actively: creation of a so-called "regional fixed guideway" along Las Vegas Boulevard, which would consist of an express bus using bus-only lanes and making limited "station" stops, to mimic the speed and patterns of a train.

    The study also calls for the re-engineering of various streets to improve traffic circulation, including the Paradise Road/Swenson Street corridor; around the Strip and Las Vegas Beltway; and on Boulder Highway and Blue Diamond Road.

    In many cases, the work could involve creating "couplets" of parallel one-way streets, or the conversion of some streets into freewaylike "superarterials" that use overpasses and onramps in place of stoplights and intersections.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Nancy Henry wrote on April 12, 2007 12:59 PM: As a former long time resident of the Las Vegas\Henderson area I think the planning commission should have thought about future traffic issues BEFORE they approved development in areas that were oversaturated to begin with; both residential and commercial. How many new homes and new casinos does the LV Valley really need anyway? Can you say "money, money, money?"


    Report abuse

    Matt Belger wrote on April 12, 2007 12:09 PM: Paid parking has done wonders for Neonopolis. While congested roads pose a serious problem, paying for parking is not the solution. The cars in the parked in the parking lots are not congesting traffic; it’s the cars on the roads. Reducing the desirability of parking spaces will reduce rental cars, and increase taxis. When tourists don’t rent cars, they turn to taxis, not buses. This is because buses are uncomfortably crowded, very slow, involve long walks, and make transporting luggage extremely cumbersome. The solution is creating a viable ways to get between destinations other than cars. These solutions need to a least as comfortable and convenient as a car, or people won’t use it. This is the problem now, the few alternatives we currently have are simply too inconvenient. I believe connecting the monorail to the airport would be a good start. Also setting up check in desks closer to the monorail stations would help. Ultimately, I’d like to see a subway. Paid parking is just adding one more headache for our visitors and ourselves. I suspect the proponents of this proposal are in line to share some of the profits. To be sure, will be serious profits if this goes though. I believe this is really just all about the money. Don’t Buy it!


    Report abuse

    Byron Walker wrote on April 12, 2007 09:54 AM: I like the idea of pay to park in the heavy traffic areas, but thats almost everywhere, something needs to change because the traffic is out of control, and so many drive with no regard for their own safety or anyone else. As far as building new roads, the roads we have are in disrepair and it is obvious that the road maintenance crews cant keep up with the current demands, and I too live close to my work, i think more people should try to do the same, less stress, less wear and tear on the car and less fuel burned and that means less pollution.I also think to lessen congestion on the strip, close the roads directly in front of the Hotels and turn them into pedestrian areas only, each section could be beautifully landscaped and they could be like little parks in front of each property.


    Report abuse

    Deborah Mancha wrote on April 12, 2007 09:01 AM: Hello, maybe this is a dumb question but i am a firm believer that the only dumb question is the one not asked so here goes: Why can't we build mass transit subways like in New York/El trains? It would generate money for the city as well as solve the transportation problems? Just a thought as i have no knowledge of engeneering. Sincerly Deborah Mancha


    Report abuse

    alan berk wrote on April 12, 2007 06:09 AM: Too funny- Las vegas has ground to a halt! Gee there are thousands of homes East of the strip to boulder hi-way and people are too stupid to live there. If you live in the Northwest or summerlin or Mountains edge - you deserve to sit in traffic. it is 8 minutes from my house to the Valet at the Bellagio! 10 minutes to the airport- 10 minutes to the convention center. Wake-up and live near where you work and play! Not a single new road should be built.