Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


Titus will try to amend bill

Unfunded mandate in cervical cancer vaccine measure raised concerns

CARSON CITY -- Senate Minority Leader Dina Titus said Tuesday she will try to amend her bill requiring most insurance providers to make a cervical cancer vaccine available to young women, in an effort to get the legislation to the Assembly.

Titus, D-Las Vegas, said she will seek today to remove the provision in Senate Bill 409 requiring self-insured health plans, including those provided by many local government entities, including Clark County, to offer the vaccine.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • North Las Vegas motorcyclist killed in collision while racing, police say
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying




  • It was this unfunded mandate to local governments that caused the Senate to reconsider the measure Monday and place it on the chief clerk's desk, where it will die by April 24 if not passed out to the Assembly.

    The bill passed the Senate 12-9 Friday, but Sen. Mark Amodei, R-Carson City, asked for it to be reconsidered because of the unfunded mandate. On a party line 11-10 vote Monday, the bill was put in legislative limbo.

    Amodei and Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, had voted for the bill Friday. Both expressed concerns about the mandate to local governments, however.

    After the cancer vaccine bill was put on the desk, Titus tried to force reconsideration of an unrelated measure favored by Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, calling for the appointment of district judges and Supreme Court justices. Titus said her effort was not because of politics. But she failed Tuesday to gain enough support to amend the measure, so it has gone to the Assembly.

    Titus said she will try to amend the vaccine bill to erase the concern about an unfunded mandate to local government and allow for its passage, but she was not happy that some local governments were opposed to offering the vaccine.

    "I'm going to take the local governments out of it, and there will be no fiscal note," she said. "And that should address Sen. Townsend's concerns."

    But, Titus added, "The local governments who oppose doing this do cover prostate cancer screenings, which are much more expensive than the cervical cancer vaccinations. I'm going to shame them. I hope they look real bad because they should."

    Nine other Republicans voted against the bill Friday because of the mandate that insurance companies provide the vaccine, so any vote on the measure could still be close.

    Sabra Smith-Newby, a lobbyist for Clark County, said the county's opposition comes only because the members of the self-funded plan decide what should be covered.

    "To mandate coverage goes against our self-governed plan," she said. "Our members would make that determination."

    Smith-Newby said the county has estimated the benefit would cost it $215,000. The vaccine requires three injections at $120 per injection for a total of $360 per person, she said.

    Ted Olivas, a lobbyist for the city of Las Vegas, said the city is not opposed to the mandate. The cost of the vaccine is far outweighed by its preventive nature and the costs associated with cancer treatment, he said. The city is looking at adding the vaccine on its own, Olivas said.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Philene O'Keefe wrote on April 18, 2007 01:33 PM: Although SB 409 has since passed the Senate and been passed to the Assembly, please note that when a measure is taken off the Senate General File, it is placed on the Secretary's desk. When it is taken off General file in the Assembly, it is placed on the Chief Clerk's Desk.