Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

News


Poll respondents: Don't give illegal immigrants scholarships




Most Nevadans believe that undocumented immigrants should not be eligible for the Millennium Scholarship, according to a poll commissioned by the Review-Journal.

The poll also found that a majority think ballots should be printed only in English and businesses should be fined or cited for employing undocumented workers.

"These questions hit a nerve," said Brad Coker, managing partner of Washington, D.C.'s Mason-Dixon Polling & Research firm that conducted the April 30 through May 1 poll. "There's not a whole lot to say when you've got over 70 percent responding" the same way.

The telephone poll of 625 registered voters found that 72 percent of Nevadans believe illegal immigrants who graduate from Nevada high schools should not be allowed to receive the Millennium Scholarship. Seventy-seven percent feel that ballots and state documents should not be printed in languages other than English. And 81 percent said Nevada businesses should be cited and fined for employing illegal aliens.


Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush
  • Durango teacher accused of sex acts with student



  • The results have a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    Immigration reform activists and Hispanic leaders challenged the poll's results.

    "There is a way to skew things (with polls)," said Fernando Romero, president of Hispanics in Politics. "I don't think the poll reflects the diversity of the community."

    The results paralleled an August 2006 Review-Journal poll, which found 77 percent of voters statewide were opposed to providing in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants, while 19 percent supported it. Among Hispanic voters, 52 percent opposed providing the tuition benefit to noncitizens and 46 percent supported it.

    Of the more recent survey, Coker said about 10 percent of those polled were Hispanic, and the margin of error among that group is higher: plus or minus 12 percentage points.

    Hispanics comprise about 25 percent of Nevada's population.

    Among Hispanics polled, 57 percent said illegal immigrants should be allowed to receive the Millennium Scholarship, Coker said. Sixty-four percent said that businesses should be cited for employing illegal immigrants.

    Hispanic respondents were split on the issue of printing ballots in languages other than English, with 48 percent saying ballots should be printed in other languages and 47 percent saying they shouldn't.

    Romero pointed out that the printing of ballots in other languages is protected by the federal Voting Rights Act.

    The poll respondents "are disagreeing with federal law," he said, adding that if the Voting Rights Act had been mentioned in the poll's question, the answers may have been different.

    But, Coker said, "there's legal opinion and there's public opinion."

    When asked what is the most important issue that the Legislature should address this session, "Illegal immigration" was the second-most-popular answer. Education and teacher pay was the most popular.

    The Legislature is considering two bills that deal with noncitizens' eligibility for the Millennium Scholarship and a third measure to make English the official language of Nevada.

    Sen. Joe Heck, R-Henderson, introduced Senate Bill 415, which would make any state financial aid offered by the Nevada System of Higher Education off limits to illegal residents of Nevada.

    He said he was not surprised by poll results showing a majority of Nevadans don't want the Millennium Scholarship to go to students who are in the country illegally.

    "It's not a fringe issue," he said.

    Heck said he proposed the bill to bring Nevada in line with federal law.

    "Illegals can't get federal student aid," he said.

    Romero said that disallowing undocumented immigrants from obtaining the Millennium Scholarship is "closing the door on the future of our children."

    He also said business owners should not be responsible for enforcing immigration laws.

    "Employers are not immigration officials," he said.

    Iris Contreras, a community organizer for the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, agreed and said poll respondents were expressing "anti-immigrant" sentiments.

    "I always say the people who have time to answer these questions ... probably don't work or are retired," she said. "They are more likely to have these anti-immigrant feelings."

    The alliance recently released a report stating that immigrants, both legal and illegal, contribute millions of dollars to the Nevada economy and make up an inextricable part of the work force.

    The Legislature is also considering a bill that would allow the state Tax Commission to pull the business licenses of companies that hire undocumented workers. That would not occur, however, until Congress passes legislation on illegal immigration.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Aaron Bitton wrote on January 12, 2008 06:14 PM: Americans dont realize the severity of the illegals problem in America.12million illegals in America i say its more like twenty million illegals or more.The real; problem starts when theses millions of illegals have children,A family of illegals have about three to five children,Do the math.In a few years no more America like we know it.


    jazmin wrote on September 24, 2007 10:04 AM: i think this is rediculous!! how can you not give those students a chance to go to college?! i beleive that if they don't get that opportunity than well you know what!?, the only ones that are goin to look stupid are those who are not accepting it because one of those students may be the next michael jordan and the other the next scientist to find a cure for cancer. if you send these students back home you're going to send them educated with a better future for their country not yours! so go ahead and be selfish because all you're doing is making america be a dream of freedom and justice, but a dream that will never be realistic with these type of people in this country.


    Lorrie wrote on June 18, 2007 05:56 PM: First, forget all the political rhetoric and call it as it is...

    No such term as "undocumented immigrates." Those who disregarded our laws by entering our country illegally are "Illegal Aliens."

    To Mr. Fernando Romero, president of Hispanics in Politics, the only entities skewing poll results is your office and other similar ethnic organizations advocating a Hispanic "Open Borders" policy.

    Mr. Romero's statement that disallowing undocumented immigrants from obtaining the Millennium Scholarship is "closing the door on the future of our children" is IGNORANT!

    These are not our children, they are children of foreign Nationals who have loyalty only to there country of origin.

    To Ms. Iris Contreras, community organizer for the Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada, your racist, discrimative comment that poll respondents were expressing "anti-immigrant" sentiments reflects the one with nothing better to do all day is you.

    If Ms. Iris Contreras were less ignorant and more educated, she would realize the only "anti- sentiments" that are expressed are the "anti-American" name calling & bashing coming from her and others like her with the same agenda for "Open Border Policy".

    Finally, illegal immigrates use fraudulant documents or steal the identities of Americans and no-way to know the tax revenue, if any, illegals contribute to the economy.

    What we do know, $98 billion a year - is the illegal immigration cost to American citizens.

    And Ms. Iris Contreras, not only do I have a job, I own the company.


    Lorrie wrote on May 24, 2007 09:54 PM: Illegal is illegal... it's not discrimation, not racist and it is definetly not anti-immigrant" sentiments." We live in a nation of laws and when you enter our country illegally, you broke the la

    It is ignorance to blur the line between legal immigration and illegal immigration. You do not have to be a rocket scientist to understand this!

    This nation is a nation of immigrates, "legal immigrates", those who did not break our laws.

    The proper term in our country is "Illegal aliens', as define by U.S. Code : Title 8 : Section 1325 "ALIENS AND NATIONALITY ACT".

    "Undocumented Persons" is not defined nor recognized in any Federal, State or Local Statue.

    US citizens are not responsible to fix the poverty & educational problems of Mexico and South America.

    It is pure anarchy for those who think we owe you entitlements for entering this country illegally.

    If you don't like our laws, go back to your native country and demand your rights from your government.


    Bob wrote on May 13, 2007 06:34 AM: Get ALL illegals out of this country, fine any business employing them and if that doesn't work close the business down. No illegal should get schooling, medical care or any benefit from me or other taxpayers. There are legal ways of coming into our country. Any illegal here needs to get out now! Too ship the "Hispanics in Politics" and the ACLU with them!


    Joe C wrote on May 04, 2007 03:17 PM: Fernando Romero is absolutely correct about polls being skewed. Pro-illegal alien supporters use skewed polls and biased studies that continually leave out many costs that burden taxpayers.
    One poll that can’t be skewed is when bills are actually voted on. Bills in any state, halting benefits and favorite treatment to illegals, have passed easily, by a good majority. Plus, many Hispanic/Latino voting in these states. (California Arizona as example)
    As far as Employers doing federal work, it’s been going on forever, banks, casino’s, even car dealerships fill out forms having to with cash transactions for the IRS to stop money laundering. So employers have taken on processes for the federal government and trained to spot illegal activity, which is what illegal aliens are doing, illegal activity.
    Those like Romero seem to want favorite treatment for they’re own. We could soon be giving 12 to 20 million illegal aliens the ability to vote. The greatest reward given to legal citizen, rewarded to lawbreakers, most voting for they’re own concerns.
    Romero and Contreras, are truly trying to dismiss and discredit anything that opposes their agendas. Even claiming people are just too tired. Disgusting and dishonest!


    Joe C wrote on May 04, 2007 01:39 PM: Fernando Romero is absolutely correct about polls being skewed. Pro-illegal alien supporters use skewed polls and biased studies that continually leave out many costs that burden taxpayers.
    One poll that can’t be skewed is when any bills actually voted on, in any state, halting benefits and favorite treatment to illegals, the bills pass easily, by a good majority. Plus many Hispanic/Latino voting in these states. (California Arizona as example)
    As far as Employers doing federal work, it’s been going on forever, banks, casino’s, even car dealerships fill out forms having to with cash transactions for the IRS to stop money laundering. So employers have taken on processes for the federal government and trained to spot illegal activity, which is what illegal aliens are doing, illegal activity.
    Those like Romero seem to want favorite treatment for their own and seem somewhat racist. We could soon be giving 12 to 20 million illegal aliens the ability to vote. The greatest reward given to legal citizen, rewarded to lawbreakers, most voting for their own concerns; and I’m unsure how many are really racist and the effect this will have on America, especially black Americans.
    The honest and un-skewed polls, the legal vote tells a different story than what Romero likes to hear.


    Joe C wrote on May 04, 2007 01:30 PM: Fernando Romero is absolutely correct about polls being skewed. Pro-illegal alien supporters use skewed polls and biased studies that continually leave out many costs that burden taxpayers.
    One poll that can’t be skewed is when bills are actually voted on. In any state across the nation, halting benefits and favorite treatment to illegals the bills pass easily, by a good majority. Plus many Hispanic/Latino voting in these states. (California Arizona as example)
    As far as Employers doing federal work, it’s been going on forever, banks, casino’s, even car dealerships fill out forms having to with cash transactions for the IRS to stop money laundering. So employers have taken on processes for the federal government and trained to spot illegal activity, which is what illegal aliens are doing illegal activity.
    Those like Romero seem to want favorite treatment for their own and seem somewhat racist. We could soon be giving 12 to 20 million illegal aliens the ability to vote. The greatest reward given to legal citizen, rewarded to lawbreakers, most voting for their own concerns; and I’m unsure how many are really racist and the effect this will have on America, especially black Americans.
    The honest and un-skewed polls, the legal vote tells a different story than what Romero likes to hear.


    Frank wrote on May 04, 2007 01:25 PM: Illegal immigrant students should not be able to earn this scholarship; it should only be granted to legal citizen students. Giving scholarships and in-state tuition (ten states do this, with Texas giving illegal immigrant students financial aid) only encourages more illegal immigrant students to enter the system, and use more money. It may also encourage more illegal immigration to this country, and this is a practice that needs to end nationwide. People who break the law should be rewarded for their actions.


    Kris R. wrote on May 04, 2007 10:12 AM: I feel that Mr. Romero, Ms. Contreras and other community organizers that are fighting for the "rights" of undocumented/illegal immigrants are essentially condoning breaking the law. Is there some ambiguity to the word "illegal?"

    I appreciate their concern for the education of children in this state but these immigrants are not citizens of the country and should not be afforded the same benefits as those with legal citizenship. Scholarships and federal aid are issues that are outside the basic constitutional rights of persons in this country.

    I was personally offended by the recent protest march during which illegal immigrants demand recognition and demand the rights equal to citizenship in this country. There is a process in place to obtain legal status in this country - they should be filing for citizenship.

    Come to think of it, why weren't Immigration Officers present at these marches picking up illegal immigrants and preparing them for deportation?

    Is there some reason why we turn a blind eye to this?

    Oh... we're supposed to simply roll over and say "oh.. okay... we were only kidding when we said you have to obtain legal status..."

    But if that's the case, aren't we also saying we're only kidding when we say that rape, robbery and murder is illegal?

    As for bi-lingual materials - the native language of United States, as recognized world-wide, is English. While accommodation of various languages, in certain circumstances, is reasonable and logical, the requirement should only go so far.

    If I'm not mistaken, speaking English is a requirement of obtaining citizenship in the US. And, since you have to be a US citizen to vote, you should be able to speak, read and write English. And we're considering printing bi-lingual voting ballots… why???

    Thank you for the opportunity to express my thoughts.


    Read All Comments