Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun

sponsored by
News


Replacement assigned for Halverson

The state Supreme Court on Friday assigned a senior judge to indefinitely replace District Judge Elizabeth Halverson, who court officials say breached courthouse security.

Officials changed the locks and deactivated the rookie judge's key card to enter secured areas on Thursday night after Chief Judge Kathy Hardcastle barred her from entering the Regional Justice Center. The lockout is in place until Halverson agrees to meet with court officials, who have said the judge has grown increasingly paranoid that everyone is against her.


Most Popular Stories
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested




  • "She's created something in her mind that just doesn't exist," Hardcastle said Friday.

    Halverson did not come to work Friday. Attorneys for the one case she was set to hear had asked for a delay earlier in the week.

    Hardcastle issued an administrative order barring Halverson after she refused to discuss with judges why on Wednesday she circumnavigated security procedures and brought two private bodyguards into secured areas of the courthouse. It was unclear if the bodyguards carried firearms, though one had an extendable metal rod.

    "She refused to meet with us yesterday, with the presiding judges, to discuss the various issues and concerns about security," Hardcastle said. "Instead, she locked herself in the office when people tried to talk to her."

    Senior Judge Stephen Huffaker will preside over her department starting Monday.

    Halverson did not return phone calls from the Review-Journal. She previously has said that court officials have a vendetta against her. Her friends and family have said the judge believes Hardcastle is targeting her because of past feuds.

    Since she was elected to Nevada's busiest state court in November, Halverson has been under scrutiny because of her lack of trial experience.

    She served as a law clerk for nine years in District Court, a job that involves researching decisions for judges. Most attorneys clerk for a year or two before practicing law. Citing the temporary nature of the position, Hardcastle fired Halverson in 2004. Halverson then ran unsuccessfully for a Family Court judgeship against Hardcastle's then-husband. She started her own firm before running for the seat she won in November.

    "Judge Hardcastle cannot seem to sit with the fact that Las Vegas voters believed in Elizabeth Halverson and wanted to give her a chance to be the brilliant judge that I know and they know she is capable of being," said Halverson's sister, Angela La Macchia, of California. "I personally think the voters in Las Vegas will see through Judge Hardcastle's agenda and games."

    Hardcastle called such allegations "ludicrous."

    Halverson "doesn't recognize that her behavior is causing problems for the court's litigants and the other judges," Hardcastle said.

    She said Halverson has not contacted judges since the lockout.

    Attorney Bob Spretnak, who is representing Halverson on another matter involving a former bailiff, said Friday he had not had any contact with his client about the courthouse lockout.

    "I'm very optimistic this can be resolved before things get too heated," Spretnak said.

    He said he believes Halverson could make an argument in federal court that her constitutional right to due process was violated because "the lockout occurred prior to any sort of hearing being given."

    On Thursday, Hardcastle sent Halverson a memo asking her to remove her private bodyguards from the courthouse and notified her that the judges were having a noon meeting at which they could discuss Halverson's concerns. When Hardcastle received no answer, the judges asked Las Vegas police to act as mediators.

    "They got nowhere with her," Hardcastle said.

    Hardcastle's fellow judges then agreed with her proposal to bar Halverson from the courthouse until she agreed to meet with them.

    "We supported it because it was the right thing to do," said District Judge Stewart Bell.

    "They (her bodyguards) came through private, unsecured entrances, so, hell, they could have had a machine gun for all I knew," Bell said. "My hope is today, tomorrow, or the next day some sort of accord on this can be reached, and Judge Halverson can go back to work."

    Jeff Stempel, a professor with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas Boyd School of Law, said this highly unusual situation highlights the need for appointed instead of elected judges.

    He also questioned where the power of a strong chief judge ends.

    "It troubles me a little that if you are going to elect a judge, that someone else can keep them from judging," he said.

    He said both sides might be overreacting.

    "It seems like trying to swat a fly with a bazooka on both sides, to be honest, both Judge Halverson bringing in the security guards and Judge Hardcastle barring her from the premises," Stempel said.

    Court spokesman Michael Sommermeyer said court officials learned through police that Halverson was upset court officials in April reassigned the bailiff she hired in January, Johnny Jordan. She thought she wasn't adequately protected by the other bailiffs who had been pulling temporary duty in her courtroom.

    "She increasingly became suspicious of them and accused them of being spies and was rude and condescending to them to the point that some of them were indicating to us that they would refuse to go to her courtroom," Hardcastle said.

    The bailiff was reassigned because he filed a complaint with the Clark County Office of Diversity, said court officials, who cannot rehire a permanent bailiff for her until that complaint is resolved.

    Halverson will continue collecting her $130,000 a year salary and can work on cases at home through an electronic case management system, said Chuck Short, court administrator.

    Her court recorder and law clerk tried to go to work Friday morning but could not enter the court chamber. Short said court administration escorted them to Halverson's chamber to collect personal and professional items so they could continue to work elsewhere.

    Court officials also videotaped Halverson's chambers to stymie any suggestion that court administrators stole items from her, Short said.

    Because of their past disputes, Hardcastle said she appointed three veteran judges in April to give Halverson counsel after the new judge unknowingly broke the law and spoke to two deliberating juries without attorneys present.

    "I've been very careful to make sure the matters are considered by a committee of judges," Hardcastle said. "They've tried working with her, but she refused after the first meeting to work with them."

    As chief judge, she cannot remove a judge from office during a judge's term.

    Voters can recall serving judges, the Legislature can impeach them, which has never happened, and the Commission on Judicial Discipline can remove them after an ethics complaint and a public hearing, said David Sarnowski, executive director of the commission.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Emma C wrote on May 15, 2007 01:07 PM: Judge Halverson came to my place of work to meet people. My first thoughts were not positive. But when I heard her speak and saw who she was beyond the obvious, she earned my vote.

    I would still vote for you Judge Halverson.

    Judge Hardcastle's attempt to maligne and degrade you is mean spirited and downright sick and evil.

    Judge Hardcastle, How can you sleep at night.


    Report abuse

    Nameless wrote on May 14, 2007 08:47 AM: OK - VOTERS - - HELLO.... You are all failing to realize that VOTERS SHOULD BE EDUCATED. Do none of you think dirty politics would prevail in appointing judges? C'mon, I know you are all smarter than that. Well maybe not, you voted for HALVERSON AND HARDCASTLE!!! Just EDUCATE YOURSELF! Does Hardcastle have an ax to grind? SURE. Is Halverson a poor judge? SURE. There are NO CLEAN HANDS IN THIS MESS.


    Report abuse

    Sebastian wrote on May 13, 2007 10:19 AM: Cudos to Judge Hardcastle in this difficult situation. She has handled the situation with the utmost professionalism. The hapless voting public elected Halverson without any idea of her lack of qualifications. More support for appointment of district court judges.


    Report abuse

    Ginger wrote on May 13, 2007 07:50 AM: This is one of the reasons why judges should be appointed!!!
    It would put an end to the unscrupulous contributors, and in this case, the complete ignorance of the average voters regarding the importance of an office/political platform.

    Prof. Jeff Stempel is correct in his statement “this is a highly unusual situation.” However, I am glad that there was a check and balance to the system; keeping a very incompetent elected official from doing further harm. Judge Hardcastle should be commended for doing a very difficult job and doing the right thing!

    Thank you for your report.


    Report abuse

    Rogelio P. Viado wrote on May 13, 2007 05:56 AM: I'm disgusted. I'd met and talked to her before the election. My family and I gave her our election votes. She is disgusting!


    Report abuse

    Alex wrote on May 13, 2007 01:34 AM: Nigel: Do you know Judge Halverson? You speak as if you do or your information is wrong. Guess what? I DO know her and your information is wrong. Sounds like you may be personally involved in slandering her. Hmmmm? What could your motive be. Is there anything else you might try to discredit her on rather than her bathroom needs? I don't think voters vote for judges based on when they use the ladies room and how often.


    Report abuse

    Mike Harris wrote on May 12, 2007 07:25 PM: It sounds like Chief Justice Hardcastle does not know what the bounds of her authority is.

    If she does not manage Halverson why is she acting like she does? Talk about Megomanic.

    I think both these women are nuts...maybe both Halverson and Hardcastle need some professional help.
    At minimum they should in no way be in direct management of each other professionaly.

    Halverson is new at this.. but Hardcastle should know better.

    Grow up Ladies.


    Report abuse

    nigel wrote on May 12, 2007 07:09 PM: Judge Halverson is the exact reason why judges should be appointed.

    The news doesn't tell you some of the stuff she really makes her secretary, baliff, clerks and recorder do. They also include changing out her catheter and colostomy bag, tying her shoes and so on. She never takes breaks during proceedings because she doesn't need them while everyone else is on the verge of bursting from having to go to the bathroom so bad.

    She doesn't have nearly enough experience in presiding over any cases or trying any cases to be an effective judge at all.

    She needs to be impeached or recalled and taken off the bench until she can get more experience under her belt. If she would actually listen to the panel that is helping her, she could learn a multitude of things and gain a wealth of knowledge. It's unfortunate she is to stubborn to actually do it.


    Report abuse

    Marilyn wrote on May 12, 2007 01:03 PM: So what statue(NRS) or State constituiton article gave Hardcastle the authority to do that?

    Hardcaste was trying to restore order? Sounds like she is the one creating the chaos. It sounds pretty clear Hardcastle has a score to settle here.

    Voters are not embarrased. They are angry that Halverson was not given a chance.








    Report abuse

    Dominique wrote on May 12, 2007 12:19 PM: It is not confusing. Removal from office is a permanent and formal procedure that is prescribed either by statute (NRS) or by the State Constitution. That appears to be coming down the turnpike on a sooner rather than later basis and for good reason. Halvorsen is a complete embarassment to the Court and to the people that voted for her. She should resign ASAP.

    Here, Judge Hardcastle took temporary measures to restore order in the courthouse by locking this nutcase out until she meets with her "advisory committee" comprised of Judge Bell, Judge Ritchie, and Judge Gonzalez(read: unpaid babysitters) and explains her outrageous conduct and shows that she can follow rules like everyone else. This is not "removal from office."

    This is such a nightmare for the Court. The Eighth Judicial District is already overworked, overburdened, and understaffed. The last thing we need here is a narcissistic megolomaniac like Halvorsen creating problems and stirring up drama where none exists.


    Read All Comments