Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

sponsored by
News


JOHN L. SMITH: The Halverson-Hardcastle harangue cries out for a change of venue

I have long suspected the Regional Justice Center was cursed.

No, really.


Most Popular Stories
  • 'YOU DON'T BLOW A BUNCH OF CASH IN VEGAS ...': Obama remark reopens wound
  • NORM: Ad's Strip scenes raised eyebrows
  • LAUGHLIN EDGEWATER: Two dead in casino car crash
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • NORM: $1 million wager on Super Bowl approved
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • IMAGES FROM 1860S: Photos show historic Nevada
  • Fighter battles rare disease that shatters mixed martial arts dream
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley




  • From its architectural quirks to its costly construction delays, the $185 million money pit was millions over budget and four years overdue when it opened its doors in November 2005. The building was a local laughingstock before it began dispensing justice.

    An edifice meant to symbolize the sanctity of our legal system wound up looking like the world's largest comedy club. Take my leaky roof, please.

    The laughter has only risen since then, and last week it reached a cynical crescendo with the banning of hapless judicial rookie Elizabeth Halverson by her arch-enemy/second banana District Judge Kathy Hardcastle.

    What a joke.

    Halverson's hamstrung judicial career began earlier this year when she took office and immediately ran afoul of the chief judge. Halverson was a law clerk for nine years before Hardcastle fired her in 2004. Halverson later ran unsuccessfully for the Family Court judicial seat held by Hardcastle's former husband, Gerald Hardcastle.

    So much for collegiality and professionalism.

    The complaints against Halverson began to pile up the moment she took office. Staffers exited, attorneys complained, and Hardcastle was there to bust her chops at every turn.

    Halverson made the chief judge's job easy by failing to engage her colleagues and lacking the energy and sound reasoning taxpayers ought to be able to expect from someone they're paying six figures a year. Tales of Halverson falling asleep on the bench and making odd and obnoxious requests of staffers were common.

    Off the bench, Clark County inspectors received an anonymous complaint and were called out to Halverson's messy residence. A citation was issued, and accurate but mortifying stories followed in the media.

    As amazing as this might sound, that's nothing compared to the chaos that ensued in her courtroom last week. Halverson was accompanied to court, one of the most heavily guarded buildings in the state, by two bodyguards, one of whom carried a telescoping, clublike weapon called an ASP. She later locked herself in her chambers with her personal security team.

    Halverson had yet another parting of the ways with a judicial executive assistant, this time with courthouse veteran Ileen Spoor, who told the Review-Journal she believed the rookie judge had gone crazy and had taken her personal belongings and private e-mail before bailiffs and Metro officers were called in.

    It's also true that Halverson confiscated from Spoor's desk a file folder said to be filled with outstanding traffic tickets.

    Which raises the question of whether someone was fixing tickets for favored attorneys and friends in keeping with a long judicial tradition in Southern Nevada.

    Can you believe your tax dollars are paying these people's salaries?

    Wronged or not, Spoor can expect some pointed questions.

    "We're not going to allow people to do something illegal," a justice center official said. "But it's not her (Halverson's) job to investigate that."

    Court spokesman Michael Sommermeyer said, "We would want to know about it. That's revenue that goes back to the court."

    There's plenty to investigate, including whether a bomb threat was related to the incident.

    On Thursday, Chief Judge Hardcastle issued a statement banning Halverson from the courthouse. Hardcastle had the backing of Presiding Judges Stewart Bell, Art Ritchie and Betsy Gonzalez, all of whom have tried unsuccessfully to mentor Halverson.

    Halverson gave her enemies, real and perceived, all the ammunition they needed when she brought two bodyguards to the courthouse and allowed them to avoid detection. At least the SWAT Team wasn't called out -- don't laugh, it could have happened -- and no one was injured.

    If they truly had the best interests of our beleaguered local judicial system in mind, Halverson would resign from the bench and Hardcastle would step aside as chief judge. Halverson's career is in shambles. Hardcastle has proven she lacks the temperament to lead the court.

    What's more likely?

    It doesn't take much speculating to guess that Halverson will file a federal discrimination lawsuit against Hardcastle and the court system.

    And guess who will end up footing that bill as well?

    You see, that's the most painful part of the cursed Regional Justice Center and the endless laugh track that echoes through its halls.

    In the end, the joke is always on us.

    John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call 383-0295.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    JOhn O'Neil wrote on May 16, 2007 09:12 PM: Oh Judge Halverson...the Great John Smith Hath Spoken...Ye shall be of a mind to resign your position as to do anything less would be a fools errand, so sayeth John smith...knower of the heart, reader of thy mind, and the one true voice of reason ...so sayeth the Lord...so sayeth John Smith...or not.


    Paul wrote on May 14, 2007 06:56 AM: Didn't Hardcastle ban Halverson from the RJC when she filed to run agianst her then husband, Gerald Hardcastle? Looks like Hardcastle is continually trying to get Halverson at of the RJC. Halverson did not and does not stand a chance against Hardcastle who seems determined to poke at Halverson at every oppourunity.

    This does not seem condusive to the behavior of a "Chief Judge".

    Grow up Hardhead.


    Jerry wrote on May 13, 2007 11:04 PM: Didn't the Review Journal publically endorse Elizabeth Halverson, and help her to get elected? Good call!???


    Ben wrote on May 13, 2007 09:51 PM: Let me see if I get this straight...people are accusing the court's chief judge of overreacting when she has buffered her decisions with the input and support of veteran and WELL RESPECTED Judges Bell, Gonzales and Richie?

    Further, the entire court administration is standing behind her decisions?

    AND what about the well documented complaints that piled up against Halverson from staff AND attorneys in just 4 months time?

    All I can say is IF the chief judge, the three judge panel, the court admin, the staff, and local attorneys are indeed conspiring against Halverson and all of these weird stories are indeed nothing more than a personal vendetta, then not only would there be more of the LEGAL COMMUNITY coming to Halverson's defense, but also NO GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS would be agreeing with Hardcastle's actions.

    Nevertheless, John L Smith is absolutely correct...Federal Courts' involvement is just on the horizon!


    Joe Lynch wrote on May 13, 2007 08:52 AM: AH!!, The majesty of justice in southern Nevada!!!


    Bill wrote on May 13, 2007 07:27 AM: This whole drama is a mess.The moment Halverson won, I told my wife, expect some fireworks.

    I knew of the history of these two women.I knew Hardcastle would be like a hound out for blood on Halverson.
    I also knew Halverson would play right in to it and make Hardcastle's job to get her out easy.

    Halverson lacks the experience of the court..she also lacks the experience of how to deal with crafty not so slick politicians like Hardcastle. She is unpolished and naive.

    Hardcastle has proven she lacks the ability to lead the court and be impartial.

    Both these women are out of control and have lost sight of what their jobs are and who put them in these positions. As Smith said...it is us taxpayer who end up footing the bill for this outrageous cat fight.



    Randy wrote on May 13, 2007 02:39 AM: I am an attorney, and I am no fan of Judge Hardcastle. However, I was at the courthouse last week and I spoke to several court personnel who are close to the situation. They are of the opinion that Halverson is completely out of touch and that she has no idea how erratic her behavior is. She is convinced everyone is out to get her, so expect the drama to continue. Good news for the media--bad news for attorneys and for Clark County.