Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

sponsored by
News


JOHN L. SMITH: Banning every incompetent judge just might empty courthouse

The buzz around the Regional Justice Center is that embattled rookie District Judge Elizabeth Halverson might be too unstable and incompetent to run a courtroom.

Between alleged emotional issues and accusations that she's too inexperienced, she's been the subject of intense criticism by Chief Judge Kathy Hardcastle and some of her former courthouse subordinates.


Most Popular Stories
  • Traffic accident claims life of longtime, successful lawyer
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • THE FACES OF JOBLESSNESS: Family had to get help for first time
  • NORM: Buchanan called 'larger than life'
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • NORM: Agassi reveals bad vibes with Shields
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • Hardcastle and Halverson have long been at odds, and the rookie judge blames the chief judge for making her life miserable during her first five months on the bench. Their professional differences have grown very personal, and Hardcastle recently pulled Halverson's criminal cases from her docket.

    Matters appeared to get worse for Halverson on May 10, when Hardcastle tossed a metaphorical stone through her window and banned her from the Regional Justice Center after a bit of courthouse melodrama that included a 911 phone call, the appearance of two personal bodyguards, and the collection of e-mail from the new judge's executive assistant.

    In response, Halverson's attorneys, William Gamage and Dominic Gentile, won an emergency stay of the banishment from the Nevada Supreme Court, which could call for the equivalent of a full civil trial with all evidence and assorted judicial dirty laundry publicly displayed.

    When the attorneys said Hardcastle's decision was "not only without authority but also without precedent," they weren't kidding. Examples are legion of judges botching court business or embarrassing the institution with events in their personal lives and not getting the shove by the chief judge.

    If Halverson is so "incompetent" after just a few months on the bench, what does that make all the other judges whose actions on and off the bench have generated so much embarrassment?

    The list is long and newsprint is expensive, so I will highlight only a few of many.

    Who can forget the late Judge Paul Goldman, a man of formidable legal learning and experience, who threatened to jail an air-conditioning repairman working too loudly?

    If memory serves, Goldman also came close to incarcerating an elderly woman for a similarly invisible violation.

    And there's the late Judge Jeffrey Sobel, another fellow with undeniable experience and intellect, who was caught running his court not in his black robe, but at home in his bathrobe. Sobel was known as a knowledgeable but arrogant fellow who wasn't above ridiculing anyone who came before him.

    In Family Court, there's Judge Steven Jones, who once had his pregnant wife arrested for domestic battery, briefly jailed his daughter, was himself arrested on a domestic violence charge (later dismissed), and insists on keeping company with a felonious ex-brother-in-law.

    Starts to put Halverson's idiotic decision to bring two bodyguards to court into perspective, doesn't it?

    Articles on the Halverson-Hardcastle mud-wrestling contest have certainly embarrassed the court, but that's nothing new. Judge Donald Mosley is among District Court's most experienced veterans, but I'd like to have a dollar for every time I've read a story about one of his angry ex-girlfriends. "One Life to Live" doesn't have that many plot twists and broken hearts.

    As for rookie mistakes, consider the rocky start of District Judge Jessie Walsh. She had so much trouble early in her career that attorneys avoided her courtroom in droves. In 2004, 117 of 433 District Court peremptory challenges were in Walsh's court. Pigpen didn't have that many people avoiding him.

    Back in Family Court, who can forget Hearing Master Sylvia Beller, who ordered a 16-year-old defendant to disrobe because she believed he was wearing a gang-related T-shirt?

    The Judicial Discipline Commission reprimanded Beller, but she wasn't locked out of the courthouse.

    You can fill a CAT bus with all the judges who have exercised questionable judgment in sealing cases for big contributors and well-connected businessmen in this community.

    Only a few reporters put heat on them.

    Does Hardcastle have the right to take away Halverson's criminal cases and lock her out of the courthouse?

    "We feel that those were forms of discipline, and as such fall outside of what is permitted by the Constitution and state law," Gamage said.

    Some form of disciplinary action may be in order for Halverson, but it should be left to the proper authority. And if the voters don't like her, they can remove her from office.

    Start throwing stones around Southern Nevada's justice system, and not many windows will go unbroken.

    John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. E-mail him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call 383-0295.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 5 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    carmela florio wrote on March 11, 2009 11:56 AM: march,2009
    judge jessie walsh is always for the attorney, never for the person who has been trying to defend themselves in her courtroom, she is nasty, and very insesitive to an individual. her only comment that she has when a person is defending themselves, because they cannot afford an attorney is, and i quote your paper work is wrong, and your lucky i will give you the judical review, and i lost the case, once again. what is the judical review all about, i thought finally someone to help an indigent person. not in this judges courtroom


    Report abuse

    Gary L. Zerman wrote on September 18, 2008 02:57 PM: Good column by Mr. Smith. Who's judging the the judges? Apparently no one. Discover or recall that the judges unconstitutionally gave themselves absolute judicial immunity. (See Randall v. Brigham, 74 US 523 (1868), Bradley v. Fisher, 80 US 335 (1872) and Stump v. Sparkman, 435 US 349 (1978).) Mr. Smith though forgot to mention the recent Nevada Supreme Court decision holding that the public censure of Judge George Assad was TOO HARSH, where he had essentially kidnapped a woman in his court; she was the girlfriend of a traffic ticket defendant, who could not appear in court on his hearing date, and she was there simply asking the court for a contuance on her boyfriend's matter. And recall also the 2006 LATimes' 3-part series "Juice v. Junkets", and follow up articles, about widespread unethical (or worse)conduct by several other Las Vegas judges. Empty courthouse? Maybe that was an understatement by Mr. Smith. How about looking at the entire bench?


    Report abuse

    John O'Neill wrote on May 24, 2007 08:31 PM: Two columns ago John L Smith was calling for the step down of Halverson...but MY Voice OF REASON shouted STOP!

    I was right. I am right. Smith is usually wrong...Except this time, but he stole my idea...I am the impetuous for all that is right that spews from this man.


    Report abuse

    Withheld wrote on May 20, 2007 08:31 AM: Judge Jessie Walsh is still one of the biggest embarrassements to any judicial system. She has no concept of justice and equal treatment of the litigants. You can tell in teh first 5 minutes in her court which way she will rule. she prejudices every decision I've watched her make. She is completely incompetent and I totally understand why no one would want to be in her courtroom.


    Report abuse

    Michelle wrote on May 20, 2007 04:33 AM: The public doesn't care what Ms. Hardcastle thinks of Judge Halvorsen. She was elected by the people of this state, and the rest of the employees of the court should remember that it is the public that pays their salaries, too.

    Stop fighting amongst yourselves and get to work doing what you are being paid to do.