Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

News


SIX PROJECTS EXEMPTED: Senate OKs lower 'green' tax breaks

Measure must return to the Assembly

CARSON CITY -- It wasn't a win for Wynn on Friday, with the Senate passing 20-1 a bill restricting generous tax breaks for companies building environmentally friendly projects.

The bill goes back to the Assembly, where changes made by the Senate will have to be reconciled before the measure can go to the governor for his possible signature.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Cheetah Girls have claws out
  • NORM: Chef's steak rates No. 1 in magazine
  • NORM: Woods in town for trainer aid
  • NORM: O.J. associate has advertising plans
  • Teen's death leaves family devastated
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ALLEGED: Halverson husband arrested
  • Jewelry theft from Mayweather major LV haul
  • Jailed criminals reach out to give teens inside look at 'Life of Crime'
  • FATAL ARGUMENT: Woman dies after stabbing
  • BOULDER CITY BYPASS: Bridging funding gap



  • Assembly Bill 621 passed with a Thursday amendment intact, despite an e-mail sent to senators on Friday from Matt Maddox of Wynn Resorts objecting to the measure.

    "The new amendment to AB621 will have a serious adverse pact on the Encore project for Wynn Resorts," Maddox said.

    The imposition of a Feb. 1, 2007, deadline for projects to qualify for the original sales tax breaks included in legislation passed in 2005, "will exclude Wynn and cause us to lose millions of dollars and abandon many of the energy saving initiatives," he said.

    An analysis of the Wynn project suggests that if the company qualified, it would collect about $30 million in sales tax breaks.

    Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno, acknowledged the Wynn project would not meet the deadline in the bill as amended by the Senate and so would not qualify for the sales tax exemption under the 2005 legislation.

    The new measure eliminates the sales tax exemption for all but six projects, identified by Townsend as the CityCenter project being built by MGM/Mirage; Fontainebleau; the Venetian's Lido/Palazzo Resort projects; the Molasky Corporate Center; the Echelon Place project by Boyd Gaming; and the Panorama Towers project. All are in Las Vegas.

    Lawmakers sought to revise the 2005 bill after learning that it would result in more than $900 million in sales and property tax breaks, reducing funding for local government and public schools.



    Leave Your Comment 1 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    CAS127 wrote on June 02, 2007 07:26 AM: What "activist" government hath wrought - the utter destruction of the "Equal Protection" principle of American law.

    Welcome, Nevada, to the logical, terminal conclusion of the welfare state - the Government's inalienable right to take money from one party and simply give it to another (the more politically powerful party).

    A tax break is an expenditure of public funds as much as a direct grant. And the wrangling around the Green Tax Break has illustrated that NV is simply a place where the political strong will take from the political weak.

    And they have every intention of continuing to do so.

    Our casino overlords having rather effortlessly succeeded in this case, why should we believe that the day in which we will be ordered to pay funds directly to the MegaCasinos be that far off?