Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


Appeals court orders new trial

California man accused of traveling to Las Vegas to have sex with 14-year-old girl

A federal appeals court has granted a new trial to a California man convicted of traveling to Las Vegas with the intent to have sex with a 14-year-old girl.

Kevin Curtin, then 43, of Anaheim, Calif., was convicted in 2004 of one count of traveling across state lines with the intent to engage in a sexual act with a minor and one count of using an interstate facility to attempt to persuade a minor to engage in sexual acts.


Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Terry Fator, wife ending marriage
  • NORM: Blaze breaks out during magic act
  • NORM: Jackson worked on album at Palms
  • Ex-Ensign aide details wife's affair
  • NORM: Jacksons set up LV memorial area
  • SENATOR'S AFFAIR: Hamptons given $96,000 in gifts
  • LV area residential real estate sales reach record in June
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • Official: Fatal gunshot in back




  • A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco first reversed the convictions in 2006, but a 15-member panel later reviewed the opinion. The larger panel, which included Judge Jay Bybee of Nevada, issued an opinion last month that again reversed the convictions and granted Curtin a new trial.

    Curtin's attorney, Cal Potter III, argued that U.S. District Judge Robert Jones erred when he allowed prosecutors to present evidence at trial about lewd stories Curtin had in his possession when he was arrested. The stories described sexual acts between adults and children.

    "They were actually trying him for his character rather than the crime that was alleged," Potter said.

    Potter said his client had a First Amendment right to possess the lawful reading material, and he argued that jurors were prejudiced by the evidence.

    According to the recent opinion, Jones "properly required the prosecution to demonstrate the evidence's connection to the crime with which Curtin was charged."

    "Having determined that the evidence was relevant to show intent, the District Court's remaining responsibility was carefully to limit the evidence ... to ensure that the evidence's potentially prejudicial effect did not substantially outweigh its probative value," according to the opinion. "Here, the court's discretion was not properly exercised."

    Steve Myhre, Nevada's acting U.S. attorney, said prosecutors have no plans to appeal the ruling.

    "We actually view that decision as a victory for our office, because prior to that the court had, on First Amendment grounds, categorically excluded evidence of this nature to prove the intent of an individual to cross state lines to have sex with a minor," he said.

    Myhre said prosecutors plan to introduce the same evidence at a retrial.

    "There's nothing in this decision that precludes us from offering that evidence," he said.

    Curtin participated in Internet chats in February 2004 with a Las Vegas police officer posing as a 14-year-old girl. Authorities said Curtin asked the girl about her sexual urges and wanted to know whether she would attend a Penn & Teller show with him at the Rio.

    He then arranged to meet the girl in a casino bowling alley, authorities said. Law enforcement officials arrested the suspect outside the casino.

    Potter said Curtin, a magician, has served 40 months of a five-year prison sentence. He remains in custody.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Shelley wrote on June 03, 2007 06:56 PM: I would really love to know who sits on this 9th Circuit court of appeals.


    nothinbutthetruth wrote on June 03, 2007 09:30 AM: DIE IN PRISON, PERVERT!