Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

sponsored by
News


PUMPING PROJECT: Little fish entangles water plan

Groups warn of threat to species

A small fish that swims in a half-dozen spring-fed ponds and marshes in Utah should be protected from a plan by the Southern Nevada Water Authority to pump groundwater "for runaway growth in Las Vegas," conservation groups said Wednesday.

The water authority maintains that it can preserve the species and pump the groundwater responsibly.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • ANOTHER SOMBER DAY: Fourth officer in short span dies
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • The conservation groups and the Confederate Tribes of the Goshute Reservation filed a petition with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the shiny, 2 1/2-inch-long least chub for protection as a threatened or endangered species.

    They cited the water authority's plans to pump up to 30,000 acre-feet of groundwater per year from Snake Valley, which straddles the Utah border in central Nevada.

    "Of great concern for this species is future water withdrawals from the Snake Valley aquifer that are currently proposed to support human population growth in Southern Nevada," reads the 58-page petition by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Great Basin Chapter of Trout Unlimited, the tribes and the Sierra Club's Utah Chapter.

    In a statement Wednesday, they said the least chub "has been reduced to just six fragile wild populations, three of which occur in the Snake Valley, where planned pumping of water for runaway growth in Las Vegas is a serious threat to the tiny fish's survival."

    The petition describes other factors affecting the least chub, including non-native mosquito fish, livestock grazing and farming. But the greatest concern is the water authority's proposal to drill nine pumping stations in Snake Valley.

    "The best science available so far tells us that groundwater withdrawal proposed in Snake Valley could potentially cause significant drawdown of the Snake Valley water table, with repercussions for all aquatic species and wetland systems that rely on consistent spring discharge," the petition reads.

    "Repercussions in this case for the least chub could be catastrophic."

    A spokesman for the Southern Nevada Water Authority said his agency's record for protecting species and the environment will prevail in persuading the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that the least chub's survival won't be impacted by groundwater pumping.

    "The short answer is that there are already safeguards because of our agreement with federal agencies prior to pumping that should be able to protect that species," said the spokesman, J.C. Davis.

    "Our commitment has been to protect that and other species, and that's what we're going to do," he said. "It shouldn't affect the viability of developing groundwater in Snake Valley. We have always developed water resources in an environmentally responsible manner.

    "We have an awfully good track record for environmental stewardship," Davis said.

    He said the water authority is "years away from pumping." In the meantime, safeguards to ensure monitoring and certain flow rates in the Snake Valley will become part of the Bureau of Land Management's environmental impact statement for the project.

    In addition to Snake Valley, Davis said the impact statement will cover planned groundwater pumping in Spring Valley, Cave Valley, Dry Lake Valley and Delamar Valley.

    Even if the least chub becomes listed for protection under the Endangered Species Act, Davis said the water authority would work out preservation measures through consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

    "At the end of the day, development of these groundwater sources and preservation of wildlife species are not mutually exclusive," he said.

    Noah Greenwald, conservation biologist for the Center for Biological Diversity in Portland, Ore., said the petition should be a wake-up call for authorities in the Las Vegas Valley that they need to practice additional conservation measures and set limits on urban growth.

    "At what point does Las Vegas stop sucking up water from other places?" he asked. "How far will Las Vegas go to get water to keep growing?"

    "We hope the petition will make them seriously consider the wisdom of groundwater pumping from the area," Greenwald said.

    Davis said the idea behind pumping groundwater in White Pine County is not so much to increase growth in the Las Vegas Valley but to ensure that the existing population will have a backup water supply should the drought continue along the Colorado River.

    "The groundwater project is as much about protecting the people who live here now as it is about developing water supplies for the future," he said.

    The amount proposed for pumping from Snake Valley, up to 30,000 acre-feet, is enough to support 60,000 homes, not counting what are known as return-flow credits, or the amount of treated wastewater returned to Lake Mead from use of that water.

    Conservation measures targeting water used for the urban landscape have been effective, he noted. From 2002 to 2006, the valley's population increased by 330,000, but water consumption decreased by 18 billion gallons.

    The gain was made by water agencies convincing customers to use less water on landscaping and getting credit for returning more treated wastewater to Lake Mead.

    Don Duff, a former federal fisheries biologist and president of the Great Basin Chapter of Trout Unlimited, said the least chub is a cold-water species left over from ancient Lake Bonneville as it dried up thousands of years ago.

    He said he fears groundwater pumping in Snake Valley will compound the effects that today's drought is having on springs vital to the chub's habitat.

    Massive pumping proposed by the water authority, he said, could lower the Snake Valley aquifer by 40 feet to 50 feet between the first and second decade after pumping begins.

    As it stands, stream flows at 2 cubic feet per second to 10 cubic feet per second are three times less than they should be this time of year.

    "It's getting to be pretty critical from a scientific standpoint," he said by telephone from Salt Lake City. "The risk in the future is that groundwater pumping could draw down that aquifer so that all the springs go dry and the wild populations are lost."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 6 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Sean wrote on June 22, 2007 09:09 AM: Why does the LV press continue to echo SNWA's misrepresentation of the cost of the pipeline at $2 billion? And when will the LV press do a story on the BARCASS report that painted a picture of Owens Valley for rural NV if this deal goes through?


    DJ wrote on June 21, 2007 02:00 PM: It's frightening to me to see the arrogance and power of this public utility. Who do they think they are to be the ones to decide that urban uses of water have greater value than rural uses of water? Why do man-made lakes, housing developments, water attractions, and golf-courses take precedence over crop irrigation, the watering of livestock and wildlife, or freeflowing springs and streams?

    Las Vegas needs to learn to manage it's limited resources, to tighten it's belt, instead of simply forcefully transfering limited resources from the posession of those who lack clout to the posession of those who have it.

    And, the idea of a "nature park" is ridiculous. Imagine the costs of trying to duplicate the delicate balances of nature found at these pools. And who'd be funding this half-reared effort to "make it all better"? Why, the Average Joe Water-user, of course. And would this "park" be self-sustaining and self-perpetuating? Of course not, it would eventually require it's own panel of specialized caretakers for never-ending management. Not only that, but once it's been declared a state treasure, we should all see the necessity of adding a small monetary amount in addition to our regularly inflated water payment to the "park"s special "preservation" fund.

    The whole deal reeks of a blatant, out-of-control invasion of and confiscation of the resources of a politically weak county for the voracious consumption of a relative super-power. That's not fair or right under any scenerio.


    Ken Hill wrote on June 21, 2007 11:48 AM: SNWA's JC Davis indicates the pipeline into rural Nevada is for Colorado River drought back up.

    SNWA spokespeople never mention that Spring Valley and Snake Valley also have endured drought every bit as severe as that affecting the Colorado River. Do they think there is some kind of border separating southern Nevada from northern Nevada and western Utah -- with drought south of the line and rain forests north of the line?

    Springs in Snake Valley already are dried from drought and the minor levels of local agricultural pumping.

    Ken Hill
    Snake Valley, Utah


    Kathryn Hill wrote on June 21, 2007 11:43 AM: An SNWA spokesman claims they have a great track record for protecting species and the environment. But they revealed during the State Engineer's Spring Valley hearing that their idea of protecting species and the environment was to dry up existing ponds and provide a "nature park" on one of their newly acquired ranches. Frankly, I'm not interested in making a field trip to an SNWA themepark to see the carcass of Snake Valley's environment.


    Marc D wrote on June 21, 2007 11:33 AM: there are cheaper options than this water grab that the water authority is chasing, the price of Desalination has been falling for the last few years and they have developed new filtration systems that can now get fresh water at a one to one ratio which is far better than the 100 gals of sea water to get 40 gals of clean water.
    These plants are already being built in SoCal and in other countries like Australia, the cost has become as cheap as the high end cost of dam water.


    Aaron wrote on June 21, 2007 03:44 AM: Possible endangered species aside, when does the excessive growth in the Las Vegas valley stop? If the SNWA builds that $2 billion pipeline, what makes ANYONE think that they'll slow or discontinue pumping when the rural counties' water tables drop? The SNWA will need to pay for that pipeline so they'll either continue pumping or expect a HUGE water rate increase. Either way, the SNWA is going to continue pumping water to support the developers in Las Vegas allowing them to continue building homes. This will happen whether there's sufficient water or not.