Home subscribe manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed

News


More Nevada politicians lining up behind Clinton

Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign says it will announce another batch of endorsements from Nevada elected officials today.

If it seems like you've read this story before, it's because Clinton's Nevada campaign is racking up practically all the endorsements of prominent Democrats, from state officers to county commissioners to legislators to city council members.

Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

Most Popular Stories
  • NORM: Phelps galpal gets exposure on Web
  • NORM: Robin Gibb in airport standoff
  • DOUG ELFMAN: Comedian says his arrest a joke
  • NORM: Web site shows life of Mazzeo
  • NORM: Knievel will try jump at Mirage
  • NORM: Wynn coveted cathedral's land
  • Las Vegas police use saturation strategy to cool 'hot spots' of crime
  • FATAL MAULING: Trigger for attack possibly food
  • Judge absolves juror who contacted killer
  • Mesquite casino to close temporarily



  • Coming on board today will be Las Vegas City Councilman Ricki Barlow, North Las Vegas City Councilwoman Stephanie Smith and Dennis Keating, president of the Nye County School Board.

    They follow a trail blazed by Clark County Commissioner Rory Reid and since trodden by such Democratic notables as former Attorney General Frankie Sue Del Papa, former Gov. Bob Miller, state Sen. Dina Titus, Clark County Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani, state Treasurer Kate Marshall and long lists of business leaders and activists in the Hispanic, black and Asian communities.

    The other campaigns say they aren't concerned by Clinton's domination of the endorsement field, although they all have tried and failed to get many of the same endorsements. They say they will compete by having a strong, if not star-studded, grass-roots effort.

    But analysts and insiders say Clinton has worked harder and faster than other Democratic candidates to put together a formidable organization in Nevada, and the others could have a hard time cutting into her double-digit lead in polls here as a result.

    "Nevada is clearly in her column, more so than any other early state," said University of Nevada, Reno political scientist Eric Herzik. "She's behind in Iowa, she's running even in New Hampshire, and she's behind in South Carolina."

    More than the other candidates, Clinton appears to have seen the opportunity offered by Nevada's first-time spot on the early calendar and swooped in to monopolize the big names. And it's the people who pay attention to those names who are most likely to show up to January's caucuses, Herzik said.

    "Because it's Nevada's fist time, those inside party activists are more important," he said. "They'll show up, and they have a stake in how this unfolds. Hillary got here early, she got organized early, and the others are just getting started."

    It is still early, with six months before Nevada votes. As ABC News' Rick Klein quipped recently, "Nobody's really eliminated in July, except maybe the Nationals," Washington, D.C.'s basement-dwelling baseball team.

    That's true here; the race isn't over in Nevada, Herzik said. But every name that goes into Clinton's column is one that doesn't go into another candidate's.

    "This is a state where it always helps, regardless of party, to be connected to the powerful people on the inside," he said.

    Reid said Clinton's different endorsers all have unique constituencies that they have promised to work to bring on board. "We're not seeking these endorsements so we can put out a press release every once in a while," he said. "These people each have an existing network of supporters who will serve our field operations."

    Barlow, for example, recently won election to the Las Vegas City Council after serving as ward liaison for his predecessor, Lawrence Weekly. "That was my job, building bridges with the community," he said. "I bring my experience in the community to the campaign. I have influence in a variety of areas, the ability to pick up the phone and get things moving when roadblocks occur."

    Barlow, who is black, said he was courted by all the other Democratic campaigns except Barack Obama's. "I like what he has to say, but his office never reached out to me, and as far as track record, Hillary has it, hands down," he said. "Race has nothing to do with it."

    Smith, a one-term assemblywoman before joining the North Las Vegas City Council in 1997, said she got calls from the campaigns of Obama, John Edwards, Bill Richardson and Joe Biden, and "waited quite a while to make a decision because I wanted to feel good about who I chose. I wish everybody well, but I really believe it is time for her."

    Keating, who lives in Pahrump, said he hopes to get Clinton's message to rural voters. "I've started to network in Pahrump and Nye County already," he said.

    The other campaigns profess indifference and deny that there's any sour grapes.

    "We're not concerned about getting the names; we're concerned about getting people to do work on the ground," said Adam Bozzi, Nevada spokesman for Edwards. "Obviously, we would like the support of as many prominent elected officials as possible, but it's the people on the ground who will help us win a caucus."

    Edwards has the only non-Clinton endorsement of a Nevada elected official, that of freshman Assemblyman Richard "Tick" Segerblom.

    Bozzi said Edwards is in no way ceding Nevada to Clinton. "John Edwards has a four-state strategy, and Nevada is a large part of that," Bozzi said. "You'll see him here a lot more."

    The Obama campaign professes to be a different kind of campaign, one that is bringing new people into politics with the candidate's refreshing approach and thus circumventing the old machines. It made that point dramatically this week with the announcement that since January, 258,000 people have contributed to the campaign. It's not yet known how many of those donors are in Nevada.

    "This campaign is not just about endorsements," Chicago-based spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. "It's about getting Barack Obama's message out to people who are going to go out and caucus for Barack Obama."

    Richardson, who has spent the most time in Nevada, also is counting on the hoi polloi, Nevada spokesman Josh McNeil said. "On Jan. 19, 2008, the voters of this state will decide who wins the Nevada caucus," he said. "The Richardson campaign is committed to reaching out to each of those voters individually."

    An aide to one of the rival campaigns, who spoke anonymously, said most of Clinton's endorsements come from her pre-existing political machine, the vast network of contacts created when her husband was president.

    Many uncommitted Democrats say they are contacted constantly by the Clinton campaign. A Democratic party official, also speaking anonymously, said Reid in particular has exerted his influence.

    While some see that as strong-arming, especially because Reid is chairman of the powerful County Commission and his father, Democratic Sen. Harry Reid, is the most powerful man in the U.S. Senate, it's also a matter of simply outworking the others.

    "They have courted all these people like a drunken teenager. People are getting call after call with opportunities to join committees and other promises," the official said.

    At a recent party Central Committee meeting in Elko, all the candidates sent representatives. But Clinton sent a personalized video in which she mentioned many party insiders and staffers by name.

    "People were standing there with their mouths open," the official said.

    "They couldn't believe Hillary Clinton said their name. They all wanted copies of the video."

    A prominent Democratic insider who hasn't endorsed a candidate said some of the national campaigns were leery of committing too many resources to Nevada's first-time caucus effort if Clinton already has it sown up.

    That, the insider said, could hurt the credibility of the new effort and diminish its significance in early-state momentum.

    "In D.C., they think it (Nevada) is hers to lose, so they are not paying as much attention to Nevada as they could be."



    Leave Your Comment 12 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Terrence wrote on October 28, 2007 07:13 PM: What qualifies Hilary Clinton to be President? Other than being an enabler of the biggest scamp who ever served in the White House. Other than a raw grab for more power.She is so far to the Left the country will sink into the Pacific if she stays to long in the West. Anyone who heard her speak in Las Vegas recently heard her wailing and screaching like scalded dog by hot water. Like a maniac. She was totaly off the charts. In this great country of ours we can do much ,much better than Hilary.


    Joe T. wrote on August 31, 2007 07:49 PM: Frankly, RJ, I don't give a damn. Who cares what politicians are endorsing Hillary, or for that matter any candidate? While I favor either John Edwards or Barack Obama over Hillary, I find this parade of politicians and political hacks being trotted out for their endorsements to be a tiresome relic of oldtime "machine" politics that should definitely be scrapped, and would be, if the rank-and-file had any clout in the Nevada Democratic Party. The fact that a local or state politician endorses a presidential candidate does not make me one iota more likely to vote for that presidential candidate. All it does is feed the egos of all the politicians involved -- something that politicians have become expert at, over the years.


    NVMojo wrote on July 05, 2007 10:50 PM: NO MORE PRESIDENTIAL FAMILY RERUNS! Especially dyNASTY families!


    hanna wrote on July 05, 2007 09:26 PM: Hillary's establishment campaign will be defeated by Obama's grassroots campaign which has orchestrated the registration of thousands of new voters.

    As for Ricky Barlow, why would anyone want to associate their campaign with a known wife-beater?


    Sam5 wrote on July 05, 2007 05:43 PM: Hillary is the most qualified candidate because she is married to Bill Clinton. Bill has made clear between the lines that he is returning to the White House not to be the "first spouse" but to be the leader that we need! I hope Sen. Obama accepts the VP spot and Clinton/Obama will be an unbeatable ticket against the obvious Mitt Romney republican nominee. Romney for sure will win the south and intermountain west - but Clinton/Obama (ala GW Bush) have the electoral college locked up! Fot those who are troubled by Bill's sex life - so what! I'd rather have sex scandal headlines over the Bush body count from Iraq.


    Ray wrote on July 05, 2007 03:13 PM: Not so fast! We're just getting started. Sen. Barack Obama, once everyone has had a chance to hear him speak, will be the obvious choice for Nevada. We don't need the Clinton's moving back into the White House again, not that Hillary is even remotely electable! Obama is a straight-shooter and America needs him. Obama '08!


    Ted DeCorte wrote on July 05, 2007 02:05 PM: As a Democrat, I REALLY want to be able to support Hillary. Hillary is as qualified as any of the contenders - Republican or Democrat, and she knows her way around the Beltway. I am though not convinced that she is a "bridge builder" or a "healer" for our nation's deep political and social wounds. America desperately needs leadership for ALL the people, not just those who believe in a particular "righteous cause". America cannot afford another "polarizer". We must begin to find common ground of community and nation, becoming not a "house divided", but a "house united". Hillary, are you the one to lead all Americans or just the ones who support your cause? Hillary, can you lead a nation of immigrants, people of varied ethnic backgrounds and races, of varied religious and non-religious vents, of liberatian, conservative, moderate and liberal ideals, of patriot or pacifist? That's the leadership America needs now.


    RANDY wrote on July 05, 2007 12:54 PM: WHAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND IS WHY HER? AS A SENATOR, SHE HAS DONE VERY LITTLE. HER RECORD SPEAKS FOR IT SELF. HER HUSBAND CAN BE BLAMED FOR ALL THAT HAS GONE WRONG ON THE WAR ON TERROR PRE-911. HE RAISED TAXES. FOR 8 YEARS, HE COULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING ABOUT OUR ENERGY NEEDS.WE MIGHT HAVE BEEN LESS DEPENDANT ON FOREIGN OIL. HE DID NOTHING ABOUT BOARDER SECURITY. DID NOTHING ABOUT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. NAFTA WAS A COMPLETE FAILURE. ALL OF THE WILD FIRES IN THE WEST, ARE A RESULT OF HIS POLICY'S ON PUBLIC LANDS. HIS POLICY OF CLOSING ACCESS ROADS AND LIMITING RANCHERS FROM GRASSING THEIR CATTLE WAS DONE ON HIS WATCH. SO,DO YOU REALLY WANT TO HAVE ANOTHER CLINTON IN THE WHITE HOUSE?


    gp wrote on July 05, 2007 12:07 PM: Yeah,lining up behind her to kiss her rear.


    Bruce wrote on July 05, 2007 11:44 AM: I hope the liberals spend millions to get hillary nomenated.I don't she electable 60% of America think she's a terrable person.She might be the only hope for repubiicans.Thay too are bad ,but hillary makes them look a lot better.


    Read All Comments