Home Subscribe Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

News
Jul. 26, 2007
Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

Gibbons' stance on Yucca perplexing

Lawmakers say caving on water issues is not good

By STEVE TETREAULT
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU

WASHINGTON -- Consensus eluded Nevada lawmakers  Wednesday on how or whether to respond to unorthodox Yucca Mountain strategy moves that Gov. Jim Gibbons has taken this month.

For the most part, the state's five members of Congress try to stay on the same page as elected state leaders in Carson City when it comes to the proposed nuclear waste repository.

Following a short delegation meeting, the federal representatives again stressed their opposition to the project. But as to the governor's strategy, they were scattered in their responses.

Rep. Jon Porter, R-Nev., said Gibbons should be given the benefit of the doubt after he proposed that the Department of Energy be allowed to extract water at the Yucca site for an additional 30 days even though he concluded DOE had violated of a state order prohibiting the drilling.

Most Popular Stories
  • LANDLORD: AS TENANT, FLEISS FOR THE BIRDS
  • NORM: So, that's why it's titled 'Mindfreak'
  • 1958 CRASH: DEATH IN DESERT AIR
  • CALICO BASIN: Tranquillity lost
  • NORM: Daughters say Barrier left sign
  • NORM: 'Idol' contestant set to go country
  • NORM: Reid book reveals 'Casino' mystery
  • NORM: Jackson in action possibly in Vegas
  • NORM: Cruise the object of a twin crush
  • Durango teacher accused of sex acts with student



    • The governor has not explained his decision, which seemed at odds with Nevada's customary approach that takes the hardest line possible in efforts to kill the Yucca project.

    Gibbons' decision reportedly was made against the advice of state Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto and of Bob Loux, the director of the Agency for Nuclear Projects.

    Sen. Harry Reid and Shelley Berkley, both D-Nev., were critical of the decision at the time, while Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., said he didn't understand it.

    Reid called it "the biggest gift DOE has received since I have been in Washington."

    Former Sen. Richard Bryan on Friday called for a meeting between the governor and the congressional group to air out the matter and reunite state leaders. Otherwise, Bryan said, he feared Nevada's resolve against the repository would be questioned.

    It did not appear such a meeting would occur soon, judging from lawmakers' comments on Wednesday.

    Talking with reporters as the lawmakers sat in Reid's office, Porter said Gibbons has fought Yucca Mountain "his whole career. He may be privy to information in that particular situation with his legal counsel."

    "Time will tell but I think we should give him the benefit," Porter said.

    "Well, you give him the benefit," Reid told Porter.

    "This was the first negative thing I have ever said about Jim Gibbons," Reid added, referring to his criticism of the governor's water decision.

    "I thought it was the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of, and it set us back a long way," Berkley said. "All I know is that his decision makes it difficult for us to do our jobs" against Yucca.

    Ensign said the issue may be "water under the bridge at this point."

    He noted that the Energy Department rejected Gibbons' offer in favor of seeking broader water rights, and the matter was headed to the courts.

    Ensign said leaders were re-emphasizing their opposition to the repository to send a message the state intends to continue fighting the project.

    Rep. Dean Heller, R-Nev., did not take part in the exchange.

    Gibbons' spokeswoman could not be reached Wednesday night by phone or e-mail.

    Links powered by inform.com


    Leave Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Kevin wrote on July 26, 2007 06:20 PM: I don't see why everyone is perplexed. Gibbons was a Republican Congressman and has many ties that our other recent governors have not had. Dubya and Big Energy are calling in their markers.
    But then, does Reid really think 30 days of water is "the biggest gift DOE has received since I have been in Washington?" C'mon, Harry, don't BS me.
    "It set us back a long way," Berkley said. This is also a crock.
    And, where in the Heller is Dean? We haven't heard a peep from this guy since his acceptance speech.
    The only problem with nuclear power is the waste. Do we think it's safer sitting in open ponds?


    Verton Crupwick III wrote on July 26, 2007 04:25 PM: Um, this "rational look" requires the belief that this deadly stuff can be stored safely into a far-flung, indefinite future that can span hundreds of thousands of years. Hmmm...that "rationality" sounds more like faith to me.
    Then again, I always DID think the nuke-power apologists sounded oddly like religious fundamentalists...


    Post wrote on July 26, 2007 03:44 PM: Kim T. needs to stop saying "WE".


    Jason wrote on July 26, 2007 01:23 PM: Teddy, you are in the minority. Yucca is based on bad science and kickbacks from the nuke industry. Many facts have been ignored and political criminals have attemted to rush it through while ignoring obvious safety issues. Yucca is dead because of the greed that has ignored the dangers to our state.

    As for Gibbons, we need to put that sex ofender in a padded cel...


    Ted wrote on July 26, 2007 08:39 AM: Kim T. doesn't speak for me. Any rational look at the situation shows that the material can be handled and stored safely.

    We need electricity that doesn't pollute the atmosphere. If we can put the leftovers in a mountain rather than in my lungs, I'm all for it.

    Even better if the leftovers are worth billions if we ever start recycling it.


    ra wrote on July 26, 2007 08:07 AM: bush wants yucca and gibbons is a team player,say no more


    Kim T. wrote on July 26, 2007 07:20 AM: I hope all of you who voted for this guy are happy. What a STUPID decision. Gov. Gibbons - figure it out - we don't want that nuclear garbage in Nevada!