Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - News

Friday
Mar 19, 2010
Partly Cloudy
Partly Cloudy 56° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

sponsored by
News


CLEAN ENERGY SUMMIT: Reid opposes coal-fired power plants

Senate majority leader says sun is an untapped resource for the Silver State

RENO -- Sen. Harry Reid said Saturday he will do everything he can to stop construction of new coal-fired power plants proposed for Nevada.

Utility companies, Reid said, should instead invest their billions in solar, wind and geothermal power.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Police seize items at Hells Angels clubhouse
  2. Rhodes rides again at Red Rock
  3. 'Phantom' made it to Final Four
  4. Student arrested for bringing gun to school
  5. Tea Party activists say candidate uninvited
  6. Wal-Mart probing racist NJ store announcement
  7. Testing scandal ensnarls Agassi principal
  8. Northern Iowa guard's 25-foot 3-pointer KOs Rebels
  9. Northern Iowa guard's 25-foot 3-pointer KOs Rebels
  10. Republicans subpoenaed in Ensign probe

  • Brazen Conn. warehouse heist nets $75M in pills



  • Speaking at the first Nevada Clean Energy Summit in Reno, Reid, D-Nev., said the coal-fired plants proposed for eastern Nevada would foul the air and lead to higher costs in terms of health problems for children and the elderly than they would save by using the cheaper fossil fuel to generate electricity.

    "I'm going to do everything I can to stop these plants," he said. "There is no clean coal technology. There is cleaner coal technology, but there is no clean coal technology."

    The summit brought together about 600 elected officials, power company executives and developers and users of green energy technology for a wide-ranging discussion on alternative energy.

    Reid, the Senate majority leader, said Nevada is wasting its sunlight, wind and geothermal resources every day and that the time is now to take advantage of these energy options.

    "Fifty percent of the power comes from outside the state of Nevada, even though we have fuel shining on us every day: the sun," he said.

    Michael Yackira, chief executive officer of Reno-based Sierra Pacific Resources, the company that has proposed building one of the plants, said in comments to the group that the utility is strongly committed to alternative energy sources. The company wants to build the coal-fired $3.7 billion Ely Energy Center, which would generate 1,500 megawatts of electricity.

    "Overall, we expect that more than $2 billion will be invested by us and others to more than triple our renewable energy supplies by 2015," he said.

    Over the past year, the company has signed nine contracts for approximately 300 megawatts of geothermal and solar energy to be produced in Nevada, Yackira said.

    But the company needs a diversified portfolio of energy sources, and fossil-fuel power plants are part of that mix, he said.

    Yackira said the company is developing improved technology to make coal plants more efficient. Testing is under way at the company's Valmy Power Station in Northern Nevada.

    Asked after his remarks to react to Reid, Yackira said building the company's new coal plant will help the environment by allowing it to shut down less efficient facilities.

    "What we are going to be building is the cleanest coal plant in the world," he said.

    While Nevada's alternative energy resources continue to go untapped, the state still leads the way in many areas of alternative energy development and use, according to data provided at the summit:

    • Nevada is No. 1 in geothermal energy use per capita in the nation, generating 110 watts per person compared to California, which produces less than 70 watts per capita.

    • Nevada will be No. 1 in solar energy production per capita in the nation by the end of this year with projects now under way, generating 33 watts per person compared to California, which produces 18 watts per person.

    • The Nevada Legislature in 2007 modified, but continued providing, property tax breaks for "green construction" designed to use less energy. One of those green projects is the MGM Mirage's $7.4 billion CityCenter, a 76-acre mixed-use development on the Strip. CityCenter is the largest privately financed real estate project in the nation. It will include its own energy-efficient power plant and a people mover.

    Reid said the coal-fired plants proposed for White Pine County would pollute the air over Great Basin National Park and other parks and wild areas of Utah.

    It was a "matter of conscience" to oppose the plants, which Reid said he would have opposed anywhere in the United States. If Nevada's utility companies need a "bridge" between old technology and clean energy, they should build more environmentally friendly natural gas plants to produce electricity until alternative sources can be developed, he said.

    Reid said global warming is a reality, and just one of the proposed coal-fired plants would contribute to it by burning seven million tons of coal a year.

    In addition to the plant proposed by Sierra Pacific Resources, the others are being pursued by Sithe Global Power of New York, LS Power of New Jersey and Dynegy of Texas. Sierra Pacific and Sithe Global have separate projects while LS Power and Dynegy are developing the third project. Two are in White Pine County and one is near Mesquite.

    Gov. Jim Gibbons has expressed support for the plant construction.

    Reid said he has not spoken to the Republican governor about the projects and that Gibbons is entitled to his views.

    But if White Pine and other rural counties really want economic development, they should seek alternative energy projects, which have been shown to create jobs, he said.

    Information provided at the summit suggests there is huge potential for alternative energy development in Nevada.

    There is currently 550 megawatts of geothermal energy under development in Nevada, with the potential for up to 1,500 megawatts total.

    Nevada also has more than 24 million acres of land within 10 miles of existing transmission lines classified as "good" to "outstanding" for wind-energy development.

    If environmentally sensitive lands and lands with conflicting use were excluded, the state could still generate 63 million megawatt hours, 280 percent of the entire state's current consumption.

    Other speakers included Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, who said the state must also focus on reducing energy consumption in addition to alternative energy development.

    "Nevada has the highest per capita electric consumption in the West," she said. "Controlling consumption by reducing demand has to be a central part of Nevada's energy policy. The cheapest and cleanest watt is the one that we never have to produce."

    Lt. Gov. Brian Krolicki also spoke, saying the state is committed to alternative energy development and providing any assistance it can.

    "It's going to be good business being green," he said.

    The summit was presented by the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada, the Nevada Development Authority and the Nevada Center for Entrepreneurship and Technology.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Did You Know wrote on August 22, 2007 08:40 PM: Pinky, or Sen. Harry doesn't want a coal plant in Nevada because of the alleged pollution that will blow into his mothershipland, Utah. The reason he isn't opposed to the new coal plants in his mothershipland of Utah is because that alleged pollution gets blown into infidellands of Wyoming and Colorado.


    Report abuse

    Dear Anthony wrote on August 22, 2007 08:34 PM: Your information is incorrect. Solar TWO, not Solar One, used salts to store heat in order to generate electricity "deep into the night." Notice, it doesn't say ALL NIGHT. By the way, Solar Two apparently wasn't too successful as it was converted to a deep space gamma ray telescope. So, it's not generating any electricity.

    I guess it's now looking for Klingons around Uranus. Help it out. Bend over.


    Report abuse

    scott wrote on August 20, 2007 02:56 PM: Sen. Reid is no longer (if he ever was) looking out for the welfare of Nevadans. He would increase our energy costs and disallow badly needed economic development in White Pine county, while pandering to the loony left in this country. Cleaner coal technology uses the most abundant energy source we have, mastering the technical details behind clean coal, which will eventually include gasification would be in the State’s and the country's best interest. Reid should stay out of the power business, or any other business for that matter - his only concern is political calculation.


    Report abuse

    Mike D. wrote on August 19, 2007 07:15 PM: It is rediculous how these so called Government officials can speak against other forms of energy , but then whenever Nevada Power wants to fix the power rates thorugh its system of telling the PUC it wants a raise and getting it handed to them they never speak up for the people they are supposed to be serving.


    Report abuse

    GOD wrote on August 19, 2007 05:54 PM: Hey Crazy Harry and all his idiots!---

    As an expert on energy I have these points...
    1) Solar --- inefficient and double the cost. Solar has been ineffective since the 1970's.
    2) Wind --- double the cost. Oh, Harry, ask your buddy Teddy Kennedy why he doesn't want a wind farm built near his Hyannisport compound?!
    3) Goethermal --- not very efficient and just as much sulfur pollution and more groundwater pollution than coal.

    One question that I would love to have crazy Harry answer is why conservation is never discussed!? Let's keep building inefficient homes and casinos in the desert, load them with air conditioners and massive swimming pools. CASE IN POINT - THE MGM SIGN ALONE USES 1 MEGAWATT OF POWER [that is equivalent to the power used by 750 homes here in the valley]. Multiply that by nearly every casino on the strip and you get a massive waste of electricity/energy. I guess when aging Harry is getting his comped fight tickets from MGM, he doesn't care to bring points like that up.

    I'm certain he's using this as a ploy to shake down the power industry for campaign contributions before we the people from the state of Nevada vote him out of office.


    Report abuse

    RANDY wrote on August 19, 2007 01:15 PM: PLEASE, SOMEONE TELL HARRY REID NOT DO ANYTHING. LEAVE POLITICS OUT OF THE POWER PRODUCTION. WE NEED MORE POWER FROM ALL SOURCES. EVERY TIME THE POLITICANS GET INVOLVED, THEY MESS IT ALL UP. IF MR. REID WANTS TO HELP US ALL OUT, WHY DON'T HE PUSH FOR LEGISLATION THAT WOULD LET HOME-OWNERS PUT SOLAR PANELS ON THEIR ROOF- WHICH THEY COULD SELL THEIR SURPLUS POWER TO NV POWER. RIGHT KNOW, YOU CAN'T DO THAT! THERE IS A LAW THAT SAYS YOU ARE NOT ALOUD TO SELL MORE POWER THAN YOU USE. THANKS TO OUR FEARLESS LEADERS.


    Report abuse

    Anthony wrote on August 19, 2007 12:13 PM: Too bad Nevada Solar one CAN produce at night. You're just all ignorant about how it works.

    It uses phase-changing molten salts, which are efficient at storing heat over long periods of time, and can furnish power during the night.

    So yes, solar thermal CAN produce power when the sun isn't up.


    Report abuse

    Mary wrote on August 19, 2007 12:01 PM: Dear Anthony,

    Now this math might be difficult for you to comprehend so pay close attention. While your Nevada Solar One isn't producing power during the night, what is? A fossil fuel plant, of course.

    You say that over 20 years a coal plant will cost $6,300/kW. Well, half of that is $3,150, which needs to be added to your claimed cost to deliver solar energy, which you really didn't want us to know.

    Your own analysis proves that solar is too expensive. At least that's the conclusion I have to draw since you chose to compare the costs to build and operate a 1.6GW coal plant to a 400MW solar plant, or as you say is: "less than a third of 1.5GW". What are you concluding, if only 400MW is produced, that's all that will be needed?

    I know, you want us to live in the stone age like the North Koreans. Look at a nighttime satellite photo of NK. (For all we know they really want nuclear power because their solar power doesn't work at night!) The only light on is at the Clinton/Kim mansion.


    Report abuse

    Tim wrote on August 19, 2007 11:47 AM: Nevada Solar One should be called Nevada Solar One-half. After all, it ain't producing nothing half of the time!


    Report abuse

    WhereTheSunDontShine wrote on August 19, 2007 11:46 AM: Harry,
    What happens to all those bright lights in Vegas that solar energy can't power, because the Sun is on the other side of the earth and it's dark here?

    I'm tired of 50 percent of my power bill being dependent on what someone in another state wants to charge for it.

    We need more power plants in the Nevada. And that includes plants that can produce electricity 24 HOURS PER DAY.


    Read All Comments