Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


NUISANCE PROPERTIES: Parties are no fun for neighbors

Las Vegas leaders look to ban 'short-term vacation rentals'

The sign was in the garage, but the garage door was open and people passing by on the residential street -- families, children -- could see what was written on it.

"If you want a whore," the sign said, "honk your horn."


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Two suspects in officer's slaying could face death penalty
  • Corrections officer dies in collision on U.S. 95
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat




  • That was one of several reports of "party houses" that ended up on the desks of Las Vegas City Council members Lois Tarkanian and Steve Wolfson. But under the current city code, there is little that can be done when residential neighborhoods have unwelcome house guests.

    Las Vegas leaders are now looking at a ban on "short-term vacation rentals" -- in this case, renting a residence for "dwelling, lodging or sleeping purposes" for fewer than 31 days -- in residential zones.

    A subcommittee of the City Council will review the proposal today. A council vote has yet to be scheduled.

    The ordinance would be similar to restrictions passed in Henderson and Clark County, where officials have found that while enforcing the ban can be tricky, it at least offers a way to respond when problems pop up.

    "There has been a proliferation of these party houses," said Wolfson, who represents Ward 2. "If you lived next door or across the street, and you've got dozens of people going in or out, and you've got party buses that park in your neighborhood, that's disturbing."

    Tarkanian blamed much of the problem on out-of-state owners who rent their houses by the week or weekend.

    "The problem is, when you rent for a weekend to individuals who are having big parties or something like that, you're commercializing a residential area and you're causing parking problems and you're causing situations," she said.

    Short-term rentals are already not allowed in city code, according to a staff report. But it's hard to enforce that without language specifically banning that type of rental.

    The city of Henderson found itself in that same boat a few years ago, and in July 2006 banned rentals of single-family homes for fewer than 30 days. Henderson's ban doesn't apply to multifamily housing such as apartments or condominiums.

    "We had gotten some complaints in neighborhoods concerning weekend rentals, concerning traffic and parking," said Mark Zalaoras, deputy city attorney. "It's to preserve the neighborhood character as a single-family neighborhood."

    Enforcement has been mixed. There have been successes, but in other cases the property owners have taken steps to disguise what they're doing.

    And, as a check of Craigslist or sites like vacationhomes.com shows, people are still renting out their homes to visitors in spite of the bans.

    There usually has to be a complaint filed before any action is taken, said Zalaoras and Rob Warhola, a deputy district attorney for Clark County.

    The county has a longer enforcement record, having passed its ban in 1998. Most reports are handled by the Clark County Public Response Office, which did not have enforcement numbers immediately available.

    The worst of the worst, though, go to Warhola, who said he's handled half a dozen of the cases over the years.

    Perhaps the biggest case came out of a gated community where a property owner was renting out more than a dozen homes that he owned, "a multimillion dollar operation," Warhola said.

    In another case, a woman owned three houses on a cul-de-sac and was angling for a fourth one.

    "They're willing to fight for that," he said. "If they're making enough money, they're going to do whatever it takes to get around that ordinance."

    Prosecuting a violator can be tricky.

    Neighbor reports help: People next door, for instance, can testify about noise, rowdy behavior and the fact that different cars are parked at the house every weekend. Internet ads marketing the house can be a part of the case, too.

    What seals the prosecution is usually documents, Warhola said.

    In the case of the gated community, logs kept by the security guard helped prove that guests were rotating in and out of the houses. The most valuable documents, though, are overlapping leases.

    In past cases, he's found landlords who "lease" the property for a month, but include a clause allowing the lease to be terminated easily. Sometimes, there will be several month-long leases for the same house in the same month, Warhola said.

    "It's just a big problem, or it can be," he said, and not just because of noise, traffic problems, and limos arriving with "ladies who look like prostitutes getting out."

    The houses don't meet fire and safety guidelines for commercial enterprises, and often the operators don't have business licenses.

    Neighbors of the party houses, though, are more concerned about home life than regulations.

    Las Vegas resident Keri DeMattia began agitating for a change in city policies after last Thanksgiving, when she arrived home to find a full-size tour bus parked in front of the house next door that was partially blocking her driveway.

    It was the final straw.

    "Every Thursday to Sunday is a different turnover of people, said DeMattia, who lives near the intersection of Buffalo and Oakey.

    "We pick up their beer bottles, and clean up their garbage, and listen to their parties. ... I don't know who's there. I have two small kids. It puts a damper on the way we live."

    Southwest Las Vegas resident Anna Williams and her neighbors experienced more than a damper earlier this year. One night, organizers of a party on their street actually blocked access to all vehicles except tour buses arriving with guests.

    There are two houses on her block that have been used for visiting revelers, Williams said.

    "They were dropping off loads and loads of people," she said. "They had a party that just threw the neighborhood for a loop."

    It was a heckuva party indeed, said Anne Caddick, who lives in between the two raucous houses on a street near Buffalo and West Sahara. There were spotlights, four full tour buses, valet parking, a red carpet at the entrance and a live band out back.

    "I don't have any objections to neighbors throwing a party," she said. "But it's a commercial event. ... I don't think that's something for a family or friends. It's nuts."

    They called police, Caddick said, and while the officers were sympathetic, the party's organizers apparently had the permits needed to hold the event.

    In fact, Caddick is a little worried that the ordinance under consideration won't apply to her street's situation. The houses there appear to be used for events, not lodging.

    "It might not even cover that; they're using it to hold parties," she said. "It would be great if the ordinance does help, or at least puts a damper on their activities so it's not as easy to do it."

    DeMattia said she's looking forward to the enactment of some kind of restriction.

    "I sure hope that something comes to be," she said. "We paid a lot of money to live in a nice neighborhood so I don't have to worry about my kids playing outside."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    McGrath wrote on September 04, 2007 11:03 PM: Banning short term vacation rentals is wrong. It's just another way for the government to butt their nose into other people's business. I do not rent out my house, but if I wanted to, I'll be damned if someone is going to tell me I can't do it. That is absolute BS. While I do understand that late night parties are annoying to neighbors, that should be handled on a one by one basis. The honest home owner that wants to rent out their property to respectful vacation guests should have the right to do so.


    jack wrote on September 04, 2007 06:31 PM: I would bet if you really took a look at this it is very rare that the problems happen and thousands of times it is a perfect marriage that is person wants to rent and tenant rents and causes no problems
    I understand people are upset but emotions should be set aside when making rules or laws by the way we already have occupancy limits noise and nusaince laws we do not need a reverse condemnation law suit filed against the local government if people have the right to to do something now you will have a heck of a time taking that away with out paying them leave it alone the sky is not falling just pick up the phone if it gets loud or smells or the number of people or cars parked at your neighbors house gets excessive you would be surprised what will happen if you use the rights you have.


    Tom D wrote on September 04, 2007 05:57 PM: I have a vacation rental next door to me the property is the best cared for in the whole neighborhood The owner stays with in the occupancy limits the tenats almost always rent a car at the airport and have parked in the garage or on the drive way the whole process screens itself as the rent is high also the tenans re usually familys that have a hard tme be accomadated by the hotels I have had this house as a neighbor for over 2 years and it has been fine best neighbor I could have


    Rich wrote on September 04, 2007 04:50 PM: senseless intolerance is as bad as senselessly disturbing your neighbors.... this is las vegas for crying out loud....

    if you are too often intolerant and or too often bothering your neighbors... then you need to be corrected otherwise...
    quit whining all the time about noise and people having a great time... that is what people.... normal people do

    or move to California....or is it Kalifornia...


    Sep wrote on September 04, 2007 01:57 PM: Peter Pufferton:

    If you or your tenants are pimping or dealing out of your million dollar home; or your rockstar parties are disrupting the neighborhood, you deserve to be busted.

    If I'm your neighbor, I'll happily turn you in.


    jennifer wrote on September 04, 2007 11:27 AM: People like Peter Pufferton are the reason I will only live in an HOA. This isn't nanny state regulations; these are private individuals enacting private regulations to make sure their home values are protected. The State is only involved when HOA's become too restrictive in certain ways. (Insert whatever nonsense you want to here about government.)

    I don't want to have to bring a lawsuit against a neighbor creating a nuisance so I live in an HOA and make sure the CC&Rs are enforced properly.

    If Peter doesn't want to live with regs, he doesn't have to live in an HOA neighborhood. If he does choose to live in one, then he should be afraid if he chooses to break the CC&Rs or his association isn't doing a good job for the other 99% of the residents who abide by the CC&Rs.

    I agree with Joe... If people treated each other respectfully, no one would have to live in an HOA. I never lived in one growing up back East but here, I wouldn't live without one. This story points out one reason why.


    Homeowner wrote on September 04, 2007 11:22 AM: Re-Puffer: i too will pay a million dollars for a home, but that does not mean i want to listen to my neighbors noisy parties, much less be blocked from my own driveway so some goon can have a party. House parties are fine, so long as they do not inconvenience the entire neighborhood. So much for being civil and respecting the rights of others. I've taken trash that was left all over my street once from a house party and piled it all over the front yard of the culprits house..oh and i made sure to break all the beer bottles right on their doorstep. my idiot of a neighbor must have been barefoot that morning because i saw him in foot bandages later that day...he thought that it was his party guests that pulled this prank on him...and their hasnt been another party since.


    Greg McFarlane wrote on September 04, 2007 11:14 AM: Pam's comment was fascinating, Frank's even more so.

    I can't imagine that that's a cop's house. It sure is fun to speculate as to which crooked, corrupt, underqualified, ethically compromised, morbidly obese, or race-baiting judge's house that is.


    joe wrote on September 04, 2007 10:43 AM: If people weren't such lazy, inconsiderate, selfish neighbors HOAs wouldn't have a reason to exist.



    Sep wrote on September 04, 2007 10:30 AM: Peter Pufferton:

    If you or your tenants are pimping or dealing out of your million dollar home; or having rockstar parties that disrupt the neighborhood, you deserve to be busted.

    If I'm your neighbor, I'll happily turn your a$$ in.


    Read All Comments