Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


Outlaw industry, ex-prostitutes say

Researcher spotlights human trafficking







Kathleen Mitchell worked as a prostitute for more than two decades before her pimp was finally sent to jail.

"I wasn't a drug addict; I was addicted to a man," Mitchell, now 64, said. "That's the worst drug there is."


Most Popular Stories
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • TRAFFIC STOP: Shooting accounts conflict
  • NORM: At time, drug use wasn't suspected
  • One motorcyclist killed, another critically injured in accident
  • NORM: Marie Osmond, manager battling
  • Nurseries fence out day laborers
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • REFUSING THEIR OWN MEDICINE: Vaccination policy spurs legal action




  • Mitchell, who often saw her boyfriend pimp beat up other prostitutes, escaped prostitution 18 years ago. But its effects are lasting.

    "If I have a relationship, it's probably going to be a bad one," she said.

    Her story was one of several shared by former prostitutes Wednesday morning at a Sawyer Building news conference to announce the release of researcher Melissa Farley's book, "Prostitution & Trafficking in Nevada: Making the Connections," published by the San Francisco-based nonprofit Prostitution Research and Education.

    The event also served as the introduction of a new local anti-trafficking organization, Nevada Coalition Against Sex Trafficking.

    The women joined Farley, former Nye County Commissioner Candice Trummell and Assemblyman Bob Beers, R-Henderson, in attacking prostitution in all its forms and calling for it to be outlawed in all of Nevada, not just in certain counties such as Clark and Washoe.

    "Prostitution is not work," said Farley, a psychologist who has spent years researching prostitution and its psychological effects. "Rather, it's a human rights violation."

    The group argued that legal prostitution can be just as harmful to women as illegal prostitution because both involve kinds of abuse and cause long-lasting psychological damage.

    "What happens in legal brothels is sexual harassment, sexual exploitation and sometimes rape," Farley said. "Despite the claims to the contrary, legal prostitution does not protect women from the violence, verbal abuse, physical injury or diseases such as HIV that occur in illegal prostitution."

    Brothel industry lobbyist George Flint later attacked the idea that women who work as legal prostitutes are abused.

    "Anybody that has an ounce of brain or intelligence has to know they (legal and illegal prostitution) are two different things," he said. "We don't traffic women. We don't hire trafficked women. We don't work with pimps. We treat the girls with respect and dignity and we take care of them."

    Kate Hausbeck, senior associate dean of UNLV's graduate college and an associate professor of sociology, also differed with some of Farley's conclusions.

    Hausbeck said she supports an adult woman's right to "choose how they want to use their bodies in the marketplace."

    "My goal is to always protect the rights of women," she said. "We have to ask the women involved and take their answers seriously."

    But Farley said prostitution is "not a freely made choice."

    "When women say, 'I'm happy. I'm making money,' that's just the tiniest bit of the surface," she said. "Under duress from legal and illegal pimps, women hide their coerced status in prostitution. Many people refuse to believe just how bad it is for women."

    Hausbeck said disbelieving women who say they are happy in prostitution is "really condescending."

    "It's frankly dismissive of women as uninformed, silly children, which is exactly the perspective we should have moved far beyond."

    She said the word "trafficking" is often misused to indicate anyone who is involved in prostitution, instead of only those who are forced into sex work against their wills.

    If an adult "is walked across the state line or a national border intending to do sex work of their own free will, without any force, they are making this decision, and to me that's very different," she said.

    But Farley and others argue a clear link exists between legal and illegal prostitution and sex trafficking.

    "Sex trafficking happens when men demand the right to buy women," Farley said.

    Terri Miller, director of the Anti-Trafficking League Against Slavery, which formed last year within the Metropolitan Police Department, said that Nevada is a ripe environment for human trafficking because it is the only state that has legalized prostitution.

    "I don't believe all prostitution is sex trafficking, but I believe the majority of women who are prostitutes have been the victim of sex trafficking at some point in their lives."

    Miller said each time a prostitute engages in a sex act, "it is very much victimizing."

    "The reality is that they are having to engage in a sex act with a complete stranger as many times as 30 times a day. It is not a victimless crime."

    Those who want to leave prostitution have a difficult time finding help, especially in Nevada, Farley said.

    "Most women in prostitution want to escape it," she said. "In prostitution, the conditions that make choice possible are absent. If we really want to say it's a choice, women need a range of options."

    Jody Williams, a former prostitute and member of the Nevada Coalition Against Sex Trafficking, agreed.

    "When women quit prostitution, they ... suffer from a broad range of physical and emotional disorders," she said. "Women in prostitution suffer from the same combat stress that Vietnam and combat vets do, but they have fewer services than vets do."

    Former prostitutes "wind up on welfare, disability, public housing and on the street," Williams said.

    She joined Farley and others in calling for harsher penalties against those who hire prostitutes, instead of arresting the prostitutes themselves.

    Farley's book is based on a U.S. State Department-sponsored study of prostitution and trafficking in Nevada.

    The U.S. Department of Justice has recognized Las Vegas as one of 17 cities where human trafficking is a concern.

    The book includes interviews with and demographics of women working in legal Nevada brothels. It explores the link between legal brothels and psychological distress and disease, the trafficking of legal and illegal prostitutes in Nevada, escort and strip club prostitution in Las Vegas, advertising for prostitution and barriers to escaping prostitution.

    The Nevada Coalition Against Sex Trafficking will work to educate people about trafficking, identify services for victims and change Nevada laws related to prostitution, said Trummell, the organization's director.

    "It is way past time for Nevada to become the last state in the United States of America to finally stand against all forms of slavery," Trummell said. "It is time for Nevada to start adhering to the U.S. government's own official and very strong stance against legalized prostitution."

    Attempts to outlaw prostitution in all of Nevada have cropped up but have not gotten far in the Legislature, which has shown a preference for letting rural communities handle the issue themselves.

    Beers said he would support making prostitution illegal in all of Nevada.

    A brothel owner, he said, is "somebody who, when it gets down to the very essence, is nothing more than a slave-owner."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 46 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    mason wrote on April 27, 2009 09:00 AM: It's entirely issue of free-will. I'm sure abuse does occur in the labor divsion of prositution, which is precisely the nature of it. A job. And every employee is protected by the rights of their states. If legally employed fornicators were abused or attacked. They could sue their employer or have the attacker arrested or if they could not endure verbal abuse(who cares) they can quit. Free will. Also if they are paid "unfairly" they can quit. Free will. Also if the situations are horrible to the extent that it violates state law, they could sue. Free Will. An entitlement that isn't altered because of the nature of the job. My summation: Free will, Free Will, Free Will, Free Will, Free Will.


    Report abuse

    Valerie wrote on March 14, 2009 04:53 AM: The majority of ex-prostitutes in the world would agree with Farley on this one, despite the high presence of the most well-funded (computer-owning, internet accessing, English speaking) and privileged minority on internet comment boards.

    I, for example, think she's awesome.

    And the Swedish law is not based on sex; a woman would get arrested for buying a male prostitute.


    Report abuse

    Darr wrote on October 29, 2008 09:27 AM: What is fair is fair. I don't understand why pornography is legal and prostitution is not. They are paying for sex in both cases. Why does a camera make the act legal? I don't really care one way or the other. I do however think it should be all or nothing. If you can pay someone to have sex in front of a camera, then you should be able to pay them to have sex without one. I would be just as happy (well almost) if they stopped the hypocrisy and made both illegal. I am just so tired of double standards.


    Report abuse

    Alan wrote on October 27, 2008 08:37 PM: You would like to read what Veronica Monet has to say

    She has lots to say on the subject and has years of experience and is also a certified sex therapist

    http://veronicamonet.com


    Report abuse

    yeah only in your dreams wrote on January 21, 2008 06:41 PM: I worked a brothel and i was never force to nothing but to suport my family. No body makes do anything thing I dont want to do. The only back exprierence I had in there was two madam that are bitches and need to be on prozac. I have met the onwers of them and they are nice help you any way they can. I can say that about the madams those except for the one i am in now she is real nice lady.I dont know where our freedom of chorce is going any more pretty soon we will not have any freedom left if we the people let these religion church going hipocrips run our lifes.


    Report abuse

    Memphis Steve wrote on December 13, 2007 07:10 AM: According to Farley's book, the United States should emulate Sweden, where a woman selling sex is protected by the law, but a man buying is a criminal. It's a dual system of law biased by sex rather than any sort of pretense of equality. I guess we should just toss the Bill of Rights in the trash and give the female supremacists anything and everything they want. Everything women do is legal, anything men do is illegal. To hell with equal rights, lets just go straight to feminist fascism. As for women in the sex industry who disagree with Miss Farley, they are clearly suffering from some mysterious syndrome (caused by men) that only Miss Farley can diagnose. They must be sent to a mental facility for reeducation immediately. Men, of course, who aren't homosexuals and thus want sex with women, should all be rounded up and placed in ovens where they will be eliminated. It's the Final Solution to the 'problem' of human sexuality, something feminism is dedicated to stamping out once and for all.


    Report abuse

    Me wrote on October 29, 2007 12:46 PM: I just love how they always leave out those of us ladies who CHOOSE to do this of our own free will. We are called independants and do it because we want to or because we enjoy it. Where are the statistics on that?


    Report abuse

    steven wrote on September 16, 2007 07:12 PM: what happens between two consenting adults should not be the business of the government, period. butt out.


    Report abuse

    Iamcuriousblue wrote on September 16, 2007 12:10 PM: I should also note that the "legal brothel" model of prostitution is NOT one that's favored by most sex workers, even those that strongly favor decriminalization of both the buying and selling of sex. Basically, the legal brothels as they're now constituted significantly compromise a the brothel worker's freedom of movement and other basic liberties, and disempower them in ways that can lead to all kinds of abuses. There are several good articles on the subject here:

    http://www.sexwork.com/legal/NevPimpHouses.html

    Also, the sex worker rights blog Bound Not Gagged will be responding to Farley's report in a blog-in about this planned for the evening of Monday 9/17. More info here:

    http://www.scapa-lv.org/whats_hot/lv_call_to_action.htm


    Report abuse

    Iamcuriousblue wrote on September 16, 2007 12:06 PM: Before passing judgement based on this report, it might be a good idea to read up on Melissa Farley's background and where she's coming from ideologically.

    Basically, she's a very extreme radical feminist that believes any buying of sex under any and all circumstances amounts to an act of rape. Also, her research methodology is highly questionable and she's been called on this before. To say that she represents the interests of women in prostitution is debatable – there is a contingent of ex-prostitutes (who mostly have been involved in particularly abusive situations vis a vis prostitution) that support her. However, there's also a large sex workers rights movement who are very opposed to her.

    The following Wikipedia page offers a good introduction to Farley:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melissa_Farley

    In particular, follow the links to the articles featuring her debates with social scientist Ronald Weitzer, which should provide good background info for evaluating her recent report. Also note that this report is self-published, meaning its not a peer-reviewed study. There's good reason why Farley's questionable methodology has a hard time making it through the peer review process.

    I comment more fully on this on my own blog:

    http://bppa.blogspot.com/2007/09/melissa-farleys-latest-bound-not-gagged.html


    Read All Comments