Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

sponsored by
News


Professor doubts 'surplus'

Tapping rural groundwater will cause harm, article's author says

There's no such thing as "surplus water."

It might be described that way by Southern Nevada Water Authority officials when they apply for permission to tap into the state's rural water supply, said James Deacon, a professor emeritus of environmental studies at UNLV.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • FATAL SHOOTING: Police again mourn comrade
  • NORM: Biden finds rank has its privileges
  • NORM: Walton: Coach deserved a punch
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • DEADLY HOME INVASION: Police suspect link to family
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • NORM: 'Girls Gone Wild' creator feels heat
  • UNLV sacks football coach Sanford




  • But there really is no "surplus."

    Every drop that's siphoned off to slake the growing thirst of Las Vegas already sustains a form of life, said Deacon, the lead author of a newly published research piece in BioScience magazine.

    The article in the September issue examines the consequences of depleting Nevada's groundwater reserves. It's a practice Deacon said poses a serious threat to both Nevada agriculture and 20 species of already endangered wildlife, from the Devil's Hole pupfish to the Southwestern Willow flycatcher.

    "The only way we're going to avoid environmental disaster and disaster to rural livelihoods is to combine growth stabilization policies with creative, cutting-edge technology," Deacon said, echoing the points he presented to readers of the national publication on biology research.

    That means pushing conservation over consumption, using technology to improve water reclamation, and finding a way to slow growth.

    Deacon acknowledged that turning away from growth and allowing the demand for water to flatten out flies in the face of the developer-friendly policies maintained by local governments. He hopes to shift public support away from growth agendas and refocus it on keeping Las Vegas livable.

    "This is the most policy-directed piece of science writing I've ever done," Deacon said of the peer-reviewed article crafted over four years. "We must recognize the cost we're imposing, not only on our neighbors, but also on the environment."

    The impetus for Deacon's scholarly activism is the water authority's plan to divert water from a rural aquifer that extends across the central and southern state for use in Las Vegas.

    In April, the state engineer gave the water authority permission to take up to 40,000 acre-feet of water annually from Spring Valley, the White Pine County aquifer due west of Snake Valley. The water authority is seeking permission to tap into other eastern Nevada water resources.

    Kay Brothers, deputy general manager of the water authority, has read part of Deacon's article and been briefed on the rest of it by staff members. She said she respects Deacon and his position but said he fails to consider the safeguards that will prevent the worst-case scenario from happening.

    "You can manage the groundwater system," Brothers said Thursday. "There's also a body of law in place to protect the groundwater system and monitor the impact on sensitive resources."

    And no one can deny the need for more water, which Brothers said is not rooted solely in growth. Drawing off water from the rural groundwater reserves also is a form of drought protection at a time when Colorado River resources are diminishing.

    "If we can't utilize the groundwater resources in this state, what are we going to do?" Brothers asked.

    The water authority already encourages conservation and issues rebates for replacing grass with desert-friendly landscaping, Brothers said. The water authority also has negotiated for a larger share of the Colorado River.

    But controlling growth, as Deacon suggests, is something Brothers said she cannot even begin to address.

    "I don't know how to do that," Brothers said. "How do you tell people not to move here?"

    Deacon examined the laws that govern water use and the protection of sensitive resources and found them lacking.

    The laws were written at a time when no one envisioned the type of expansion now taking place, he said. One of the results is that the potential claims on rural water reserves are now greater than the expected annual input.

    Deacon found that existing groundwater permits for the 78 basins examined in the article appropriate 102 percent of the basins' cumulative perennial yield. That gap could widen drastically should the state engineer approve additional requests from other entities for water allocations from the rural reserves.

    History shows the consequences of that course of action, Deacon said.

    In the 1950s, overzealous groundwater pumping led to the failure of major Las Vegas Valley springs, leading to the extinction of more than one native fish, including the Las Vegas dace.

    "Providing for the water needs of a growing Las Vegas Valley by relying on historical practices is a recipe for ecological disaster," Deacon said in the article.

    "New technologies can help increase water availability and efficiency of use, but in the long run they are futile unless combined with reduced growth of human populations."

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 3 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Ray Walker wrote on September 23, 2007 05:18 AM: Kay Brothers, Deputy General Manager of SNWA's question, "If we can't utilize the groundwater resources in this state, what are we going to do?", borders on serious dishonesty with regard to the people served by SNWA.
    For 4 years, I have offered SNWA a fresh water Source of 750,000 AF/yr that is not only physically available, but legally, environmentally and economically feasible to develop. The development of the Source will not damage the water rights of anyone anywhere !
    I have warned SNWA that withdrawal of the subject groundwater may greatly increase the arsenic concentration for SNWA & others who utilize the aquifer as the water level recedes.

    It is widely accepted that naturally occurring arsenic dissolves out of certain rock formations in the region when ground water levels drop significantly.

    I continue to encourage SNWA to look at a real Source solution that enhances all that SNWA has planned ! The Source may very well save SNWA hundreds of millions of dollars, in more ways than SNWA can imagine !

    Flows from the Source can also solve the water shortage dilemmas of Lake Mead, yet the Bureau of Reclamation is unwilling to formulate a way to investigate the Source by providing a few crumbs from the "water table" for knowledge of ample supply !

    Environmental groups gather to wring their hands in dispare, yet the Source is adequate for substantial restoration of the Colorado River Delta and the Salton Sea which they have evaluated to be worth billions of dollars per year.

    The first step begins with timely communication. I DARE the the entities of NV, CA, UT and AZ to make meaningful contact with me to solve their crises water situations ... !

    Ray Walker
    waterrdw@yahoo.com


    Launce Rake wrote on September 07, 2007 02:34 PM: Lisa Kim Bach, as she usually does, has done a very good job of lining up the arguments on both sides. Those who embrace more slots and tract housing at the cost of the environment are not just dooming are neighbors to toxic dust storms and defoliation, they are also ignoring the very real costs that unchecked development on the quality of life for those of us, like myself, who live in Las Vegas.
    Let's, for once, listen to the scientists and do the sensible thing. Let's take a look at where we're going and ask, how far can we go, how long can we continue, like this?


    cas127 wrote on September 07, 2007 09:10 AM: The environmental absolutist position ("something is going to die if we do *anything* to the environment") is stupid.

    So is the developer absolutist position ("Duh..uhhh...how can one influence growth, I'm clueless as to how that might be done...duhh...uhhh").

    Folks - how about letting the price of water rise somewhat above the government subsidized price that we Westerners currently pay.

    Result = reduced (but by no means eliminated growth).

    We'll have some dead fish from an insanely small population of some obscure subspecies that only exists along a 5 foot stretch of some tiny river in the middle of nowhere and...

    The casinos will have to make due with a 4% annual increase in the number of their addicted customer base coming to live here rather than an 8% increase.

    Boo hoo.

    Everybody grow up and pull your brains out of your *****.