News

Sloan Hills project has cloudy future

By STEVE TETREAULT
STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU
Posted: Dec. 22, 2010 | 7:30 p.m.

WASHINGTON -- Congress adjourned Wednesday without acting on a bill to outlaw gravel mining at Sloan Hills, leaving residents anxious about the possibility of a pit operation near Henderson neighborhoods.

As the Senate neared a close this week, Republicans blocked action on legislation covering about 100 public lands and wilderness initiatives, including the Southern Nevada bill and several others involving the state.

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., tried to negotiate a scaled-down bill, aides said Wednesday. But in the meantime, the House of Representatives adjourned for the year, and the Senate followed suit a few hours later.

Other Nevada public land efforts that were included in the broad legislation were:

■ A transfer of 2,085 acres of federal land in North Las Vegas to the Nevada university system.

■ A $415 million authorization for further environmental reclamation at Lake Tahoe.

■ A 50-year extension of contracts for electricity from Hoover Dam.

Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak said Reid told him that if the Sloan Hills legislation is not passed, he would continue to pursue it next year. The bill, which declares the site off limits to mining, would need to be reintroduced and have new hearings.

"He told me he was still making it a priority," Sisolak said. "Senator Ensign made the same commitment to me."

In the meantime, Sisolak said there is still heightened concern about a gravel quarry proposed for 640 acres of federal land in the south valley.

The site is about three miles from the Sun City Anthem development and other Henderson neighborhoods where residents have rallied against what they fear will be dirt and dust pollution, noise and heavy truck traffic.

"In the past month I've had 50 e-mails and calls from residents in the area who are concerned. Everybody gets all riled up and concerned, and rightfully so," Sisolak said. "People want some definitive, conclusive actions. Until this is passed and signed, people will be apprehensive."

Two companies, Mexico-based Cemex and Service Rock Products of California, have sought to lease the Bureau of Land Management property, which contains construction aggregates used to make concrete.

According to the BLM, there are no plans to turn dirt anytime soon. The agency is conducting a draft environmental impact study on the proposal to mine in the area.

BLM spokeswoman Kirsten Cannon said the draft study could be finished early next year. That would be followed by a 120-day public comment period, the completion of a final environmental study, the issuance of a formal record of decision, and a 30-day protest period.

"I would think a rough guesstimate would be another year," Cannon said.

In Washington, Republicans complained that Democrats were overreaching in trying to pass a broad public lands and wilderness bill in the final days of the session.

While a number of individual pieces enjoyed support, GOP senators said several controversial proposals were included in the mix.

Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. dodgerchuck Dec. 23, 2010 | 11:27 p.m. Report Abuse

    is she any relation to walter cannon

  2. watchout Dec. 23, 2010 | 9:04 a.m. Report Abuse

    Interesting article. What is more interesting is why aren't there any quotes from the City of Henderson Mayor and Council? With the municipal elections coming up you would think they would jump all over this press. But all we get is a quote from Sisolak. Hmmmm. I guess The City of Henderson supports the mine.

  3. Judy.Bundorf Dec. 23, 2010 | 7:46 a.m. Report Abuse

    What could be "greener" than an aggregate mine close to where the materials will be used? A short haul means less fuel used, less wear on tires and equipment, and far less carbon emitted. Perhaps the folks in Anthem can convince Mr. Reid and Mr. Sisolak to instead approve the construction of fifty or sixty 500 foot tall wind turbines on the site. Now that's greener yet!

  4. TimeRanger Dec. 22, 2010 | 9:50 p.m. Report Abuse

    I guess that All of those NIMBYs in Anthem have never considered where the aggregate that was used to build THEIR homes and roads came from, did they?? Nope - They got theirs, now everyone else is supposed to do without.

Friday, May 25, 2012
Partly Sunny Partly Sunny, 77° Weather Forecast