Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Breaking News


Democrats outvoting Republicans North and South

After four days of voting, Democrats continue to show up to the polls in much greater numbers than Republicans in both Northern and Southern Nevada.

At the close of polling Tuesday, a total of nearly 65,000 Democrats had cast ballots in Clark and Washoe counties, compared to just over 30,000 Republicans.


Most Popular Stories
  • Coroner says sexual assault suspect killed by police was shot in back
  • Ensign wrote lover a letter, saying their affair was a 'sin'
  • Motorcyclist killed after hitting light pole
  • Local home sales in June break 2004 record
  • Police: Man admits killing his wife this morning
  • Coroner's office identifies man killed by police last week
  • 409 arrests made in Nevada sting led by U.S. Marshal's office
  • Body of a female found in burned apartment
  • Fertitta center that helps homeless, others to be closed
  • Man stabbed to death early this morning




  • Registered Democrats accounted for 57 percent of the ballots cast in the first four days, versus 27 percent Republicans and the rest nonpartisan or members of minor parties.

    Statistics breaking down the two parties weren't available for the 15 rural counties. About 85 percent of the state's voters live in the urban counties of Clark and Washoe, both of which now contain more registered Democrats than Republicans.

    Of course, voters don't have to cast ballots for the party with which they're registered, but the numbers appear to give Democrats an advantage in this battleground state.

    Statewide, including the rural counties, more than 136,000 people voted Saturday through Tuesday, a turnout of 11.3 percent of active voters, according to the secretary of state's office. Early voting continues through Oct. 31. Election Day is Nov. 4.

    In Clark County, more than 90,000 people voted during the first four days; four years ago, the figure was 57,000. The county, home to 800,000 registered voters, could be on pace to see more than 400,000 early votes, according to prior years' voting patterns.

    By late afternoon Wednesday, 108,000 people had voted in Clark County, surpassing the county's total turnout in August's primary election. That election, which featured no high-profile races, drew a record-low turnout of just 103,000.

    Clark County Registrar of Voters Larry Lomax said limited space at some of the 22 early voting sites, such as grocery stores and portable trailers, has led to occasional long waits for voters, but overall there have been few complaints. Lomax said he expects at least 320,000 early votes countywide, topping 2004's total of 270,000.

    Washoe County Registrar Dan Burk said he expects early votes to reach 60,000.

    Clark County is the state's Democratic stronghold, but the Democratic turnout so far is disproportionate. Democrats account for 58 percent of the votes so far, Republicans 26 percent; Democrats account for 47 percent of all registered voters in the county, versus 32 percent who are Republicans.

    One of those who cast an early ballot in Las Vegas on Wednesday was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who first spoke to a room of about 100 College of Southern Nevada students supporting Democrat Barack Obama.

    Reid noted the Democrats' surge in voter registration in Nevada, a state that four years ago had 5,000 more Republicans than Democrats on the rolls but now has 110,000 more Democrats than Republicans. "Nevada is going to prove to everybody that we're not a red state," he said. "We're a state that has changed."

    Reminiscing about fighting in the 1970s to lower the voting age to 18, Reid said, "Frankly, it's been very disappointing, because people 18 to 21 simply haven't voted. But not this time. Young people are going to be the difference in this election."

    Alluding to the fact that, if elected, Obama would be the first black president, Reid said today's young voters are more colorblind than previous generations. "If you're from 18 to 35, you have no prejudice — you don't care about color of skin, religion or gender. It's people who are a bit older who have some old beliefs they can't shake off."

    Reid, along with Rep. Shelley Berkley, led the students to the public library on the CSN campus, located at the intersection of Charleston Boulevard and Torrey Pines Drive, a busy early voting site. Voting machines were set up onstage in the library's auditorium, the velvet curtains parted around them as if for actors taking a bow.

    Also voting at the site was Lindsay Michael, an English as a Second Language instructor at the college. She said she was voting for Obama too.

    "I vote for whoever I think is going to do a better job," said Michael, a 32-year-old Las Vegan. "This time, I think it's very apparent. And I feel like the other party is being obnoxious, flat out."

    Observers say there's no doubt Democrats are far more organized this year than any election in memory. But the Obama campaign says it doesn't want to get overconfident based on the early turnout surge, which could be a reflection of pent-up excitement on the part of a small core of partisans.

    "It's been a really long election season, and a lot of our most ardent supporters wanted to vote right away," Obama spokeswoman Kirsten Searer said. "We need to keep up the pace, keep pushing hard."

    Meanwhile, the campaign of Republican John McCain professed to be undaunted by the statistics, saying Republicans are confident they'll catch up by the time votes are tallied.

    "Four years ago at this time, Democrats were darned near dancing in the streets," McCain spokesman Rick Gorka said. "There was high turnout, they said people were excited and voting for change. Yet we all know what happened. When it comes down to it, Republicans turn out better when it counts."

    The partisan breakdown will level out as early voting continues, he predicted, and Election Day turnout will be "dominated" by the GOP. Republicans currently have a slight edge in absentee ballots in Clark County, 8,900 to 8,200.

    "Democrats are doing what they always do," Gorka said. "They say that they've won, and then they lose."

    In 2004 in Clark County, Democrats were 46 percent of the total early votes, Republicans 39 percent. Democratic nominee John Kerry won the county, 52 percent to 47 percent, but President Bush carried the state by a margin of 20,000 votes.

    Contact reporter Molly Ball at mball@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2919.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 29 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    T. Ryan Outlaw wrote on October 23, 2008 12:31 AM: We might not be a "RED" NECK state afterall.

    This is a historic election and the few states that end up being 'red' will appear behind the times. Kind of like Mississippi always is.

    It's great to see Nevada becomming more progressive and enlightened!

    It's almost time for the country to come together and rally behind President-elect Obama!


    12million reasons wrote on October 22, 2008 11:48 PM: Hillary has $12,000,000 reasons to campaign for Obama.


    vahana wrote on October 22, 2008 11:25 PM: "Lifelong Democrat," I doubt your authenticity. Nothing the McCain/Palin ticket stands for is like what Hillary Clinton stands for, so you're going to betray her loyalty to the Democratic Party and vote Republican?

    On top of this insincerity, you allude to Republican character assassination with your "shady friends" hint, not realizing, perhaps, that such rumors and smears have no substance and that Hillary herself campaigns for and with Senator Obama, obviously no longer concerned, as once she was during the primary, about whom Obama sat on a charity board with and whom he heard sermonize in church.

    Since you're not following Hillary's lead now in supporting Obama, you couldn't have been all that loyal to her or her politics at the beginning.


    Obama's Buddy wrote on October 22, 2008 10:49 PM: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJn5b8_weUY

    Here's what you're voting for.


    Alicia wrote on October 22, 2008 10:38 PM: Poor life-long democrats, forced out of the party they love! Meet your new friends: http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=188638&title=understanding-real-america-in


    Lifelong Democrat wrote on October 22, 2008 10:05 PM: As a life-long Democrat, I just cannot bring myself to vote for Barak Obama. Between Hillary getting shafted and his shady friends I am forced to cross the aisle for the first time in 20 odd years.


    Independent wrote on October 22, 2008 09:39 PM: My wife and I make over 180,000 and we voted for Obama. Its about principle and Obama is good man who fight for the people not the rich.

    McCain support once again strike fear into the election. No positive thoughts or ideas.

    Imagine if Gore had won? No stupid war.




    Blue_Buyou wrote on October 22, 2008 09:03 PM: Man, I would be totally bummed. I mean if the Great Grey Guy, "and Her", were to save me.

    But thats just me......oh, no, THATS the MAJORITY.

    Go Illinois dude!! And Delaware dude!!

    Which way do I cut, across, or upside??
    .....anymore Alaskan Cool-Aid????????
    arggggg. (slits)


    Joe wrote on October 22, 2008 09:02 PM: You guys are right, entrepreneurs do OWE their employees becuase of their hardwork and dedication. And they do that by letting you work for them and giving you a salary and hopefully quality benenefits, and other stuff to show their appreciation.

    If you feel you are being abused or not appreciated by your employer, you should find another job. And if you feel you don't make enough money, go search for a higher paying job. If you're not qualified for one, than that's something you're responisble for.


    Joe wrote on October 22, 2008 08:42 PM: The point of the argument I'm making is that everyone is in control of their own lives.

    You need to accept responsibility for your own actions and not expect handouts from the government. Everyone in this country is able to be succesful, if they wish to be.

    If you're not as financially secure as you think you should be, it's not your employers fault..he didn't make you work there, it's a result of your own actions.

    The more government handouts there are, the less motivation there is for becoming succesful. People will have the attitude, why go to college and get a high paying job when I can drop out of highschool and let other people pay my rent and for my food?

    Only in America do people like Oprah, Obama, Dr.Phil, Bill Clinton raise from the dumps to accomplish the American dream. The more government gets involved to level the playing feid...the less there will be of those type of sucess stories.


    Read All Comments