Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon

Breaking News


Officials warn budget cuts might delay Yucca license review

WASHINGTON — The license review to build a nuclear waste repository at Yucca Mountain is on schedule so far but federal officials warned today that further budget cuts could kick it off track.

There already are signs that tight spending might be having an impact, even before Congress finishes Yucca Mountain bills for 2009 and 2010 that many expect will contain reduced spending.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three children fall from vehicle; mothers arrested
  • Boy struck, killed by car pulling out of driveway
  • Second person dies after being restrained by police
  • Man shot by police identified as local attorney
  • Las Vegas police make arrest in 2008 slaying
  • Judge rules M Resort must reinstate two fired security guards
  • Seven unrestrained children were in car when three fell out
  • MGM Mirage reports $750.4 million quarterly loss
  • MGM Mirage reports $750.4 million quarterly loss
  • Travel club honors Nevada with more Five Diamond properties
  • Jury finds police shooting of 15-year-old justifiable




  • Chris Kouts, deputy director of the Energy Department’s repository program, said there might be a delay in completing a groundwater study the Nuclear Regulatory Commission had ordered as part of its license examination.

    The study is expected to be completed this fall, but “there is a resource issue” that could affect the timetable, Kouts said at a joint DOE-NRC staff meeting.

    The same environmental analysts working on the groundwater report also are being called on to answer a series of other questions the NRC has posed in its license review, Kouts said.

    Also, the same staffers are working under a deadline to respond to issues that the state of Nevada and other stakeholders have filed in the form of legal license contentions.

    Kouts said the push should be over soon.

    “As we sit here now (the groundwater report) is still on schedule but (a delay) has been broached,” Kouts said. “That one is a bit of a challenge. If we do decide the date needs to be modified, we will let you know.”

    Attorneys for Nevada and California, affected county governments, the Nuclear Energy Institute and other participants in Yucca licensing have filed a combined 311 contentions, said Rod McCullum, an NEI official.

    Also, NRC license evaluators so far have sent DOE 82 “requests for additional information” on various segments of the application, said Lawrence Kokajko, director of the NRC division of high-level waste repository safety.

    NRC officials could not say how many questions they might have by the time they finish their examination.

    “You have the same budget situation as we do,” Kokajko told Kouts. “We have had to juggle some things.”

    The NRC staff is preparing a comprehensive safety review that will figure prominently in the agency’s ultimate decision in the next four years or so whether to allow the repository to be built.

    “The NRC staff now is four months into our license review and I’d like to say we consider ourselves on schedule,” Kokajko said, adding the goal is to complete the safety review in 18 months “if we have sufficient resources.”

     

    Contact Stephens Washington Bureau Chief Steve Tetreault at stetreault@stephensmedia.com or 202-783-1760.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 2 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Sheffrey wrote on January 08, 2009 01:43 PM: The anti-nuclear lament "what to do with long-lived radioactive nuclear waste" from nuclear power plants is mostly hyperbole. The "waste" amounts to one aspirin tablet per year per person using nuclear electricity, compared to tons of air pollutants and globe-warming gaseous CO2 emitted by coal or fossil-fuel combustion. Nuclear waste is easily stored and safely transported, as the US nuclear navy has done for half a century. Contrary to allegations that uranium and plutonium in spent fuel elements pose a problem because of million-year half-lives, they are separated from fission products by reprocessing and burnt as fuel in future fast-breeder reactors. They will not be dumped. This reduces 50 tons of spent fuel per reactor per year to 0.5 tons of fission products (with shorter decay lives), taking centuries instead of decades to fill the Yucca Mountain repository in Nevada. The notion that long radioactive lifetimes are undesirable is also erroneous. The longer the decay lifetime, the less the radiation emitted per gram of radio-isotope. Most elements that make up our bodies (hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, etc) have infinitely long decay times. All humans are "hot" because everyone has radioactive potassium-40 (K-40; 0.012% abundance) in his body, which continuously emits beta particles with a half-life of one billion years! Man successfully evolved in this environment, and there are even indications that low levels of radiation benefit health (called hormesis). The hue and cry about possible terrorism and "dirty bombs" is also highly exaggerated. By reasoning of anti-nuclear clubs we should stop flying 707 jets because they can be used as weapons killing thousands of people. Green nuclear power is the only practical solution to simultaneously (1) avoid dependence on foreign oil and gas, (2) overcome future oil and gas depletion, and (3) ameliorate global warming. Yucca is essenital!


    Report abuse

    Steve wrote on January 08, 2009 09:16 AM: Build it and they will come. NRC and DOE - Get off your butts!