Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue

Breaking News


Veterans' court proposal passes

CARSON CITY — The Nevada Senate voted unanimously today for a plan that would allow for specialized courts for military veterans charged with nonviolent crimes while struggling to readjust to civilian life.

AB187 was approved earlier in the Assembly but must return there for approval of Senate amendments before it can be sent to Gov. Jim Gibbons.


Most Popular Stories
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Obama dings Las Vegas — again
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Tourist describes chaos as car plows into Laughlin casino, killing two
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Shutting down the Ritz
  • Former commander of USS Cole considers run against Reid
  • Flood advisory for Las Vegas Valley
  • BUDGET CRUNCH: Schools superintendent says proposed cuts would cost 2,322 teacher jobs
  • BUDGET CRUNCH: Schools superintendent says proposed cuts would cost 2,322 teacher jobs
  • Son of police officer critical after accidentally shooting himself
  • Son of police officer critical after accidentally shooting himself
  • Relatives remember grandmother killed in Laughlin accident
  • Gang member sentenced to prison in 2007 slaying
  • Some community leaders say Goodman overreacted to Obama's latest Las Vegas comment




  • Advocates of AB187, proposed by Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, say it would help veterans charged with crimes and who suffer from mental or substance abuse problems stemming from their military service.

    Under the plan, such veterans could go through a treatment program and, if they complete the program, have their criminal files sealed. In earlier testimony, Buckley said the bill was the least that could be done for veterans who risk their lives to protect the nation.

    The bill, modeled after a veterans' court in Buffalo, N.Y., the first of its sort in the nation, was backed by veterans' organizations but faced initial criticism for creating a justice system specifically for veterans that isn't open to others.

    A change to the bill includes a preamble that lists "limited circumstances" for program eligibility. Another amendment would let successful program participants apply immediately to seal court records, instead of going through a three-year wait proposed in the original bill.

    Former Washoe County District Judge Peter Breen previously told lawmakers that sealed records and avoiding prison would account for a large part of veteran participation in the proposed program.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Brother's Keeper wrote on October 27, 2009 08:00 PM: Thank God for answering our prayers. I just became aware of the Veterans Court and wish I kept up with news and heard of it earlier.


    wife of a Veteran wrote on July 28, 2009 02:56 PM: I can see that none of you have fought in Iraq and come home with the invisible wounds of war - PTSD. I can see that none of you understand that the VA is failing our Veterans in their treatment. I can see that none of you appreciate the fact that Veterans put their lives on the line for our country, and they are coming home totally messed up. It doesn't matter what your opinion war is, these individuals who serve our country ARE different than the career criminal and they DO deserve special consideration in a court of law. If you don't think so - go spend some time in IRAQ, you'll have a different opinion when you return. These courageous men and women ARE DIFFERENT than those of you who sit on your couch and exercise your right to run your mouth about whatever it is......a right that our VETERANS fought to give you. So zip it, until you have the guts to put on a uniform and fight for this country - just zip it.


    Fair and Balanced Fred wrote on April 29, 2009 08:41 PM: As a veteran of the VA Health Care System, especially the most incredibly managed System in the entire System (managed by multiple personality disorders [and I'm talking about the management]) I have to wonder about two tier systems of justice.

    Let's see. Billy is a vet and is a bit whacked because of his stressors in the military.

    Omar is not a vet and is stressed because of his own, post traumatic stress disorder due to an unfortunate upbringing in the 'hood.

    Billy gets special treatment. Omar gets the harshest treatment even though their transgressions are similar.

    Flush Rimjob and the AM radio Fox "News" idiots must love this arrangement. Especially because Flush and Fox and W. Bush are white and never went to war.

    Can the ACLU save us?


    Helen Weils wrote on April 29, 2009 05:00 PM: How much is this "feel good" bill going to cost us? Huh, Barbara? If it's such a great idea why can't consideration be given in the existing courtroom, and why shouldn't it be
    extended to everyone? How about "spreading it around?"
    Huh, Barbara??? How many more government union employees is this going to create,you double dipping,
    government employee? HUH?


    Too many wrote on April 29, 2009 04:45 PM: What happened to equal rights, equal protection under the law, equal justice? Obviously, some are more equal than others, like the rich bast*rds that buy their way out of prison.


    Vet wrote on April 29, 2009 03:27 PM: We have multiple justice systems already. But if the real purpose behind each system is rehabilitation and reentry into society, then, yes, we owe these folks more than the average meth addict. Put the amazing thing is, these vets won't ask for it. So, if the legislature actually does something today that helps its citizens, and a significant portion are active duty or veterans, then I stand up and appauld those people willing to help.


    Marcus wrote on April 29, 2009 02:20 PM: The constitution must be wet with tears. If things weren't bad enough, now we have multiple justice systems. One for you. Another for vets. And a special third one for criminal politicians, torturers, and the financial elite where there's no punishments at all.


    Garbage wrote on April 29, 2009 01:10 PM: Doesn't matter. There are too many cops abusing Vets and too many corrupt judges abusing their rights.

    This wouldn't be needed if this State wern't so abusive and corrupt. Someone needs to control these young cops and stop them from violating peoples rights, vets included.

    Nevada is a "POLICE STATE" with corrupt judges siding with the cops.

    Ask yourself, Who is the real TERRORIST in the country? Not the vets who put their lives on the line to protect you. Its the cops and cudges that are terrorizing you, your freedom and way of life..

    And, you don't even have to be a criminals to get abused.

    The vets need to unite and fight another war. The war against the corrupt cops and judges. Support the US Constitution and what this counrty stands for.

    Stop harrassing the vets in the first place and you wouldn't need this.