Quantcast
Home manage Las Vegas Review-Journal
  Jobs Cars Homes Shopping Travel Weddings Golf Best of Las Vegas Photo   Search:

RECENT EDITIONS
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Breaking News


NV Energy backs off coal-fired Ely Energy Center; Air Force objects to solar plant

Which is better: Fossil fuels or renewable energy?

The answer seems to be neither one, if you listen to a passel of politicians, environmentalists, military officials and power providers.


Most Popular Stories
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Three suspects arrested in shooting death of police officer
  • Station Casinos posts $455 million third-quarter loss
  • Two of three suspects in slaying of officer could face death penalty
  • Man sentenced to 15 years for federal tax crimes
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Las Vegas police shoot at man fleeing after traffic stop
  • Escalator accident at Caesars Palace still under investigation
  • Las Vegas man denied pardon in killing of abusive father
  • Man pleads guilty in death of girlfriend's child
  • Visitors authority urges officials to call off mock nuclear blast
  • Palms agrees to pay $100,000 to settle complaint




  • Two major area power plants representing both ends of the debate took big hits last week.

    Electric utility NV Energy formally withdrew its application through the state Public Utilities Commission to build the Ely Energy Center, a central Nevada plant that would have been one of its biggest generators yet.

    However, company spokesman Mark Severts noted that air permits and land applications for the project remain open through other state and federal agencies for now.

    Also last week, Air Force officials urged the federal government to deny construction of a $700 million solar power plant near the service's Nellis flight-training range, about 175 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

    A Los Angeles company called SolarReserve wants to build the solar station, but Col. Howard "Dave" Belote, Nellis Air Force Base commander, said the plant could interfere with operations at the base's testing range.

    NV Energy officials said in February that they would postpone development of the Ely Energy Center until they could find commercially feasible technology for capturing and storing the carbon dioxide that burning coal releases into the atmosphere.

    Developing and deploying such capabilities could take a decade, company officials said.

    NV Energy notified the Public Utilities Commission of its official application withdrawal on June 15.

    The $5 billion, 1,500-megawatt plant would have generated enough energy to power 900,000 homes. Its first phase was scheduled for completion in 2011.

    NV Energy told the Public Utilities Commission in its application withdrawal that it still planned to build ON Line, a 250-mile transmission network originally slated to be part of the Ely Energy Center.

    ON Line would connect Southern Nevada to renewable energy sources, such as geothermal plants in Northern Nevada. It would also enable NV Energy's subsidiaries in Reno and Las Vegas to share power plants.

    The Ely project proved controversial from the beginning.

    NV Energy proposed the plant in 2006 amid efforts to create more in-state generating power, while at the same time diversifying its fuel base.

    Most of Nevada's power comes from natural gas-fired power plants, and natural gas is notorious for its volatile prices.

    But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and a coalition of environmentalists fought the Ely station from the beginning, decrying the effects they said the coal-fired plant would have on the climate.

    The Public Utilities Commission had authorized NV Energy to spend up to $135 million by February to begin developing the Ely center, but none of those costs are included in the general rate case that goes before the commission for a decision Wednesday.

    In a February article in the Review-Journal, NV Energy Chief Executive Officer Michael Yackira wouldn't say how much the company had spent on the plant, or whether it would ask the commission to raise rates later to compensate the power company for expenses on the project.

    Coal-fired plants aren't the only source of controversy these days.

    In 2007, a Los Angeles firm called SolarReserve proposed the construction of a $700 million solar thermal power plant covering two square miles near Tonopah.

    But Belote said last week that the plan won't fly, and he is urging federal government agencies to turn it down.

    The Air Force's opposition demonstrates some of the conflicts and delays that could lie ahead as renewable-energy projects search for places to put big wind turbines or solar collectors, even in Western states where the federal government is a major landholder.

    SolarReserve has been negotiating with the Air Force for 18 months and already has revised its plans once to move the plant 25 miles away from the test and training range, at the Air Force's suggestion.

    The Nevada plant was supposed to be a showcase for SolarReserve: one of the largest solar plants in the world, using heat-transfer technology developed for space rockets by United Technologies.

    The plant could store 16 hours of power supply, easing concerns about the ability of solar plants to provide power when it's dark or cloudy. It would power about 50,000 homes.

    Belote said in a statement Monday that locating the solar plant near the Nellis range "is incompatible with our vital national security operations." Specifically, it would interfere with radar and ground-based systems for operations involving flight testing, air warfare training and large force exercises.

    Last week, he said the Air Force would tell the Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management to reject the proposal.

    SolarReserve officials "did a lot of (research) with publicly available tools," Belote said. "But when they came back for an official look the answer was, 'Man, that's still too close.' And because of the sensitivity (of information), I can't tell them why. ... Unfortunately for them and us, there's stuff on the Nevada testing range we don't tell anyone about."

    Belote suggested that SolarReserve officials try a site near Mesquite, 75 miles northeast of the base.

    The Air Force has a history of balking at projects near the 2.9-million-acre flighttraining range, which makes up 41 percent of the Air Force's total training acres. The Air Force objected to a wind turbine project at the Nevada Test Site for similar reasons.

    But "we tried to make sure we had a site the Air Force wouldn't object to," Smith said.

    The company's plan would place a lone solar-power tower below a 2,000-foot-tall mountain range.

    SolarReserve has appealed to members of Congress for help.

    Belote has arranged for classified briefings to explain his objections to select Senate staffers, and he has promoted the project to the mayor of Mesquite.

    "Our community is very, very interested in alternative energy and the thought of being green," said Mesquite Mayor Susan Holecheck. "Historically, our economic base has been gaming and tourism."

    Another solar company has proposed a project using similar technology.

    Holecheck said Mesquite officials would have to study whether a SolarReserve site would interfere with plans for moving the town's airport.

    The Bureau of Land Management also would need to agree to provide land.

    Contact reporter Jennifer Robison at jrobison@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-4512.

     

    Review-Journal Keith Rogers contributed to this report. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 13 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Iram wrote on June 23, 2009 11:01 PM: Harry Reid is a selfish, ineffective, fool. Vote him out !


    pat shalmy was the county manager before moving up to enron type money wrote on June 23, 2009 05:56 PM: ............




























    this stinks like clean burning coal money to me.






























    .............


    clean burning green coal wrote on June 23, 2009 05:55 PM:
    oxy mormon

















    woodbury toll roads fix everything






















    perkins id cards solve all nevada resident problems over night.









































    tax payers ignore the back side hammering you have been receiving.




    ............


    As I have been saying.... wrote on June 23, 2009 05:50 PM: Jobs lost at Ely Power Plant –
    $135,000,000 in sunk costs to be passed on to Nevada ratepayers (Very Soon)
    1,600 Construction jobs lost to build the facilities in Ely
    200 Operations jobs lost

    Jobs lost at Yucca Mt- 1,200
    2,500 Construction jobs lost to build the facilities at the Nevada Test Site
    500 Operations Jobs
    (Since Yucca is the law of the land, it still goes forward, but without the Nevada workforce)

    Lost corporate travel business from Obama's anti-Vegas statements - 6 Large Corporate cancellations, and climbing (One hundred million dollars in impact so far).

    Economic Stimulus bill supported by Reid allows the Government to BAN TRIPS TO VEGAS due to excessiveness. As the RJ stated, “ An amendment to the $787 billion economic stimulus bill could have some unpleasant fallout for Las Vegas”

    All travel to Las Vegas from Federal agencies are now under the microscope!
    (This is not the case for San Diego, Miami, New York, or anywhere else)

    Nevada was shortchanged on the crumbs that we did receive from this multi-billion dollar stimulus. Reid was to blame for our misfortune

    Let us not forget what Harry specifically ensured what would NOT be in the bill,,, E-Verify. For those not familiar with it, it helps ensure that only legal U.S. citizens get jobs.

    $1,000,000,000,000.00 in debt to be paid by current taxpayers and their kids

    Harry Reid’s negative impact on Nevada,,,, PRICELESS !!!!

    See-
    A Bad Reid

    Watchin Reid

    Our Country Deserves Better


    Mike K. wrote on June 23, 2009 05:40 PM: On behalf of the workers of Nevada, I want to thank Harry Reid for stopping a project that would have brought many long term jobs to an economically depressed area.

    Next maybe he will save us from ourselves by banning any company from using cars or trucks in the course of conducting their business?


    nv32 wrote on June 23, 2009 05:35 PM: the only reson why NV Energy wont build a coil fire plant in Ely. Is because it doesn't have a big support from Mr. Reid never had it they dont care about any body else but them.


    Pleaseeeee wrote on June 23, 2009 05:33 PM: "In a February article in the Review-Journal, NV Energy Chief Executive Officer Michael Yackira wouldn't say how much the company had actually spent on the plant, or whether it would ask the commission to raise rates later to compensate the power company for expenses on the project."

    Does anyone, in their right mind, expect NV Energy NOT TO ask for these cost through a rate increase?! They would not be responsible to their shareholders if they just said.."No hard feelings,, we will eat these costs."

    Expect to see an increase to cover these costs (plus interest).

    As a few other posters have said.. Thank you Harry Reid.



    A big `thanks' to Harry Reid wrote on June 23, 2009 05:08 PM: The one resource that the United States has plenty of is coal. Other than CO2, it is a relatively clean fuel to burn. Here we are, not using the primary fossil fuel that we have! The only way to generate enough baseload power, for the most part, is through burning coal, oil, natural gas, or through nuclear fission. For those that dream of solar or wind, it is nice but not practical for baseload needs. Unlike water or gas, one cannot store electricity in the amounts needed for baseload purposes. (Try powering your A/C with batteries after inverting 12VDC to 220VAC. (Also, costs are totally prohibitive)).

    Geothermal & hydro work, but is of limited availability.

    It is a shame Harry Reid is against coal and nuclear, as he now puts the United States at a significant disadvantage. For those worried about CO2, I share those concerns, but unless India, Russia, China, and others agree to the same restrictions, we are now in worse shape than before (You think we can’t compete now, just wait for cap and trade).

    The short answer here is that Senator Harry Reid has done Nevada another disservice. Oh, and by the way, we, the Nevada ratepayers, will be paying for the costs associated with the Ely plant. In addition, significant high paying Nevada jobs were lost in the process. Lets remember to `thank’ Harry for this in 2010




    Sunk Costs wrote on June 23, 2009 04:26 PM: To the best of my knowledge there are:

    $135,000,000 in sunk costs to be passed on to Nevada ratepayers.

    In addition Nevada lost out on construction jobs and plant ops jobs.

    (Lets not forget to thank Senator Reid for this)



    Mabel's mommy wrote on June 23, 2009 03:52 PM: This project was definitely listed as part of the rate increase justification. So, no rate increase now? Or was that just a bunch of crap to get more money for the investors? Since people have begun to embrace the need to curb energy use, I'm sure NV Energy is not able to generate the revenue that it has in the past. Yelling in the streets would be appropriate now.


    Read All Comments