Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Breaking News

Friday
Mar 19, 2010
Sunny
Sunny 67° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri

Breaking News


Las Vegas council mandates spaying, neutering of dogs, cats







Most Las Vegas pet owners will be required to spay or neuter their cats and dogs by 4 months of age under an ordinance adopted today to help manage the pet overpopulation problem.

The ordinance garnered the support of local veterinarians and animal rescue groups, who emphasized that not sterilizing animals is irresponsible pet ownership that can lead to rampant reproduction, especially among cats that end up on the streets.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Las Vegas jobless rate hits all-time high of 13.1 percent
  2. Shutting down the Ritz
  3. Shutting down the Ritz
  4. Casino MonteLago to close in March
  5. Casino MonteLago to close in March
  6. Recent rains make Lake Mead's water level rise more than foot
  7. Recent rains make Lake Mead's water level rise more than foot
  8. Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  9. Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  10. Analyst: Las Vegas economy sick with 'jobophilia'

  • MGM partner Pansy Ho found unsuitable by New Jersey gaming authorities
  • Channel 3 files complaint against three Las Vegas television stations
  • Nevada's jobless rate hits 13 percent; state to lose more jobs
  • Ruling may help homeowners trying to avoid foreclosure



  • At the Lied Animal Shelter, the number of impounded dogs has increased 10 percent a year for the past three years, and cat intakes have been up 5 percent annually. The shelter now takes in about 50,000 animals a year and ends up euthanizing half of them because owners or new homes can’t be found.

    “We can’t adopt our way out of the problem,” said Amy Mitchell, a veterinarian at the shelter. “We have to nip the problem in the bud.”

    The measure had its opponents. Criticism included the idea that 4 months is too young to spay or neuter a pet, and that no studies have shown that a mandatory spay-neuter program is effective in reducing unwanted pet populations.

    “I acknowledge that,” said Karen Coyne, head of the city’s detention and enforcement department, which includes animal control. “But I don’t need a study to tell me ... (that) doing nothing qualifies as the definition of insanity.”

    The ordinance states that dogs and cats in the city of Las Vegas must be spayed or neutered by 4 months of age. There are exceptions for people with a breeder’s, animal handler’s or fancier’s permit, and for pets that qualify for a temporary or permanent medical exemption.

    The ordinance is scheduled to take effect April 1. It will be reviewed annually to see if it is effective.

    Council members approved it 5-2 after a lengthy hearing. Lois Tarkanian and Ricki Barlow voted no.

    Tarkanian said that after talking to veterinarians, she thought that 4 months was too young and that she wouldn’t vote for anything that required sterilization under 6 months of age.

    Barlow asked a series of questions about owners who wanted to keep a dog whole to eventually breed it, and the requirements to obtain a breeder’s permit for that purpose. He said the city was walking “a fine line” in requiring people to fix their pets.

    Mayor Oscar Goodman asked some of the same questions but voted for the new law.

    “This is an easy one for me,” he said, citing the high number of animals impounded and euthanized at the shelter. “We’re not going to accept this kind of behavior.”

    The ordinance was pushed as a way to address Southern Nevada’s pet overpopulation. At Lied, which provides shelter services to Las Vegas, North Las Vegas and unincorporated areas of Clark County, 86 percent of the animals taken in are not sterilized, said Director Christine Robinson.

    If owners must sterilize pets at the beginning of their lives, the pets won’t reproduce — especially important if the animal ends up homeless as a runaway or abandoned pet.

    “The way we solve this problem is to reduce these numbers on the front end,” Robinson said.

    North Las Vegas passed a similar ordinance in January 2008, and Clark County is working on one.

    Violating the Las Vegas ordinance would be a misdemeanor.

    Coyne said letters will go out to new pet owners informing them of licensing, vaccination and sterilization requirements, and animal control officers will check compliance when answering calls as part of their regular duties.

    Contact reporter Alan Choate at achoate@reviewjournal.com or 702-229-6435.

     

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Leave Your Comment 37 Reader Comments
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
    Current Word Count:

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    Report abuse

    Brittany wrote on March 19, 2010 08:57 AM: Im a new pet owner myself and personally i think that 4 mo is a little young for my little girl to have to be spayed but anything i can do to comply with the law and rules set forth is just what we all have to do and most importantly its for their health and they will most likely forget about it the younger the are.


    Report abuse

    heather wrote on February 05, 2010 01:39 PM: If the state has a mandatory spay and neuter law, one day therte will be no more dogs or cats. How is that a good thing? Now is the breeders license an outragious amount of money? How do you expect people in this economy to be able to afford it!!!? It seems to me that it would be impossible to enforce this stupid law! It is the most rediculas thing ive ever heard. They will have to drag my dog out of my cold dead hands before they make me spay or nueter any animal i will have in the future.


    Report abuse

    Informed wrote on December 03, 2009 08:42 AM: From a veterinary medical stand point, there is no harm in altering an animal at 4 months of age. The 6 month guide line is arbitrary and most vets recommend 6 months because 'this is the way that it's always been done.' There's no scientific data to support spaying and neutering at 6 months of age. Today's generation of veterinarians are taught, in school, how to perform pediatric spays and neuters starting at 2 months of age or 2 pounds. The only slight disadvantage to neutering cats before 6 months old is that it MAY POSSIBLY lead to an increase in cranial cruciate rupture.


    Report abuse

    justmy2cents wrote on November 19, 2009 07:25 AM: I think this is a good start, but it doesn't go far enough. Until dogs and cats are no longer born only to die, I believe all breeding should stop. This includes the so called "responsible" breeders and the backyard breeders. I never could never understand that if breeders love their animals so much and they see their are so few homes for animals already born, why do they want to bring more animals into an already overpopulated world?


    Report abuse

    Susan wrote on November 19, 2009 02:08 AM: Spaying and neutering is important to the life long health of a dog. Spaying a female before the first estrus reduces the chances of mammary cancer dramatically. The same holds true in the male for testicular cancer. HOWEVER, spay/neuter age MUST be determined by breed. To force spaying and neutering in a slow maturing breeds, especially toy breeds, will cause life long medical problems and many will be lost to complications from anesthesia.

    This ordinance is not well thought out. Whoever proposed this should have contacted all the national breed clubs for professional recommendations. Asking a few local veterinarians for their opinions when they've probably never seen more than two dozen of the more than two hundred and fifty AKC accepted breeds is an ignorant and provincial thing to do. Much like thinking a general practitioner can perform neurosurgery because he's a doctor. To me, this mandate is as outrageous as the new guidelines for detecting breast cancer in woman.


    Report abuse

    MrM wrote on November 18, 2009 10:13 PM: Another law that will not be enforced.


    Report abuse

    Responsible Pet Owner wrote on November 18, 2009 10:08 PM: I got both of my dogs neutered at the age that our vet recommended, 6 months. He did not want to do it sooner because their growth plates are not completely developed. I would be for this ordinance if it was required at 6 months of age. As a responsible dog owner, I feel like my rights are being infringed on. I should be the one to decide when my dogs' get spayed or neutered. It is ridiculous to have to pay for a breeders license just so that my dogs can have the procedures done at a healthier age, 6 months. What's next, they tell us how to raise our children? Oh wait a minute...Remember that if you give an inch, they might just take a mile.


    Report abuse

    This is wrong wrote on November 18, 2009 09:58 PM: This is wrong on so many levels. I can see both sides and can agree with the reasoning behind these actions. But as for me and my dog I find this a blatant invasion of my life. I'm a responsible pet owner and always have been, so what's next, the city and county telling us how many pets a homeowner can have? Oh wait, I just gave them an idea.


    Report abuse

    Mr. B wrote on November 18, 2009 09:38 PM: Why does the government (local, state and national) think their power is endless?

    I understand the need to control pet overpopulation. But to step in and make some new law that impedes the individual rights of citizens is not the answer.

    Our government is out of control and needs to be stopped. The bureaucrats think they can enact whatever laws they want. Their power has no checks anymore.

    There are tons of examples, such as different jurisdictions putting up red light cameras or speed limit cameras and sending a ticket to the registered owner. They bypass the laws of due process by making it a "civil violation" rather than a matter for criminal courts.

    Or how about California enacting a law that makes kids required to wear a helmet if they ride an unmotorized scooter or skateboard?

    Or how about the Federal government taking tax dollars from the people, allocating them for highway repairs but then placing conditions on the states on what their speed limit laws must be or what their DUI laws must be or they are disqualified from getting any of the money. Who's money was it to begin with?


    Report abuse

    MysterMr wrote on November 18, 2009 09:12 PM: "They should also consider spaying and neutering many of the two legged variety in Las Vegas as well."

    - AMEN TO THAT. BREEDERS EVERYWHERE!


    Read All Comments