Las Vegas News, Sports, Business, Entertainment and Classifieds

Las Vegas Review-Journal - Breaking News

Thursday
Sep 9, 2010
Partly Cloudy
Partly Cloudy 76° Weather Forecast

RECENT EDITIONS
Fri Sat Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu

sponsored by
Breaking News


Personhood petition would outlaw pills that induce abortion

CARSON CITY — The leader of a Nevada organization that wants to outlaw abortion acknowledged today that passage of its Parenthood amendment would prohibit women from using pills that induce abortion.

Olaf Vancura, president of Personhood Nevada, said any birth control pill or other forms of contraception that end pregnancies or destroy “newly formed life” would be outlawed if voters approve the proposed constitutional amendment.


Most Popular Stories
  1. Recent rains make Lake Mead's water level rise more than foot
  2. Recent rains make Lake Mead's water level rise more than foot
  3. 30,000-square-foot supermarket opens at Korea Town Plaza
  4. Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  5. Rental housing prices down 8.2 percent in Las Vegas
  6. Analyst: Las Vegas economy sick with 'jobophilia'
  7. Nevada's jobless rate hits 13 percent; state to lose more jobs
  8. New UNLV football coach agrees to three-year contract
  9. New UNLV football coach agrees to three-year contract
  10. Amazon to open North Las Vegas distribution center; warehouse to bring 350 new jobs

  • Unwin hired as leader of Cosmopolitan resort
  • Las Vegas housing market still looking gloomy, analyst says
  • Titus apologizes to Reid for remark



  • Birth control designed to prevent a pregnancy before one occurs would not be prohibited, he said.

    “It is really very simple,” said Vancura, who described himself as a scientist with a doctorate in physics. “Our amendment is about life and the right to life. Forms of birth control that do not cause an abortion would not be prohibited. With an abortion, someone dies.”

    Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada filed a lawsuit Thursday in Carson City District Court challenging the language in the Personhood amendment as being vague and deceptive. A date for a hearing has not yet been set.

    The proposed amendment’s language does not use the terms abortion or birth control. It states that a “person” is a human being from the moment of biological development and that persons are entitled to due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.

    In coming days, Vancura intends to post on the personhoodnevada.com Web site a list showing acceptable and unacceptable forms of birth control.

    Until today, no one from Personhood Nevada had acknowledged that some forms of birth control would be prohibited.

    However, the ACLU last week pointed out that the proposed amendment would prohibit some types of birth control and outlaw abortions even in the case of rape or incest.

    Elisa Maser, legislative lobbyist for Planned Parenthood, said Vancura’s admission that birth control would be limited shows how radical the proposed amendment really is.

    “This is an incredibly sweeping and drastic measure,” Maser said. “They need to tell folks how far they will go into their private lives.”

    The RU486 (Mifeprex or Mifepristone) pill is meant to induce abortion, Maser said. But the so-called “morning-after pill” is a form of emergency contraception that does not necessarily induce an abortion because the woman does not know if she is pregnant, she said.

    A morning-after pill is a high-dose birth control pill that is used in cases where a woman might have had unprotected sex, or “if the condom broke, if you will,” Maser said.

    The most common emergency contraception pills are called Preven and Plan B. They are birth control pills containing progesterone, estrogen or a combination of both.

    However, some anti-abortion activists maintain that the pill and IUDs, or intrauterine devices, not only prevent pregnancies, but also induce abortions.

    “Ninety-eight percent of all women use contraception at some time in their lives,” Maser said. “We aren’t trying to use scare tactics. But now they (Personhood Nevada) are saying what they intend to accomplish.”

    The Parenthood USA organization has acknowledged that under the proposed amendment, abortion would not be allowed in any case.

    Parenthood USA, a Christian organization, is a national drive in 31 states to pass amendments or laws in an effort to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision allowing abortion.

    Since 1973, 50 million abortions have been conducted in the United States, according to Keith Mason, PersonhoodUSA co-founder.

    Before the Nevada Personhood amendment can become law, organizers need to gather 97,002 valid signatures by Aug. 4, and the amendment must be approved by voters on the 2010 and 2012 election ballots.

    Vancura said he is not a medical doctor and wants a dialogue from residents about what are and what are not acceptable birth control methods.

    But he said RU486 and emergency contraception pills clearly cause abortions and should be outlawed.

    Vancura said opponents will try to obfuscate the issue by noting the amendment would stop abortions in cases of rape or incest. But he said life begins at the moment of conception.

    He said that over the years, life has been “devalued” in the United States.

    “Today rational people must agree that life begins at conception,” Vancura said. “This is a civil rights issue. The government should not pressure people to die, or young people to have abortions. The right to life is fundamental.”

    Maser said it cannot be determined scientifically when life begins inside a woman’s body.

    “You can tell it in a lab, in a petri dish, but not in the woman’s body,” she said.

    Richard Ziser, a longtime Las Vegas conservative activist and Personhood Nevada’s campaign manager, announced the petition drive on Oct. 21.

    Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.

    Newsvine Digg Fark Technorati reddit StumbleUpon del.icio.us Slashdot Propeller Mixx Furl Twitter MySpace Facebook Google Bookmarks Yahoo! Bookmarks Windows Live Favorites Ask MyStuff myAOL Favorites

    Comments (11)

    Share your thoughts on this story.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

    Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

    X

    Register to comment

    * Indicates fields that are required
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    Male Female

    Already registered? Log in now

    X

    Already registered to comment?

    Log in below
    E-mail
    Password

    Forgot your password? | Register
    X

    Forgot your password?

    Enter your e-mail address below and a password will be resent to you.

    Email
    Terms & Conditions
    The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.

    Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

    Report abuse

    Christopher wrote on November 17, 2009 12:45 AM: This is silly. There is no way this will ever make it out of committee and it's ridiculous that these right wing extremists keep trying to force their religion down others' throats and waste taxpayers money to try and usurp what the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on 36 years ago.


    Report abuse

    Pink Elephant wrote on November 16, 2009 10:18 PM: obama is for abortions so he will make this pill legal in every state in our country. You voted for it so now you have to live with it.


    Report abuse

    kristie wrote on November 16, 2009 10:14 PM:
    This would be a non-issue if men got pregnant,,,you would probably not only have all kinds of manner of legal abortions available, but you would probably also have tons of how "not to be pregnant" options....


    Report abuse

    Drew wrote on November 16, 2009 10:05 PM: Good thing Mexico is so close. Not only can you get an abortion there, but it's slot more likely the 'mother' would die from a complication/infection/etc. Pro-lifers, does that seem to support your agenda of protecting life? Didn't think so. Then there are the people that will just do an at home abortion. Probably not a safe alternative.


    Report abuse

    Notice how these are wrote on November 16, 2009 10:03 PM: Notice how these are MEN issuing these decrees as if their Mormon Elders.

    It is astonishing to me that this is almost 2010 and we have to LEGALLY deal with these Religious NUTS called MEN.

    Astonishing.


    Report abuse

    Waitaminute wrote on November 16, 2009 09:41 PM: I agree Tim. They will fight the mother tooth and nail while she is pregnant and claim to "represent" the unborn, but after the baby is born, they forget about both of them. That proves it's a political agenda, not a social one.


    Report abuse

    Brent.Miley wrote on November 16, 2009 09:23 PM: exactly Tim.


    Report abuse

    Native Nevadian wrote on November 16, 2009 09:21 PM: Simple.......against abortion don't have one.


    Report abuse

    Annoyed wrote on November 16, 2009 08:44 PM: If life begins at conception, then the child of any tourist that gets pregnant is now an American citizen with this reasoning?! Give me a break!


    Report abuse

    Bobby.Gladd wrote on November 16, 2009 08:35 PM: Dispositive refutation of this arrogant narcissistic stupidity:

    http://bgladd.blogspot.com/2008/04/diploid-dave-et-al.html

    Olaf, Ziser, Vancura, and the rest of you clowns, I am on your case.


    Read More Comments