Comments (43) | Add a comment
State revenue shortfall $881 million, lawmakers told
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL CAPITAL BUREAU
CARSON CITY — It's official. The state government revenue shortfall that legislators and the governor must eliminate through spending cuts later this month is $881 million.
State Budget Director Andrew Clinger said today that the shortfall has been formally calculated at $881.4 million, which would necessitate a 20.2 percent cut in state spending between March and June 30, 2011.
But Clinger said not all cuts can be implemented by March, which means even a higher percentage in cuts will be required to reach the required level.
He told members of the Legislature's Interim Finance Committee that the state will fall $707 million in the red by June 30, 2011, the end of the state's two-year budget period, if nothing is done. By law, Nevada's budget must be balanced, and also include at least a 5 percent reserve.
Gov. Jim Gibbons on Monday will deliver a televised speech in which he will outline his plans to cover the shortfall. At that time he will announce when he will convene the Legislature into a special session at which legislators will approve spending cuts. That special session is expected the week of Feb. 15.
Legislators so far have not said where they want to reduce spending. They are scheduled to meet with Gibbons' staff later today, when they will be given the governor's proposed list of cuts.
So far, Gibbons has announced publicly he will support no more than a 6 percent cut in state employee salaries, a 10 percent reduction in public education spending, and layoffs of 300 state employees. He also wants to temporarily suspend collective bargaining rights for school employees and to close the Nevada State Prison in Carson City.
During today's Interim Finance meeting, Jeremy Aguero, a principal for Applied Analysis, and Steve Holloway, of Associated General Contractors, expressed concern that further layoffs in the construction industry might result if local governments do not spend already collected revenue for building projects.
Aguero said $4.2 billion is available in Clark County for construction of schools, roads, sewer and water facilities and expansion of McCarran International Airport. Some of these funds come from voter-approved bond issues.
He said one construction job is lost for each $115,000 in revenue that remains unspent.
"Not using it could inhibit our ability to recover as a state," Aguero said.
There has been speculation that the state or local governments will take this construction money to cover their current operating deficits. Gibbons said earlier this week he would not seek to raid these funds.
"I am not looking to steal it," said state Sen. Randolph Townsend, R-Reno. "But why is $4 billion in available funding for construction projects not being used?"
Some of the funds will be spent in coming months as work continues on projects such as the new terminal at McCarran, Aguero said.
"We need to get these projects out to bid to private construction companies and create jobs," Holloway said.
Contact Capital Bureau Chief Ed Vogel at evogel@reviewjournal.com or 775-687-3901.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Nevada Could have had a surplus, not a deficit of $881 Million dollars! If Nevada would have allowed Yucca Mountain to actually complete on time, which ironically would have been this year 2010, there would have been a surplus of $$$ from all the other states who would have been sending us all their Spent Nuclear Fuel! It is not "Waste", by the way, and it is not a "Dump". These are words from pinky=Harry Reid to confuse the public about what "Spent Nuclear Fuel" really is! Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel is SAFE and does not come anywhere close to being as dangerous as politicians and fear mongers want you to believe. Get the facts and wise up people!! Watch this video for a little straight up dose of the TRUTH!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZP2oG0n4NLc
Wow the tin foil hat crowd is out in force. Blockade Nellis? Back in 1861 someone tried to do that with Fort Sumter and see how that worked out for them. Abolish public education? Yeah, so American's can do menial physiscal work for $2 a day like the Chinese. That's progress.