News

Breeders, pet fanciers targeted in revamp of animal control rules

By SCOTT WYLAND
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Posted: Jun. 1, 2010 | 5:58 p.m.

Clark County animal control rules are about to undergo their most substantial changes in two decades.

Some revisions will affect all pet owners in unincorporated areas, while others will target animal breeders and "pet fanciers" who own several cats or dogs.

Commissioners on Tuesday mostly agreed with the changes proposed by the county animal advisory committee and asked that the amended ordinance be brought back later this month for a vote.

Some of the updates reflect the county's new pet sterilization rules that went into effect in May as well as newer technologies, such as microchip implants used to return lost pets to owners.

And some are designed to better protect animals from abuse and reduce the number of strays that are euthanized.

"Just updating the Title 10 (code) so it's much more user-friendly and complies with state law will make it easier for animal control and, I believe, we will kill less pets as a result," said Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani, who sponsored the code changes.

The proposed changes include:

■ Those who fail to sterilize a cat or dog will be fined $225 for the first offense, $350 for a second offense and $500 for subsequent offenses. If the owners come into compliance, the fines will be reduced to $25. Money from the fines will go into a special fund to aid in the sterilization of pets.

■ Owners have three days to retrieve a pet from a shelter and must show proof of ownership through veterinary records or photographs. If they lack proof, they have 24 hours to obtain it before the animal is pegged again for euthanization. The animal also must be sterilized and a microchip implanted before it is released.

■ Breeders are limited to eight purebred cats and dogs and must get a special permit, with a yearly fee of $50.

■ A pet fancier permit, which costs $50 a year, is required for anyone to own more than three dogs or cats. The limit is six dogs and 10 cats.

■ Pets must be kept in areas that are no colder than 50 degrees or no hotter than 85 degrees.

■ Animals cannot be tethered for more than 14 hours, and the line must be at least 12 feet long.

■ A motorist who accidentally hits a domestic animal is no longer required to stay with the injured creature until help arrives.

■ Owners are not allowed to buy, sell, breed or keep animals for fighting. Watching animal fights also is forbidden.

Animal welfare advocates had a few quibbles but generally backed the new rules.

Gina Greisen, president of Nevada Voters for Animals, called the revamped rules a crucial first step.

"This is fantastic. We've worked hard on this," Greisen said. "But until we stop killing 30,000 animals, more needs to be done."

Greisen was referring to the estimated number of cats and dogs euthanized in the Las Vegas Valley last year.

She disagreed with abolishing the rule that compels drivers to stay with animals they hit. A driver should take some responsibility, even if it's calling animal control, she said.

Restricting breeders to eight animals is probably the most stringent limit in the country, said Beverly McGrath, the National Humane Society's state director.

Many states have no limits, and some put the cap at 50 animals, McGrath said.

Commissioner Susan Brager expressed concern about a pet possibly getting euthanized because a person couldn't confirm ownership in 24 hours.

Christine Robinson, Lied Animal Shelter's executive director, said that isn't likely to happen. The shelter's staff would rather give a person the benefit of the doubt than euthanize an animal, she said.

The code changes are the result of divergent groups collaborating, said Holly Staburski, an animal advisory committee member.

"To have breeders working with animal rescue -- that would have been unheard of a few years ago," Staburski said.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. THMeeks Jun. 2, 2010 | 12:38 p.m. Report Abuse

    Brager is right to be concerned. People must have forgotten about Puddles the cat, who Lied euthanized last year right after his owner ID'd him--Puddles' senior citizen citizen owner went home to get the necessary paperwork and her feline companion was dead when she returned: http://vegas-girl.blogspot.com/2009/04/puddles-and-pet-palooza.html

  2. Native Born Las Vegan Jun. 2, 2010 | 9:54 a.m. Report Abuse

    So now they are saying that we have to microchip our animals too? I always have my animals fixed as soon as they are old enough. But microchips?

Friday, May 25, 2012
Overcast Overcast, 80° Weather Forecast