Comments (30) | Add a comment
Civil rights inquiry of police shootings on hold
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Feb. 8, 2012 | 8:23 a.m.
Federal authorities will wait and see how the Metropolitan Police Department responds to a review of its officer-involved shootings before deciding whether to open a civil rights investigation into the agency, two civil rights groups were told Tuesday.
The letter from the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division was a disappointment to the two groups, which requested the investigation after a Review-Journal series about police shootings and after the police shooting death of an unarmed, disabled war veteran late last year.
"That's not the response we were expecting," said Allen Lichtenstein, general counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada. "We were expecting them to take our request seriously."
A formal decision about whether to investigate could be months away and could hinge on the findings of a separate, voluntary federal review of Las Vegas police shootings, policies and procedures, according to the letter by the chief of the Civil Rights Division's Special Litigation Section.
A Las Vegas police spokesman said the department looked forward to working with the officials conducting the review, but he would not comment further.
The decision is likely a relief for department officials. A civil rights investigation into systemic civil rights abuses is far different from the voluntary review announced last week by Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie.
The Civil Rights Division can mandate reforms, sometimes through a consent decree. The team doing the review, a separate Justice Department arm called the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), can't.
Lichtenstein called the letter "totally inadequate."
"They did not talk to us. They did not consult with us," he said, adding, "I would have expected something that sounded less like a press release."
Although the COPS review could be worthwhile, he said it was not the sort of independent investigation requested by his organization or by the Las Vegas chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.
"It doesn't strike me as the type of thing that is really designed to give the public confidence that real change is going to be made," Lichtenstein said.
Both groups plan to hold a news conference about the subject today. .
The COPS review, which is expected to take at least six months, came about in November, on the second day of a five-part Review-Journal series highlighting how Las Vegas police shot at people more often than other departments did and how police were reluctant to learn from their shootings and hold officers accountable for mistakes.
The head of the COPS office called Gillespie and suggested his team come out and review Las Vegas police policies and procedures. The COPS office had never done such a thorough review of a department and was looking to start somewhere, the COPS director said last week.
At the end of the review, the COPS office will issue a public report that could include recommendations and areas for improvement. The study also might be used as a clearinghouse of "best practices" that other departments can use.
But the review will be contingent upon what kind of access the COPS researchers can get from the Metropolitan Police Department -- and what the department wants them to study. COPS Director Bernard Melekian said last week that had not been decided.
Other groups, such as the Police Executive Research Forum, have done large-scale studies of police use of deadly force. Sometimes the studies require access to sensitive information, such as officer discipline files, that only the department can provide.
In the letter, the Civil Rights Division said it will "monitor" the Metropolitan Police Department's participation in the program. It also is still reviewing the request by the ACLU of Nevada and the Las Vegas NAACP.
Contact Lawrence Mower at lmower@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0440.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
We are too soft on criminals
Feds should do something about Illegals.
To my fellow bloggers;
Having the DOJ hand this inquiry over to a watered down lower level advisory committee is at best disappointing. I guess the wheeling and the dealing between the DOJ (The one's with the real muscle) and the Police Department behind closed doors, went well and the end result is now to try and satisfy the public with this "mamby pamby" consolation of "COPS" distantly overseeing the use of force issue. Nevada still sets the standard for political corruption. Just an old veteran cop reflecting,
Gordon Martines
CURRE.ORG
This is what happens when you have a republican in the white house!!
What? ...... oh ok I'm sure the DOJ has good reasons for foregoing their investigation. Carry on, obama 2012 etc. etc.
Not surprising. Residents of Nevada and Clark County are just settlers on the outskirts of Federal land. Nevada is a state owned by the Federal government--approx. 87%. However, the USDJ CRD as all law enforcement investigative/prosecutorial agencies do these days is to "reach for the lowest hanging fruit" (e.g. recent story of medical doctor wearing a wire for years in a "fishing expedition" to coordinate a fairly petty bribery offense). The the gravity and historical implications of the issue(s) is simply far too complex for the agency; coupled with a cozy relationship between the local office and the parties at issue. Truly, what do we expect in Las Vegas and Clark County.
This is only my guess. I think they are waiting to see next cop shootings I think they figured out they don't have to wait too long. Shootings - May be 2 or 3. That will be only 14 or 21 bullets by Metro.
oh come on the government investigating it's own. can't believe he was disappointed about this discision,it's typical.
I guess the police haven't killed enough civilians yet to warrant an investigation. I wonder how many innocent civilians need to get shot, or how many millions the local governments have to pay out, before someone does something ab out this cluster #*@% masquerading as a competent police force. (Including those keystone cop killers of ice cream ladies and molesters of children in Henderson).
So Jack why did you change your screen name? Did you get banned for your anti-semitic comments?
Dingy Harry prolly made a call so as not to upset the new city attorney in Henderson.