Comments (19) | Add a comment
John L. Smith
Clash between Vermillion and Sisolak will injure all involved
Tools
More Columns
More Blogs
Updated: Jan. 24, 2012 | 8:24 a.m.
Like watching a head-on collision in slow motion, the nasty fight between Clark County Commissioner Steve Sisolak and former girlfriend ex-Henderson City Councilwoman Kathleen Vermillion makes the weak of stomach wince.
The crunch of metal has only begun to ring out. You can see the worst happening before your eyes, and it's too late to avert disaster.
As the founder in 2000 of the Nevada Partnership for Homeless Youth, in recent years Vermillion enjoyed a sparkling public profile that helped lead to political office.
That came to an abrupt halt a few months ago when she resigned her Henderson council seat -- supposedly to spend more time with her charity and her teenage children -- and then watched as its interim executive director filed a complaint with the state against her, alleging misuse of the charity's funds.
Vermillion on Thursday filed a lawsuit against Sisolak claiming he had disclosed her confidential health records, which included drug test results that appeared to show she had tested positive for the synthetic opiate methadone. She also alleged that, "after the breakup, Sisolak attempted to carry on improper and secretive relationships with Vermillion's family including her minor daughter."
That creepy-sounding last part, of course, is what threatens to maim Sisolak's political career.
Cut to a meeting Sunday afternoon at the downtown office of public relations manager Mark Fierro, who was retained by Vermillion's attorney Robert Martin. The meeting was attended by Fierro, Martin, Sisolak and attorney Stanley Hunterton.
Vermillion's side describes the meeting as an attempt to settle the lawsuit before the crash of negative publicity and potentially damning evidence started circulating in public. Sisolak calls it an attempt to extort $3.9 million from him or face a vicious campaign that might cripple his credibility.
"I will not be blackmailed," Sisolak told reporters Monday as he announced he had filed a police report alleging extortion against Vermillion, Martin and Fierro.
No, but he was willing to listen to Martin's offer, and in the meeting, he was reminded by Fierro that the Clark County firefighters who loathe the commissioner did not yet have their hands on potentially devastating material. Fierro represents the firefighters union and said Monday he made it clear to Sisolak that the labor group wasn't behind the commissioner's troubles.
By Monday afternoon, Vermillion was returning fire through her representatives with a news conference at Martin's office that featured an edited version of the two-hour interview recently conducted with her 15-year-old daughter.
Among the girl's allegations: That Sisolak took the teenager shopping at Victoria's Secret and shopping for a bikini; that he engaged in late-night texts, took her on a "movie date" and talked about giving her some of the expensive jewelry he had gifted her mother in happier times; and that he sent the teen a gift card worth hundreds of dollars after the couple had broken up. In the interview, the girl calls the contact "weird," and adds, "I can't believe I was just, like, OK, and went along with it."
Weird is one way to describe it. Sleazy is another way.
Or was this something innocent that has been twisted out of proportion by a former girlfriend through her able advocates?
Even attorney Martin admits, "We're not alleging that there's criminal conduct here." He then quickly adds, "I think what I can certainly say is we believe the allegations in the complaint can and will be proven."
The texts between Sisolak and the teenager might help clarify the picture. Some texts between Sisolak and Vermillion have already surfaced.
The extortion complaint would seem more difficult to establish -- unless, of course, that Sunday meeting was recorded. Call me curious.
What it all adds up to remains to be seen. For now, there are two certainties.
One, by anyone's measure the Vermillion-Sisolak relationship has gone irreparably cold.
And, two, no one associated with this twisted wreck will walk away unscathed.
John L. Smith's column appears Sunday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Email him at Smith@reviewjournal.com or call 702-383-0295. He also blogs at lvrj.com/blogs/smith.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Oh, come on people! It's obvious that the video of Ms. Vermillion's daughter was spliced and didn't include whole answers. The girl's own father even said much was left out. This is simply Ms. Vermillion's sorry attempt to get the media's attention off of her drug use and theft and blatant disregard for anything and anyone but herself! I just hope her daughter and everyone else manipulated and left in the wake of her unstable selfishness can survive the damage she's caused.
Jaded, or stupid, whatever name you prefer. Sisolak is worth millions. He was awarded a $24 million dollar "settlement" by the same commission he now sits on. Hows that for being extorted?
A homeowner or liablilty policy will cover cover a slander or defamation lawsuit. But it is diffucult to prove defamation or slander since the plaintiff has to prove that she sustained economic damages as a result of the said defamation, which is difficult to prove. She has no chance of collecting any money unless his insurance company decides to settle it instead of fighting the case. Either way there is something fishy about the grant given by the County, which needs to be investigated for any impropriety.
J51: you make some good points... I'm not really a fan of Sisolak, but he didn't start this mess, in fact, I think he tried to stay out of it until she dragged him in... which seems to be her intent: make him look bad and take the heat off her being exposed as a thief fueling a drug habit.
I'm sad for both her children, first she throws her son under the bus when she resigned, now she in affect is pimping out her daughter... charming woman!
But homeless youth have the most to lose here; along with small non-profits all over town.
I just don't understand where Vermillion and her attorey think he's going to get almost $4 million. What does he make as a commissioner? About $150k a year? Do they expect him to steal it from the taypayers????
"Classic" Las Vegas character assassination...Sisolak did not act improperly with teenagers who were friends with his own daughters during dozens of visits during their high school years - there is a motive for this story!
Fierro and the Fire Heroes have not yet begun to slander and intimidate. Why do voters listen to these Union thugs.
Sisolak is doing exactly the right thing by going on the offensive immediately following a false accusation. In 1991, my female mayoral opponent also made a false and defamatory accusation against me. I foolishly waited until after I lost the election to take action against her. My lawsuit took 10 years to make it to the Nevada Supreme Court where a 19 page Decision was rendered stating she "acted with actual malice," and with "a reckless disregard for the truth." Though my name was cleared, it meant nothing because of the permanent damage from a decade earlier. Here is the Decision: http://stevemiller4lasvegas.com/supreme1.html
My case set the legal precedent for any defamation action Sisolak may seek.
Both are dud. It is obvious, that she was into fulltime swindling the money for her drug habits and the big question is-did Sisolak had anything to to with this grant? even though he allegedly abstained from the vote. If her allegations are true, texting a minor girl (while he was dating her or not) is improper for a proper adult male. The texts (if released) will probably show his real intentions and motive, even though, texting a minor girl per se might not be criminal. This woman should spend time in jail. He should resign or not hold any public office.
Yuck and the smell from politicians continues to permeate the air in Las Vegas and disgustingly adding children only makes the air they permeate more foul. The air here pretty much is equal or close to surpassing Chicago, what a horrible smell.