Comments (10) | Add a comment
Commissioners reject putting minority communities in specific districts
-
Jose Solorio, a Hispanic community advocate, said he was disappointed with the outcome.
Tools
More Photos
-
Yvette Williams, head of the local Democratic Black Caucus, spoke before the Clark County Commission on Tuesday.
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Updated: Aug. 17, 2011 | 8:38 a.m.
Clark County commissioners Tuesday chose a final map for commission voting districts that will protect their seats, rejecting minority leaders' efforts to put African-American and Hispanic communities in specific districts.
A couple dozen minority leaders, residents and two assemblymen testified, many of them in favor of a map known as "D" that would have created districts with large black and Hispanic areas.
Local Hispanic and black caucuses hoped to coalesce as many minority voters as possible to increase their power to elect leaders they prefer, including minority candidates.
But commissioners unanimously chose a map labeled "C" that they said will balance the interests of minorities and commissioners in future elections.
Jose Solorio, a Hispanic community advocate, said he was disappointed with the outcome.
"I think the commissioners were more interested in how it affected them personally rather than how it affected the community as a whole," Solorio said. "I'm going to look into it further. It just doesn't feel right."
Solorio said he doubts that the map the commissioners chose complies with federal redistricting laws that forbid splitting a minority community, adding he might pursue a legal challenge if he determines he has strong enough grounds.
Boundaries are adjusted every 10 years after a U.S. census count to spread population changes as evenly as possible through congressional, state and local voting districts.
Some commissioners must pick up 50,000 to 80,000 residents, while others must shed a similar number because of differences in district population growth.
Minority leaders contend that ethnic communities have grown and must be taken into consideration.
In the past decade, the county's Hispanic population swelled to about 569,000 from 302,000, and the African-American population increased to 204,000 from 125,000, according to census data.
Commissioners, all Democrats, have expressed concerns about not only ensuring that their new districts are solidly blue but that they don't lose too many of the voters who elected them.
Several commissioners said they thought Map C meets that goal.
Solorio and other Hispanic advocates wanted a sprawling area stretching from Craig Road to south of Charleston Boulevard to be in Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani's district.
Some black leaders wanted a large area north of Craig Road, which has had a heavy African-American influx in recent years, to be in Commissioner Lawrence Weekly's district.
But Weekly opposed that plan, saying he would pick up more than 200,000 residents who were not in his district in the last election.
Weekly also would have had to relinquish the downtown corridor, something he refused to do.
"That's too extreme," Weekly said of the boundary changes.
Yvette Williams, head of the local Democratic Black Caucus, said she would have liked the borders on Weekly's district to be extended farther north.
But Williams also is glad that Weekly won't lose the historic black district to the west, as Map D would have done.
Not all Hispanic leaders supported Map D.
Vicenta Montoya, chairwoman of the Si Se Pueda Latino Democratic Caucus, indicated that after initially trumpeting Map D, she now preferred Map C, partly because it will protect commissioners' seats. "Chris Giunchigliani and Lawrence Weekly will continue to represent constituents they've represented," Montoya said.
Commissioner Tom Collins said safeguarding Democratic districts will be good for minorities, not just commissioners.
"Every citizen will benefit from having a good representative," Collins said.
Contact reporter Scott Wyland at swyland@reviewjournal.com or 702-455-4519.
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
The ignorance demonstrated on this board is enormous. The 1964 Voting Rights Act permits the creation of a minority majority district when population levels reach levels that support such a district. Latinos were the driving engine for growth and which allowed for one additional Congressional representative. Latinos in the NE area constitute almost 65-68% of that area. Commissioner Lawrence Weekly presently has more than 51% Latinos in his district. District E in map D represents more than 160,000 Latinos. Redistricting occurs at all levels of government-Congressional, Commission, City Council, School Districts.
Because a Minority district can be created in Clark County
without any jerrymandering it must. That is the law. If you don't like that change the law. Districts A B C F G have districts that are 70% or higher white districts. That's just how the population is distributed. I support map C as a fair, equitable and lawful distribution of the population of Clark County.
"Commissioner Tom Collins said safeguarding Democratic districts will be good for minorities, not just commissioners". Translation = If you are a minority you WILL vote democratic. You have no choice. Which minority does not want to vote for a goofball in a cowboy hat?
Minorities want access to everything, but don't want to have to assimilate. They want their own subcultures, and their own Neighborhoods and Businesses. Their own Chamber of Commerce, and their own Commissoners. The Businesses usually fail, and the predoninate Minority neighborhoods (Districts) are where all the crime is usually concentrated. Shootings, Home Break-ins, Car Jackings, and Convenience Store Robberies, Neighborhood Drug Dealers, and Drop Houses, and Domestic Disturbances. Not just HERE, but, EVERY city. The state recently moved minorities out of the projects and into subsidised Section 8 homes in nice neighborhoods all over the valley. Now, EVERY neighborhood can enjoy Grafitti, more crime, Barking Pitbulls, Drug Houses, Drop Houses, and Dumbed Down schools with new high failure rates, new high truancy rates, and new high Drop-out rates. That's the White Man's Burden.
This is America, not Mexico! Talk about infiltration, bought time for a revolution!
I recommend a new District called Mexico!
Can we see the map?
Social engineering morons. How about we just establish quotas for each neighborhood. You down there on Elm Street...bub....you have to move...too many whiteys on the block.
Wow....Im having segregation flashbacks. I thought we were moving on from racial segregation???
The commissioners chose a map they said will balance the interests of minorities. This is most likely true since the minority in at least one of the commissioners district is white. LOL
The Clark County Commissioners best do their homework. Hispanics are no longer the minority in many of the voting districts in Clark County. Whites are the minority. Where are the rights of whites as a minority???????