Comments (4) | Add a comment
County, North Las Vegas fight over sewage
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Clark County and North Las Vegas may one day agree on a place for the city to release its treated wastewater, but the two sides have a little more bad blood to discharge first.
County commissioners and North Las Vegas officials sparred once again Tuesday over the city's request to flush treated sewage from a city treatment plant into an open, county-owned flood control channel.
Without the channel, wastewater from the new $285 million facility essentially has no place to go.
After criticizing city officials for building the plant and other past decisions, the commissioners voted to table the matter until July 5 in hopes that a solution can be reached.
But the two sides didn't seem much closer to an agreement than they did at previous meetings.
Commissioner Chris Giunchigliani was especially harsh, arguing that the county would only be "reinforcing bad behavior" if it were to help North Las Vegas out of its bind.
City Councilwoman Anita Wood said it was time for the county and the city to put away the past and work together on a solution.
To show that North Las Vegas is negotiating in good faith on Sloan Channel, the city has offered to end several other unrelated but long-simmering disputes with the county.
Several commissioners said the specifics of that offer sounded more like the city trying to leverage the county.
"There's not been any good faith as far as I've seen, and I've been a resident of North Las Vegas for half my life," Commissioner Tom Collins said.
The entities also could wind up facing off in court.
In the meantime, their battle continues to delay action to dissolve the Clean Water Coalition, the regional agency formed in 2002 to build a $800 million wastewater pipeline to Lake Mead.
Work on the pipeline project was suspended in December 2009, but the coalition has endured and, until recently, continued to collect fees from valley sewer customers.
It takes a unanimous vote from the coalition's four-member board to dismantle the entity, but North Las Vegas City Councilman Robert Eliason has blocked the breakup.
His latest no vote came immediately after Tuesday's commission meeting.
Wood said Eliason is simply following the advice of the city's legal counsel.
Giunchigliani called it "repugnant that someone's holding out a vote that's good for the public for a political purpose."
In any event, the Clean Water Coalition will live on for another month or so as the county and the city try to work out their differences.
The coalition board is scheduled to meet June 16 to approve a state-mandated budget for the coming fiscal year, which starts July 1.
The board plans to wait until after the July 5 commission meeting to vote again on dissolving the coalition, distributing the money it has collected over the years and terminating the pipeline project .
But the dismantling is already well under way. The coalition's records have been turned over to the Clark County Water Reclamation District for safekeeping and the agency's furniture and office supplies will be sold off at an auction today. When its lease runs out June 30, the coalition no longer will have an office at all.
"For all intents and purposes, the CWC is over," said board member and Las Vegas City Councilman Steve Ross. "It's just a matter of taking the right steps to get there."
One major task that remains is returning the roughly $65 million the coalition still has in the bank.
On May 26, the Nevada Supreme Court blocked an attempt by state lawmakers to sweep all but about $3 million from the coalition's coffers.
The plan now, pending board approval, is to give that money back to the coalition's member jurisdictions, with $32 million going to the county, $16 million to Las Vegas, $8 million to Henderson and $6 million to North Las Vegas.
Several board members have said they ultimately want to see the money returned to the sewer customers who paid it.
Contact reporter Henry Brean at hbrean@reviewjournal.com or 702-383-0350.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
I will pay to construct a pipe from the plant to Dave Roger's house.
Per usual, Chris G. is being illogical. She calls it "repugnant that someone's holding out a vote that's good for the public for a political purpose" and yet that is exactly what she and her buddy Tom Collins are doing. They are punishing NLV and trying to embarrass Mayor Shari Buck by refusing to help the City resolve a problem that is clearly in the interest of NLV residents. Ms. G and Mr. Collins, et. at., whether you agree or not, hundreds of millions of dollars have already been wasted on the unnecessary wastewater treatment plant. Yes, the previous NLV City Council was populated by arrogant idiots. Some of those idiots are still around. No, they should not have spent so much money on a plant they didn't need. Yes, someone should have been minding the store. We all agree with you. But the damage has been done. This is not simply a case of "bad behavior," Ms. G. This is a bad situation that needs adult leadership to solve the problem. So STOP picking on poor Robert Eliason and Anita Wood, and place the blame squarely where it belongs - at the feet of Shari Buck and her former colleagues on the NLV Council. Then, just shut up and give them a solution. Drainage washes are intended to carry water. Let the water flow.
If i lived in NLV, i would clean house of everyone associated with agreeing on this project. The former Director of Utilities David B., who is being paid even though he works in NC now, swindled the City Council and is directly responsible for this disaster. $240 M is now sitting idle, when Clark County had the land and treatment facilities planned to handle the additional flow. There was no back up plan and David B. should be sued by the Citizens of NLV for creating this mess. He did it to feed his ego, but when the whole plan started flling apart, he ran out of town cuz he was eventually gonna be canned for his poor leadership and even worse oversite.
'Work on the pipeline project was suspended in December 2009'
North Las Vegas Did not just say one day hey lets build a wast treatment plant and have nowhere to send the discharge, the had fulley intended to send it in the pipeline which was already being taxed and approved by the the the Clean Water Coalition , when it fell through the city has now nowhere to send it and the county seems to think they will punish the pepole in north legas, Chris Giunchigliani how is it bad behavior when it was built in good faith????? and definatley not NLV's fault?