1. Part I

    Always Justified

    Las Vegas police shoot often but seldom are disciplined.

    Visit the section
  2. Part II

    142 Dead, and Rising

    Many of the 378 shootings could have been avoided.

    Visit the section
  3. Part III

    Quick to Shoot, Slow to Change

    Las Vegas police are slow to deal with problems.

    Visit the section
  4. Part IV

    Broken System, Shattered Lives

    At every step, the inquest system protects police.

    Visit the section
  5. Part V

    Better Ways

    What Las Vegas can learn from other police departments.

    Visit the section
Part I: Always Justified

FAQ on Deadly Force

Posted: Nov. 27, 2011 | 12:00 a.m.
Updated: Nov. 27, 2011 | 12:23 a.m.

Q: When can police officers use deadly force?

A: Local and state law enforcement agencies create their own deadly force policies. Most follow a Justice Department policy that allows officers to use deadly force when there is “a reasonable belief that the subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or another person.”

Q: How do officers determine if deadly force is necessary?

A: Officers are trained to assess an incident and apply an appropriate level of force. Las Vegas police use a six-level process that starts with an officer’s mere presence at the scene, includes an array of nonlethal options, and ends with the possibility of using deadly force.

Q: Are police allowed to shoot someone who is running away?

A: Most departments, including those in the Las Vegas Valley, allow deadly force to prevent the escape of a “fleeing felon” who poses a significant threat to human life after escape.

Q: What about suspects with knives?

A: Officers are advised to shoot only if the person poses an immediate threat. Las Vegas police consider the “21-foot rule,” which is based on research showing an average person can cover that much ground before an officer can react, draw a gun and fire. Sometimes officers cite the fact that a person is within that distance in justifying their decision to shoot.

Q: What are police officers trained to do after shooting somebody?

A: Handcuff the subject regardless of injuries to prevent the person from assaulting them or anyone else.

Q: What happens to officers who shoot at somebody?

A: In Southern Nevada, officers are placed on paid administrative leave pending an internal investigation. Officers involved in fatal shootings until recently remained on leave until after a coroner’s inquest. With that process now in limbo, Clark County Sheriff Doug Gillespie returns officers “to work” after the internal review. If an officer’s use of deadly force is deemed criminal, the Clark County district attorney or state attorney general can file charges.

Q: Has a local police officer been successfully prosecuted or fired for shooting someone while on duty?

A: No. The state indicted but could not convict a Las Vegas vice officer who used a deadly chokehold on a suspect in 1990. No officer has been fired because of an on-duty shooting in 20 years.

Q: What legal options are available to people shot by police and families of those who die?

A: They can sue in state or federal court. Most go to federal court.

Q: Do local police have a shoot-to-kill policy?

A: No. Officers are trained to aim at  “center mass” — the chest — to incapacitate.

Q: Why don’t they shoot weapons out of suspects’ hands instead?

A: The chances of hitting a weapon, a hand or a leg are relatively low, particularly if the target is moving.

Q: Is it ever permissible for police to shoot an unarmed person?

A: Yes. In several cases, officers have fired at an unarmed person whose movement suggested the person was in fact armed. In other cases, officers have fired at suspects who tried to grab officers’ weapons.

Q: How often do police in the United States shoot people?

A: No one tracks it on a national basis.

Comments

Registration Notice: The Review-Journal has implemented a new registration procedure that requires all existing and new accounts to validate and login using Facebook. Visit the Registration FAQ for more information.
Terms & Conditions

The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.

Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.

Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.

  1. LOLOBEENE Dec. 1, 2011 | 6:22 p.m. Report Abuse

    I have no "Love" for these bad boys..they lie, also set the scene up to make all fall into place on their side....Vegas is not the only place in nevada where the cops are crooked, 18 months ago in Mesquite NV, myself and 4 others watched 3 task force cops {one of them is now Chef of police there} beat a man unconsious was put intensive care for 2 days ......these cops need "Policed" instead they make up their own rules and bad boy ways ...and power trip the whole time their doing a cops job !

  2. Darren-Chaker Nov. 30, 2011 | 12:27 a.m. Report Abuse

    I reviewed most of the cases. Most had guns or knives, few, if any had pepper spray or other less than lethal force used on them prior to being shoot. A few appear the opportunity to hold off and call in for support to defuse the situation should have been done. Having lived here for the last decade, I find two things true: (1) Vegas is a unique city not only in night life, but with the people it attracts from coast to coast trying to find redemption in the city of sin if they can't find a job; and (2) a police culture which is supported by the District Attorney who does not pursue officers in questionable cases of excessive force. Of course, a silent factor is the jury pool is made up of mostly 'hang em high' (pro-police) mind sets which police know makes the ultimate determination of who is found guilty, or civilly liable in court. Nonetheless, police often reflect those they police. I can only hope efforts in less than lethal force is emphasized, but understand most 'spur of the moment' decision to shoot can be planned out. Darren Chaker

Friday, May 25, 2012
Overcast Overcast, 79° Weather Forecast