Comments (13) | Add a comment
Doctor working as FBI informant reportedly wearing a wire since 2008
Tools
LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL
Call him a mystery man for the moment.
He is an unidentified Las Vegas physician who ran around town wearing a wire for the FBI the past four years.
His task was to record conversations with health care professionals as part of an undercover FBI investigation.
That is the word from defense lawyers in court papers filed late last week in a criminal case against a medical supplier charged with providing $26,150 in kickbacks to the doctor from December 2008 to December 2010.
In August, Anil Mathur, owner of United Medical Supplies, was indicted on nine counts of "offering and paying remuneration" under the federal anti-kickback statute to the physician to steer Medicare business his way. Mathur provided oxygen supplies to the physician's patients.
The doctor was not identified in the indictment, and Mathur's defense lawyers, Paul Padda and Robert Draskovich, who apparently have been told the doctor's identity, did not name him in their court papers.
The lawyers would not publicly disclose his name when pressed in interviews.
Padda and Draskovich described the physician in their court papers as "an informant for the government" who had developed a three-year friendship with Mathur starting in 2009.
The lawyers said the prosecutor in the case, Assistant U.S. Attorney Crane Pomerantz, disclosed at a Jan. 19 hearing that the confidential informant was secretly recording conversations as far back as January 2008, a year before he had befriended Mathur.
"The import of this information is that the (confidential informant) physician has been wearing a wire for the government and recording conversations with individuals other than Mr. Mathur since January 2008," the lawyers wrote.
Padda and Draskovich suggested in a footnote that the other individuals could be "doctors or health care executives."
"Presumably," the lawyers added, "prior to developing a friendship with Mr. Mathur, the (confidential informant) received instruction from the government regarding who to tape, what to say, what type of information to elicit, techniques for eliciting information and desirable targets for prosecution by the government.
"Logic would dictate everything the (confidential informant) did from the beginning of his involvement with the government was subject to the direction, control and approval of the government."
In their court papers, the lawyers are seeking to overturn a magistrate's order denying the defense additional evidence it requested from the government, including information about the activities of the unidentified physician.
Pomerantz turned over 425 pages of documents and 17 recordings to Mathur's lawyers but has indicated he has nothing more of relevance to the case to give the defense.
Padda and Draskovich, however, disagreed with the prosecutor's position in their court papers. They argued that the case hinges on the jury's impressions of Mathur's relationship with the confidential FBI informant.
"These impressions will be impacted by information pertaining to the (confidential informant's) taping of others, information supplied to the government by the (confidential informant) regarding others and other surreptitious tape recordings that shed light on the manner in which the government conducted its investigation and reasons regarding whom to target and why," they said.
Information about other potential FBI targets the physician sought out "could reveal the (confidential informant's) motivations for wearing a wire for a four-year period -- an odd and unusual event for a physician," the defense lawyers said.
The FBI on Tuesday would not identify the physician or confirm or deny the physician was a confidential informant. The U.S. attorney's office declined comment.
In his indictment, Mathur is charged with paying the physician on nine separate occasions over the two-year period ending in December 2010. The amounts paid each time varied from $1,500 to $5,150, the indictment said.
"The purpose of the anti-kickback statute is to ensure that the medical referral decision is made with the patient's best interest in mind," the indictment said.
The statute, the indictment added, also is designed to "prevent inflation of the cost of medical treatment by the payment of referral fees" and prevent "the referral of patients for care that they do not need."
The government is also seeking to force Mathur to forfeit more than $20,000 to the government.
Contact Jeff German at jgerman@reviewjournal.com or 702-380-8135.
Trending topics:
Comments
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. The Review-Journal does not review comments before publication nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please use the Report Abuse button.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 24 hours. Please do not submit a comment more than once.
Note: Comments made by reporters and editors of the Las Vegas Review-Journal are presented with a yellow background.
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Those days of Physicians being sent to Hawaii for minimal justification, or inviting a spouse to dinner or on a trip paid by the pharma company are LONG over in the pharma industry - just so you know. Reps are no longer allowed to Pay for anything other than a Doctor's feedback or speaking fees (they are even required to present slides approved by the FDA). The PhrMA guidelines are strictly enforced. Reps are no longer even allowed to so much as give a pen to the office. The straightforward bribes are illegal, and those who do it will eventually be caught. I am sure the only way to get caught is for someone with ethics to turn them in. The movie "Love and Other Drugs" was based on information from 13 years ago. The last 5 years have changed... a lot!
Get the government OUT of healthcare.
law breakers should be caught by any means necessary. the ones that cut the corners hurt the honest ones, they need to be captured and punished.
This means very little. Physicians are routinely employed as "consultants" for new products, they are sent to Hawaii and other travel destinations with their wives for "conferences" by drug manufacturers, and in return they prescribe non generic drugs which end up costing patients the higher prices. A straightforward bribe is unnecessary, and not very clever.
Crane Pomerantz has his own demons to deal with. He is named in a lawsuit in which he refused to reveal knowledge of the criminal activity by FBI Agent Jack Gruber, Las Vegas Field Office.
Didn't Germany have guys like Dr. Snitch telling the Gestapo where the Jews lived?
Oscar...the machine determines if your car passes or not. There's no law against fixing it yourself.
Prior to 2008 what crime did they catch the Doctor wearing the wire do?
lol
No surprise. This is Harry Reid's playground.
Good start. Next, go after Dentists. Then, SMOG Kiosk operators, who insist your car ALMOST passed, it was SO close,...but they can recommend a nearby mechanic to adjust your engine, to help you pass....